Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w29DwWS6013187 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 14:58:35 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1euIT5-0001ma-2U for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2018 13:53:55 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1euIT4-0001mR-MK for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2018 13:53:54 +0000 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1euIT1-0000s0-OM for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2018 13:53:53 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9923520F13 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 14:53:49 +0100 (CET) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1520603629; bh=0GRGanHhdfkLzu0l6tRpSixKwVRzQU6DTr5PP/ZeMZ4=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=mrfaTLHiB3YWC3fA3mvou41AVbXqPtZpNBzG/p9RJNMe+vefWIKCz6qx0TEMU+lU2 kFnPwRm7Aq7RQfpMlPnFaHsB5X9Cf0SiBhS8kS7U+dx5iPKy8n91bbD8uSBAKVWn5q KD6Cc8vG5j+zORMCQ7p9eZal3vjXDYgPMaAa8BqARpVvNaaXleoKbEvqWPdlCZEcXx jIwGa6Uxb3MS3ROnoHcQjk/PLQoYUHIkyqRKnG2ZxGFTrytzMuLi9RWi+z+rJtuwjg jmoL+/yjaY6Y5OdJafc8Hb5L3k3qWqznehme6BukddkJIglixhvrq79ZS3cPVLX/ou G8CtA3A+/OJZA== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3zyTPS1Gb2z9rxk for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 14:53:48 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5AA291EB.20401@posteo.de> Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2018 14:53:47 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4ac6d43f-85c7-bd05-85b9-5b64ebcfbf35@abelian.org> <2f6a408a-af27-9c9b-b116-7becd9b1c66f@abelian.org> <6eced61e-a7ce-2935-195d-4a76f375b11e@freenet.de> <633c1982-97fe-7d9d-7f69-07e3503147bb@abelian.org> <5A88244B.1020304@posteo.de> <1b3df450-bb19-b667-b784-17c8b48917db@abelian.org> <5A889F44.5070205@posteo.de> <358b9220-66f7-39dc-3f92-60fa62a623ee@abelian.org> <4640db50-2fd8-5dcb-edf1-bf91c247813f@verizon.net> <64a7a3ac-c682-6248-34de-9d6274b19951@abelian.org> <5A9A937E.6000309@posteo.de> <3c381c42-d93b-4a58-e698-08e0a5a3cc3d@psk31.plus.com> <5A9AE81E.1020009@posteo.de> <5AA00391.6030804@posteo.de> <5AA052BD.4010002@posteo.de> <5AA14891.7060505@posteo.de> <2caa4dbc-95b6-1bb0-e50b-294918ed9f9d@dl5xl.de> <5AA17AC4.9070302@posteo.de> <5AA1A5F0.9000305@posteo.de> <5AA1AF16.4010003@posteo.de> In-Reply-To: <5AA1AF16.4010003@posteo.de> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: MF, Well, several strong stations were TXing WSPR-2 last night on 630m. The condx seemed to be quite good. FR5DH has got 35 decode from 3 stations, best reports were: Timestamp Call MHz SNR Drift Grid Pwr Reporter RGrid km az 2018-03-08 23:22 G3KEV 0.475628 -22 0 IO94sh 5 FR5DH LG78pw 9915 130 2018-03-08 23:36 DK7FC 0.475682 -23 0 JN49ik 1 FR5DH LG78pw 9087 137 2018-03-08 22:20 EA5DOM 0.475609 -24 0 IM98xn 1 FR5DH LG78pw 8783 129 [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 18c0ce4cbca80559a8b22b14cd653174 Subject: Re: LF: Antarctica on 630m WSPR Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050506070403000705000408" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050506070403000705000408 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MF, Well, several strong stations were TXing WSPR-2 last night on 630m. The condx seemed to be quite good. FR5DH has got 35 decode from 3 stations, best reports were: Timestamp Call MHz SNR Drift Grid Pwr Reporter RGrid km az 2018-03-08 23:22 G3KEV 0.475628 -22 0 IO94sh 5 FR5DH LG78pw 9915 130 2018-03-08 23:36 DK7FC 0.475682 -23 0 JN49ik 1 FR5DH LG78pw 9087 137 2018-03-08 22:20 EA5DOM 0.475609 -24 0 IM98xn 1 FR5DH LG78pw 8783 129 The path to FR5DH is not directly on the path to DP0GVN but the landpath to cross for these 3 stations is similar or even more. The rest of the distance to make is just across sea water. I don't know, maybe it is much more difficult to get a decode on 630m in Antarctica because it is so close to the pole, geomag stuff and so on. Or, it could be an issue of RX sensitivity at that frequency. The audio file to analyse would help. Yesterday we (Rik) invited VK4YB to participate in the experiment but he just started to TX again at 08:24 UTC. Any more ideas someone? For tonite i'll be back on VLF, continuing to try to pass the 5 char message over to W1VD and K3SIW... 73, Stefan --------------050506070403000705000408 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MF,

Well, several strong stations were TXing WSPR-2 last night on 630m.
The condx seemed to be quite good. FR5DH has got 35 decode from 3 stations, best reports were:

Timestamp Call MHz SNR Drift Grid Pwr Reporter RGrid km az
 2018-03-08 23:22   G3KEV   0.475628   -22   0   IO94sh   5   FR5DH   LG78pw   9915   130 
 2018-03-08 23:36   DK7FC   0.475682   -23   0   JN49ik   1   FR5DH   LG78pw   9087   137 
 2018-03-08 22:20   EA5DOM   0.475609   -24   0   IM98xn   1   FR5DH   LG78pw   8783   129 

The path to FR5DH is not directly on the path to DP0GVN but the landpath to cross for these 3 stations is similar or even more. The rest of the distance to make is just across sea water.
I don't know, maybe it is much more difficult to get a decode on 630m in Antarctica because it is so close to the pole, geomag stuff and so on. Or, it could be an issue of RX sensitivity at that frequency.
The audio file to analyse would help.

Yesterday we (Rik) invited VK4YB to participate in the experiment but he just started to TX again at 08:24 UTC.

Any more ideas someone?

For tonite i'll be back on VLF, continuing to try to pass the 5 char message over to W1VD and K3SIW...

73, Stefan
--------------050506070403000705000408--