Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w2JGS21l022548 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 17:28:04 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1exxYB-0002xr-BW for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 16:22:19 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1exxYA-0002xi-TU for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 16:22:18 +0000 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1exxY8-00022p-45 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 16:22:17 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E796F21011 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 17:22:13 +0100 (CET) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1521476533; bh=6jca+ffo24CmEUHHeuUfvd/h8WaCvAUSQvAATwjkgjc=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=VFDtcVsW5bYSfu97ZsTjIrBOZ0Kqgp8ligzwEnjgkC90uWmKxglxZCZ9x+y03QHPp +2Noy+fNcTxUTkEBKZTgLuAH8eFOQRWAcZulGqmvo9iPGwj5ShIh/BZcnWgTzTiO4S WENWveSOF9OjY4PbaV2BYWdl1sXuKlhYmWJcWte4O/SNqi1wAkgrAhx5y0GShIGxke 3SjIluBT+3hivUF5ma7NVrf5iPksTc19wFvkY7VXUXBueV2kT589WJLcZtl9uKbpET woFdjLi3XhNG+ZiA/oI3+dQQaTi/XR4u14tvz0jKTPbHi57fDtZ0pXOWWU8cU1AJhK 0r2gurCSbOrOw== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 404hD41Tk5z9s2h for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 17:22:12 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5AAFE3B3.8050603@posteo.de> Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 17:22:11 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <8a85a7a8-7a1b-f38c-3581-88701aeaf955@n1bug.com> In-Reply-To: <8a85a7a8-7a1b-f38c-3581-88701aeaf955@n1bug.com> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Paul, There is an old version of WSJT-X that contains slow JT9 modes. If i remember correctly there was -1 -2 -5 and -10. Maybe someone has the old exe still available? 73, Stefan [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: f62c7cf8eeb8e5a327b71719e9bffff1 Subject: Re: LF: 2200m Trans-Atlantic QSO dream... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Paul, There is an old version of WSJT-X that contains slow JT9 modes. If i remember correctly there was -1 -2 -5 and -10. Maybe someone has the old exe still available? 73, Stefan Am 19.03.2018 17:07, schrieb N1BUG: > One of my big dreams is to complete a two-way QSO across the > Atlantic on 2200m. It has been done. It can be done. My station is > getting close to being ready. I have heard 2E0ILY up to -12 SNR on > WSPR2 and I have been reported with -19 SNR by G8HUH and G0LUJ. > > It is too late for this season as QRN is always high now. But for > next winter I should have 3 dB more power and hopefully more/better > receive antennas. > > Modes are a bit of a problem. On the best nights JT9 would be easy > but most of the time it would probably have to be QRSS or DFCW. It's > too bad we don't have a very slow digital QSO mode like JT9-10 or such. > > So, who is going to take the challenge for a dream QSO next winter? > You have all summer to get the station ready... ;-) > > 73, > Paul N1BUG FN55mf > >