Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w2JHshVl022874 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 18:54:46 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1exyv3-0003mo-BO for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 17:50:01 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1exyv3-0003ma-0n for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 17:50:01 +0000 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1exyv0-0002lH-Bu for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 17:49:59 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84B9420DEA for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 18:49:55 +0100 (CET) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1521481795; bh=RV9gWNo89Z/tJbjes8IHJlXfdA8uEOG+Rz6tJdgfxBg=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=DOrOQcIpmN0q8tWBI+Ba+rWyM/01HEJjhxTAL6jW8UBvEUX8IWfrrHWnfMnHYPD8q 6qfFZTDTDd8oQvPvCyih7iiZ8hW8dYkyRmWQVGsiR3/p8KkRsAyUszB352dmsCZrgk PB+/RwD8xnl5kYYZKAZoouPtaVRNBbptqA7so9/QtOt6IOCGdmHuk/3KypbdB1RV3V MMgyAKViglVXPmj2uw2TMzSToLSSdrQ+x37HrHFLe+swOvfYfdK99EXip1mCUlNH7+ ea4Q25roE3Cotjr0rBbm+yEZT62NtgEtQUqhBSPVEccgNydWe9qyMZd+jqCVpbqEsv S6m/jJYiDMcSQ== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 404k9H08tRz9rxS for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 18:49:54 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5AAFF842.4010306@posteo.de> Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 18:49:54 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <396821650.20180319124318@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Paul, VLF/LF, I just had the thought about the Red Pitaya which is Linux based, as i heared. Since it has 4 inputs (or outputs), could it be used together with vlfrx tools? That would solve a lot of problems and could give a standarisized module inclusive software. And all that maybe not only for VLF but also for LF/MF ? Guess you already had the idea and found some answers? [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 6aac716dc074d63ee3780b79bbe46b5d Subject: LF: Red Pitaya and vlfrx tools? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Paul, VLF/LF, I just had the thought about the Red Pitaya which is Linux based, as i heared. Since it has 4 inputs (or outputs), could it be used together with vlfrx tools? That would solve a lot of problems and could give a standarisized module inclusive software. And all that maybe not only for VLF but also for LF/MF ? Guess you already had the idea and found some answers? 73, Stefan