Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w2MM8cRW005434 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 23:08:41 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1ez8He-0006VJ-Pf for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 22:02:06 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1ez8HN-0006VA-0r for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 22:01:49 +0000 Received: from omr-a014e.mx.aol.com ([204.29.186.62]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ez8HJ-0004DW-66 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 22:01:47 +0000 Received: from mtaomg-aaj02.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-aaj02.mx.aol.com [172.27.3.208]) by omr-a014e.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id AA25E38000A0 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 18:01:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from core-ace06e.mail.aol.com (core-ace06.mail.aol.com [172.27.23.6]) by mtaomg-aaj02.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id 3E28038000081 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 18:01:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 188.194.222.230 by webjas-vad089.srv.aolmail.net (10.96.35.92) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Thu, 22 Mar 2018 18:01:38 -0400 Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 18:01:40 -0400 From: Markus Vester To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Message-Id: <1624fbb4fbc-c83-130b3@webjas-vad089.srv.aolmail.net> In-Reply-To: <80f2d2e3-a6f4-677c-89f3-eef3b60fa70c@n1bug.com> References: <80f2d2e3-a6f4-677c-89f3-eef3b60fa70c@n1bug.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI X-MB-Message-Type: User X-Mailer: JAS STD X-Originating-IP: [188.194.222.230] x-aol-global-disposition: G DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20150623; t=1521756100; bh=eWpzkeFHBvLApT9Nz28joXkDjuXfw9wYjSjUki60rpE=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=XE5onpDju7Sie9LXkV26rHkgwWIXaUu5db1OfUmp1vmcDwQdgjjsPH3hdxeg6w9b4 yW8nUGywcjnyNiM5/GqcMa3BuHFp8JTJsRhp1rIxJ25NHo5WUi5PbEoa+a1NLJq+YQ h3elG7J9FxIl7j/gxPwf5jPgmjq+EZKVKmCkwyPw= x-aol-sid: 3039ac1b03d05ab427c41086 X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Paul, a few faint traces on your frequency pair appeared also in Nuremberg at 2 to 3 UT and again around sunriuse 5 UT, still shown on the ovenight screenshots http://df6nm.de/grabber/LF_lastnight.htm Unfortunately this comes nowhere near to what the other European receivers got. [...] Content analysis details: (0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (markusvester[at]aol.com) 0.6 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL's NS IP listed in the Spamhaus SBL blocklist [URIs: n1bug.com] 0.1 URIBL_SBL_A Contains URL's A record listed in the Spamhaus SBL blocklist [URIs: n1bug.com] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 32d4aaaf019758ff5a0d8e92eec683e6 Subject: Re: LF: DFCW Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_102344_2144811231.1521756098492" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false ------=_Part_102344_2144811231.1521756098492 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Paul, a few faint traces on your frequency pair appeared also in Nuremberg at 2 t= o 3 UT and again around sunriuse 5 UT, still shown on the ovenight screensh= ots http://df6nm.de/grabber/LF_lastnight.htm Unfortunately this comes nowhere near to what the other European receivers = got.=20 73, Markus (DF6NM) -----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung-----=20 Von: N1BUG An: rsgb_lf_group ; rsgb_lf_group ; Discussion of the Lowfer (US, European, & UK) and M= edFer bands Verschickt: Do, 22. Mrz 2018 16:07 Betreff: LF: DFCW A big THANK YOU to all who ran grabbers and sent captures last night. It is very much appreciated! I was seen by many in the U.S. plus G4DMA, 2E0ILY, DL/SWL, DF2JP and DK7FC. It is difficult to know how propagation was but the commercial indicators I saw in my transmission gaps (mainly DCF39 and HGA22) seemed to be rather poor. The plan for tonight is to continue as before but change to DFCW90 for better readability. I will also increase the gap between repetitions of my call sign. I did make an error yesterday when I said 187.5 Hertz shift. Of course it is milliHertz! 73, Paul N1BUG ------=_Part_102344_2144811231.1521756098492 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Paul,

a few faint traces on y= our frequency pair appeared also in Nuremberg at 2 to 3 UT and again a= round sunriuse 5 UT, still shown on the ovenight screenshots
http://df6n= m.de/grabber/LF_lastnight.htm
Unfortunately this comes nowhere near to w= hat the other European receivers got.

73, Markus (DF6NM= )

-----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung----- Von: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
An: rsgb_lf_= group <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>; rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_lf_group= @yahoogroups.co.uk>; Discussion of the Lowfer (US, European, & UK) a= nd MedFer bands <lowfer@mailman.qth.net>
Verschickt: D= o, 22. Mrz 2018 16:07
Betreff: LF: DFCW

A big THANK YOU to all who ran grabbers and sent captures = last
night. It is very much appreciated! I was seen by many = in the U.S.
plus G4DMA, 2E0ILY, DL/SWL, DF2JP and DK7FC. It = is difficult to know
how propagation was but the commercial = indicators I saw in my
transmission gaps (mainly DCF39 and H= GA22) seemed to be rather poor.

The plan for= tonight is to continue as before but change to DFCW90
for b= etter readability. I will also increase the gap between
repe= titions of my call sign. I did make an error yesterday when I
said 187.5 Hertz shift. Of course it is milliHertz!

73,
Paul N1BUG

------=_Part_102344_2144811231.1521756098492--