Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w2NFrd92008360 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 16:53:41 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1ezOv2-0001V3-B6 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 15:47:52 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1ezOv0-0001Uu-Gd for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 15:47:50 +0000 Received: from mout.perfora.net ([74.208.4.196]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ezOux-0000j4-Oa for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 15:47:49 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.127] ([72.224.254.201]) by mrelay.perfora.net (mreueus002 [74.208.5.2]) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0LoY3A-1eOidn08hG-00gYMa; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 16:46:49 +0100 References: <77fdd1d6-7e60-2f33-8c6e-98f787fe0ca8@n1bug.com> To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" , "rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk" , "Discussion of the Lowfer (US, European, & UK) and MedFer bands" From: N1BUG Message-ID: <2a7d341c-4f6b-28ce-3ea0-26732b67060e@n1bug.com> Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 11:46:47 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:3aqx3d+iu0mcuHBzY9l1nr5QJ1S6K1Q4m4gMSqRBEkGkJ807KfG UqpItXO/GFy1mBUqHm0Ut/97cd3fIWzV1opA/F73eNEGNWFDxyCm4HWuNf74YiCN3GUR0qF NvaxrrQP0jDsL1pkkdKb9MAGBOWvWT4CFQD0Z1GAU5IRtH/jeUaDkSuznrhiaAT8cZ4ytY0 SQrnC1aqEPqUN1Jo+RLfg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:HiVfwauy7HI=:G83Pb+gOag9QaDhFKwoH+r oNZPKCU6rTlUEM1A9j/5L5igTso4bZL4z3N6CbH7V8XvcAHO9PQfXeYmaAjhR+prkFBlOQjmL 6LJSIgI2snnQ5nRQORkAEKeVFf1iNREfSL4LtBWLMaIi2gyFBJzy8U38ZnsU01KfnmBL9L6ji 44dyP2doe7dR4K7DxBOIbHX93RTFlVD8gJsboWAKTYPQWYBl2Qx1YAkZFD98OczcZeV2p9xXK dNtQT+NUMKZEviDJUGYWwsomaDMoBCSMSZHvWmNQtgnJqgOq5mS67oZHJjdFbT0kP5eIbQyR2 vACWKSRh3VoMeL51lYQ2bhJyHmeMdamh5KcgS7Te366h5M255jGGIEeFRzqcbdMgyTjSmr9us 6b6VgBbo9OlkqjpwadZ+rT5nvIeMySoaEWGAsB+QnUsG4jV+jaHzidYklUj1Ad7da2D78+MyZ kL3M6s+H1euj9FjRQVeF3IM2q0wVzWmI/I9j48SzCMGf7NsGy+2tiy+dDDYr6JfEV6UTRwZaL 4FTRhAXdym4Fcxp9tC3AEk6nSwegcTUrk27Lon/6v9pWnstMlffmTdFtLabzUU0sEwj/2WeQv JZFlho/1toc/LuzkBhusBr252OAEALEHpQCHb1csf4IzrSg2H/AUEbwnGCaPRWHeIsl3pFg3L wly6LDA85OoqaTCiT3ORWCSIIlZ2qGL0wlZNCKWJNB8g8mOxGgR1ofMGlSjFKlnlBGHBFQWWg v+UvwC/Pea2Cvfdiev+RG9yxl5f2X8WyUjy5uDnHh9nsljCBFv5ONkytls8= X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: This question has been answered to my satisfaction. Thank you to all who took the time to share your knowledge and thoughts. The historical perspective provided by Alex, R7NT sums it up for me. Historically QSOs requiring multiple nights have been recognized for a long time. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Scan-Signature: 59677119386dcf9f1872cb454dc1331d Subject: Re: LF: Important question on LF QSOs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.0 required=5.0 tests=SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This question has been answered to my satisfaction. Thank you to all who took the time to share your knowledge and thoughts. The historical perspective provided by Alex, R7NT sums it up for me. Historically QSOs requiring multiple nights have been recognized for a long time. I agree of course about the entire QSO taking place by radio on 137 kHz (or 136 :) I have a long history of VHF/UHF weak signal work including EME and I and I fully understand this. Of course such a commitment of time is a lot to ask of a QSO partner! 73, Paul N1BUG (back to building LF gear now :)