Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w2IIkTNb019153 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 19:46:30 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1exdGU-0007bz-61 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 18:42:42 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1exdGT-0007bq-Rj for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 18:42:41 +0000 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1exdGR-0006aG-3O for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 18:42:40 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 635C920F40 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 19:42:38 +0100 (CET) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1521398558; bh=SgFjR2yOnS5yPGLuW9StQKQN1qeHlPjrRpk5fZj0wBw=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=GDM+sfJWqn662mfTFKd+WLGo8qhajE2uJO0WrMu5s2OvHl5ZKCg37G79/FokOhyeD kYXhw2ge0AXki+R+KPP1lqIMoU/ukt9c+mZLBA4mLXdxc3I9ZRNPaQ50oDgmxGg7KM ttLHUXp7Mw8fPoEKT0wcCmEbXKmhT0O9mifGuSQrUqPvRHDTffRvs54g6Mro+Z+I2H HUlm09AEfXe2zKFr9F/pAeYyGNdM73O0LPsdzwv8/vlaY1fljJyfaYnZq+r9VQzFv8 rczNY06+UfLjV03IvkhTe29Uwc1m8CK5iIEKxTUGg7XbE7DmW1HLX6g178zLFI5eV7 lmx5m9/rk7URA== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4047NY6nZbz9rxX for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 19:42:37 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5AAEB31D.7010803@posteo.de> Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2018 19:42:37 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003ABA3C369B8@servigilant.vigilant.local> <5AAEB091.70709@posteo.de> In-Reply-To: <5AAEB091.70709@posteo.de> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Am 18.03.2018 19:31, schrieb DK7FC: > >> Sure I'm missing something here. I think have read there is a 4 >> sample delay to be added to the offset >> time. > There is also a 0.3 second delay if the TX stations uses SL to > transmit the VLF signal, like i do. > For the above file start i'm calculating the offset as: > 0.3 +4/SR +18.96+7*60 [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: d7907c3bf895ca41e0bedc3fa074f0d4 Subject: Re: LF: EbNaut for Dummies (again) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------000204010603040204000803" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------000204010603040204000803 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Am 18.03.2018 19:31, schrieb DK7FC: > >> Sure I'm missing something here. I think have read there is a 4 >> sample delay to be added to the offset >> time. > There is also a 0.3 second delay if the TX stations uses SL to > transmit the VLF signal, like i do. > For the above file start i'm calculating the offset as: > 0.3 +4/SR +18.96+7*60 ...more detailed, to avoid misunderstandings: SR means the samplerate of the wav file, which is usually something arround 1 /sec. It is also displayed in the ebnaut decoder, like the start time. It is not the sample rate of the soundcard (e.g. 48000 /sec). --------------000204010603040204000803 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Am 18.03.2018 19:31, schrieb DK7FC:

Sure I'm missing something here. I think have read there is a 4 sample delay to be added to the offset
time.
There is also a 0.3 second delay if the TX stations uses SL to transmit the VLF signal, like i do.
For the above file start i'm calculating the offset as:
0.3 +4/SR +18.96+7*60

...more detailed, to avoid misunderstandings: SR means the samplerate of the wav file, which is usually something arround 1 /sec. It is also displayed in the ebnaut decoder, like the start time.
It is not the sample rate of the soundcard (e.g. 48000 /sec).
--------------000204010603040204000803--