Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w2GBnlgE010128 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 12:49:49 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1ewnem-0008B0-VE for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 11:36:20 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1ewnem-0008Ar-DF for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 11:36:20 +0000 Received: from mail-wr0-x230.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c0c::230]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ewnej-0005JZ-NR for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 11:36:19 +0000 Received: by mail-wr0-x230.google.com with SMTP id n12so11404091wra.2 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 04:36:17 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:message-id:to:cc:subject:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=qXXX+dCsxMc+0pM7abNQ067y8d0xRbm5am/FETEV8Qc=; b=NB7nFlaGv4ej9uoRw2Txqsgt03hijFApomyIEZOrcGxvJGg62c9xUueR6EymTGbprS 8UHCMa1fo0woRY+fJBvL+0y3XShEik3M104t9vIsn0crvjNJBh8VphP3WG7cNk1Twa5G gnlsnTGL696MxtGaE6D8zpblYwlcVmEzxFCUKXVyufxXdbd2QEVDuymdtNHstdJz/tLl vNU8bcwPEkEXzeR+FokoRSxx0Xgn+nfajqW+BAR8vSOOVmAu1f/ZDFVPXIgQ6E3qn0NT CHF3g5LPdlO/VML6fhSTBVb8WJC5QVKwZH3wM/MkWbJw9mZHDMc8mNb1d/ScRrBNH0H/ +cFQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:message-id:to:cc:subject:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=qXXX+dCsxMc+0pM7abNQ067y8d0xRbm5am/FETEV8Qc=; b=JckTezR8KtoNsrUN5RnP0LcuznN0WwXxJhBL1H5nh8kd5s/ROblq2XWjzKcep6NuDa PmmTeiX1lM4nojz1QnrQz73MTyogk3glpvvtRPrIZRoAJRi/aSjNGkiHPuYH2afOsZeC tTIFNsFm15UqO/oykIEQ8Q22pY+B7aZcwBeutZreODwe/O23Dydk6ehVks9khScQLi7k l1uezbocMTmHDjCdkbUvs4c04zKj38q/ZprkWHsuMcJt1lgZJxGJpzjfIhj5tOMDBrJW 1sIzLOAxapZXi9JgQ4tZsLVS3pXD/d9esaaHQth8DJQ2icJJTJtGrwVK1OysJIvdQRYh XPAA== X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7EHBtuEI6Xz6npeWvrkw81FMLNuD5lglHyjRd2sgnEfNmagLy/u oEUm76qk3+aTXn2/jbiAMQLewg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELuXJYlNSyS3qKi/B/B4GxjtsYLHmC+HK9a1/nTTUMR9IKKVuhVJl/oR7npUsCCdH0tNVbwiqg== X-Received: by 10.223.161.77 with SMTP id r13mr1389388wrr.1.1521200175217; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 04:36:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from OfficeWin7.lan (82-70-254-222.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk. [82.70.254.222]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a185sm1944068wmf.1.2018.03.16.04.36.14 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 16 Mar 2018 04:36:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 11:36:13 +0000 From: Chris Wilson X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <772364530.20180316113613@gmail.com> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org CC: dead.fets@gmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello LF'ers, Been Googling and see a mixed response to should a receive pre-amp go before or after a BPF. I have mine before the pre-amp, does the panel concur with this being correct? Thanks! Aerial, isolation transformer for ground loops, BPF, pre-amp, Red Pitaya as the LF receiver. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dead.fets[at]gmail.com) 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 4ad5f3f1a9241b934aaa5d0e23c9dc57 Subject: LF: Pre amp *after* BPF?? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hello LF'ers, Been Googling and see a mixed response to should a receive pre-amp go before or after a BPF. I have mine before the pre-amp, does the panel concur with this being correct? Thanks! Aerial, isolation transformer for ground loops, BPF, pre-amp, Red Pitaya as the LF receiver. -- Best regards, Chris mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com