Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w29KIcK6014217 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 21:18:40 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1euONU-0002bS-Lx for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2018 20:12:32 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1euONM-0002bJ-Ll for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2018 20:12:24 +0000 Received: from rgout0801.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk ([65.20.0.148]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1euONJ-0002NX-5i for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2018 20:12:22 +0000 X-OWM-Source-IP: 109.152.80.233 (GB) X-OWM-Env-Sender: alan.melia@btinternet.com X-RazorGate-Vade-Classification: clean X-RazorGate-Vade-Verdict: clean 0 X-VadeSecure-score: verdict=clean score=0/300, class=clean X-SNCR-VADESECURE: CLEAN X-RazorGate-Vade-Verdict: clean 0 X-RazorGate-Vade-Classification: clean X-Junkmail-Premium-Raw: score=12/50,refid=2.7.2:2018.3.9.195115:17:12.731,ip=,rules=__HAS_MSGID, __SANE_MSGID, MSGID_32HEX_LC, INVALID_MSGID_NO_FQDN, __MSGID_32HEX, __HAS_FROM, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL_FROM, __TO_MALFORMED_2, __TO_NO_NAME, __REFERENCES, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT, __MIME_VERSION, __CT, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN, __CTE, __HAS_X_PRIORITY, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI, __HAS_X_MAILER, USER_AGENT_OE, __OUTLOOK_MUA_1, __USER_AGENT_MS_GENERIC, __ANY_URI, __FRAUD_BODY_WEBMAIL, __URI_NO_WWW, FRAUD_ATTACH, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE, __FORWARDED_MSG, __NO_HTML_TAG_RAW, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS, BODY_SIZE_2000_2999, __MIME_TEXT_P1, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY, __URI_NS, HTML_00_01, HTML_00_10, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL, MSG_THREAD, LEGITIMATE_SIGNS, __OUTLOOK_MUA, __PHISH_SPEAR_STRUCTURE_1, __MIME_TEXT_P, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK, REFERENCES, NO_URI_HTTPS, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS X-RazorGate-Vade: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedtfedrkeeigddufeefucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuueftkffvkffujffvgffngfevqffopdfqfgfvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepkffhvfhfufffgggtgffrigfoqfesthejjedtuddtudenucfhrhhomhepfdetlhgrnhcuofgvlhhirgdfuceorghlrghnrdhmvghlihgrsegsthhinhhtvghrnhgvthdrtghomheqnecukfhppedutdelrdduhedvrdektddrvdeffeenucfrrghrrghmpehhvghlohepghhnrghtpdhinhgvthepuddtledrudehvddrkedtrddvfeefpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepoegrlhgrnhdrmhgvlhhirgessghtihhnthgvrhhnvghtrdgtohhmqeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt Received: from gnat (109.152.80.233) by rgout08.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk (9.0.019.24-1) (authenticated as alan.melia@btinternet.com) id 5A9D45F400693FA5 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 20:12:18 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=btcpcloud; t=1520626341; bh=3Y1BlqhOJqdUFux5RSeBQpVfpfrmWQPQcrn5HwoSS98=; h=Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:X-Mailer; b=vkQp3wNckR/+wuTOrvcp3g/NcOWf1GiJsHS91EVG/qAAqAcjWWQHKZ7J3o+z9U62mpduSAJ9JHeCGT2nCAm8x1h1qd389hQhYJn0wbwvuvFPNbaOnQO8fiF1h6/pnYRbonAdp3Z//Qn6SfTTIRed80ehvde7O3gxt4FZohEgAmA= Message-ID: <6793F7B8EC7F493C87174FF4019CD251@gnat> From: "Alan Melia" To: References: <3610102492.20180308120003@gmail.com> <98C09BB1F3184387904CD2E8F05043E2@gnat> Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 20:01:27 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Clemens yes I realised that from later posts I should have realised materials 2 & 3 were iron dust. I doubt from the reports that it is getting to the kind of temperatures that would give non-linearity in that material. [...] Content analysis details: (0.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.2 STOX_REPLY_TYPE No description available. 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 138e3b341e0543401afa7e97ee054540 Subject: LF: Re: RE: Re: Can an air cored LPF inductor have as high a "Q" as a toroidal wound one? Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Clemens yes I realised that from later posts I should have realised materials 2 & 3 were iron dust. I doubt from the reports that it is getting to the kind of temperatures that would give non-linearity in that material. However heat generated in the inductor indicates loss and reduced Q......and Chris was talking about Q levels. I think from previous posts he is using toroidal cores to reduce the coupling between the cores. Of course if it is IR loss in the wire then even air cored will not help. Litz would but previous tests by Dave Pick G3YXM about 15 years ago suggested that the difference in using Litz (ex Decca nav TX coils) was quite small at 136kHz. It will be interesting to see which way he goes Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: "Clemens Paul" To: Sent: Friday, March 09, 2018 4:43 PM Subject: LF: RE: Re: Can an air cored LPF inductor have as high a "Q" as a toroidal wound one? > Hi Alan, > >>One thought I dont know the answer to.......magnetisation is >>not a linear >>effect, if you are getting heating you are into the saturation >>area......what does his non-linearity do to the signal ! It may even > > Chris is using #2 material mix,i.e. iron powder toroids,not ferrite. > Iron powder is essentially not saturable because overheating will > set the flux limit long before saturation occurs,see attachment. > > > 73 > Clemens > DL4RAJ > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >>[mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Alan Melia >>Sent: Thursday, March 8, 2018 2:55 PM >>To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >>Subject: LF: Re: Can an air cored LPF inductor have as high a >>"Q" as a toroidal wound one? >> >>Chris my take on this.....not having used this level of power >>at LF.....if >>the core is gettting hot it is not providing a particularly >>high Q !! My >>line is that LPF are best made with air cored inductors, the >>values required >>are not so high as to need ferrite. (see MRF and YXM filters) >>It does mean >>care in layout to avoid coupling between the stages. You may >>even be able >>to use a non-magnetic toroidal core! Current sensing >>transformers at Rugby >>GBR 16kHz (similar to the transformers in Jim Moritz >>scopematch) were wound >>on discs of Tufnol (SRBF) >> >>One thought I dont know the answer to.......magnetisation is >>not a linear >>effect, if you are getting heating you are into the saturation >>area......what does his non-linearity do to the signal ! It may even >>compromise the effect your are trying to obtain ......actually >>generating >>harmonics?? >> >>Alan >>G3NYK >