Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w2UITuUZ005320 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2018 20:29:57 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1f1yjP-0002qp-Rg for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 30 Mar 2018 19:26:31 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1f1yjP-0002qd-Ft for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 30 Mar 2018 19:26:31 +0100 Received: from smtp10.hushmail.com ([65.39.178.143]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1f1yjM-0002I4-Ea for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 30 Mar 2018 19:26:30 +0100 Received: from smtp10.hushmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp10.hushmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 2719CC0A5B for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2018 18:26:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.hushmail.com (w2.hushmail.com [65.39.178.46]) by smtp10.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2018 18:26:23 +0000 (UTC) To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5160a919-ec1f-92d4-24d2-4af64b822b1a@n1bug.com> <6E217E2953924C5E8D36633F1C1ABE35@mal> <3f16589d49f2c34bfcf533d6628e3dd2@smtp.hushmail.com> <403E2F1E4C1A422BB11CB7647EAD2949@mal> From: Tony Baldwin Message-ID: <146196f5f911d3c74e33c0d3a2139da6@smtp.hushmail.com> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 19:26:21 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <403E2F1E4C1A422BB11CB7647EAD2949@mal> Content-Language: en-GB X-Spam-Score: 1.6 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Very true, ignore my previous factitious post. Tony. On 30/03/2018 19:12, g3kevmal@talktalk.net wrote: > It might be old news but does not alter the conditions that applied at > the time. The USA licence discussion is also old news. > g3kev > *From:* Tony Baldwin > *Sent:* Friday, March 30, 2018 5:22 PM > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > *Subject:* Re: LF: Re: CORRECTION regarding 2E0ILY-N1BUG QSO > This is old news anyway, as Ireland's ComReg changed the licence a few > years ago from "experimenters" to "amateur radio" > Almost in step with the rest of the world ;-) > Tony, EI8JK. > > On 30/03/2018 16:47, Roger Lapthorn wrote: >> Quote: >> /"The Experimenters Radio Licence allows the licensee to participate >> in what is predominately a hobby, but can be a service also, >> providing communications for emergencies and disasters when needed. >> The licensed Experimenter can use their radio equipment to >> communicate with, for example, another licensed Experimenter in the >> same town, in the same county or indeed with another Amateur >> operating from another continent."/ >> / >> / >> Mal, sounds like you are OK in Eire :-) >> 73s >> Roger G3XBM >> On 30 March 2018 at 15:12, John Rabson wrote: >> >> If I recall correctly, licences for the Irish Experimenters >> Service were issued under the ITU regulations applicable to the >> Amateur Service. >> John F5VLF >> >>> On 30 Mar 2018, at 12:42, >>> wrote: >>> Paul >>> You refer to Amateur to Amateur QSO in your postings. My EI2AE >>> licence is a Radio Experimenters Licence and NOT a Radio Amateur >>> Licence, maybe i should not be having QSO’S with Radio Amateurs. >>> One has to be flexible and use some imagination when it comes to >>> Radio Experimenters and Radio Amateur Licences, and variations >>> of such Licences >>> de mal/g3kev >> > [...] Content analysis details: (1.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 1.6 FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA Forged mail pretending to be from Mozilla X-Scan-Signature: f82786fce13a7bdfc3036eb41b44b924 Subject: Re: LF: Re: CORRECTION regarding 2E0ILY-N1BUG QSO Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------A0689E9B4AC8843D8CE98647" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------A0689E9B4AC8843D8CE98647 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Very true, ignore my previous factitious post. Tony. On 30/03/2018 19:12, g3kevmal@talktalk.net wrote: > It might be old news but does not alter the conditions that applied at > the time. The USA licence discussion is also old news. > g3kev > *From:* Tony Baldwin > *Sent:* Friday, March 30, 2018 5:22 PM > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > *Subject:* Re: LF: Re: CORRECTION regarding 2E0ILY-N1BUG QSO > This is old news anyway, as Ireland's ComReg changed the licence a few > years ago from "experimenters" to "amateur radio" > Almost in step with the rest of the world ;-) > Tony, EI8JK. > > On 30/03/2018 16:47, Roger Lapthorn wrote: >> Quote: >> /"The Experimenters Radio Licence allows the licensee to participate >> in what is predominately a hobby, but can be a service also, >> providing communications for emergencies and disasters when needed. >> The licensed Experimenter can use their radio equipment to >> communicate with, for example, another licensed Experimenter in the >> same town, in the same county or indeed with another Amateur >> operating from another continent."/ >> / >> / >> Mal, sounds like you are OK in Eire  :-) >> 73s >> Roger G3XBM >> On 30 March 2018 at 15:12, John Rabson wrote: >> >> If I recall correctly, licences for the Irish Experimenters >> Service were issued under the ITU regulations applicable to the >> Amateur Service. >> John F5VLF >> >>> On 30 Mar 2018, at 12:42, >>> wrote: >>> Paul >>> You refer to Amateur to Amateur QSO in your postings. My EI2AE >>> licence is a Radio Experimenters Licence and NOT a Radio Amateur >>> Licence, maybe i should not be having QSO’S with Radio Amateurs. >>> One has to be flexible and use some imagination when it comes to >>> Radio Experimenters and Radio Amateur Licences, and variations >>> of such Licences >>> de mal/g3kev >> > --------------A0689E9B4AC8843D8CE98647 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Very true, ignore my previous factitious post.
Tony.

On 30/03/2018 19:12, g3kevmal@talktalk.net wrote:
It might be old news but does not alter the conditions that applied at the time. The USA licence discussion is also old news.
g3kev
 
 
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2018 5:22 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: CORRECTION regarding 2E0ILY-N1BUG QSO
 
This is old news anyway, as Ireland's ComReg changed the licence a few years ago from "experimenters" to "amateur radio"
Almost in step with the rest of the world ;-)
Tony, EI8JK.

On 30/03/2018 16:47, Roger Lapthorn wrote:
Quote:
 
"The Experimenters Radio Licence allows the licensee to participate in what is predominately a hobby, but can be a service also, providing communications for emergencies and disasters when needed. The licensed Experimenter can use their radio equipment to communicate with, for example, another licensed Experimenter in the same town, in the same county or indeed with another Amateur operating from another continent."

Mal, sounds like you are OK in Eire  :-)
 
73s
Roger G3XBM
 
On 30 March 2018 at 15:12, John Rabson <john.rabson07@gmail.com> wrote:
If I recall correctly, licences for the Irish Experimenters Service were issued under the ITU regulations applicable to the Amateur Service.
 
John F5VLF

On 30 Mar 2018, at 12:42, <g3kevmal@talktalk.net> <g3kevmal@talktalk.net> wrote:
 
Paul
You refer to Amateur to Amateur QSO in your postings. My EI2AE licence is a Radio Experimenters Licence and NOT a Radio Amateur Licence, maybe i should not be having QSO’S with Radio Amateurs.
One has to be flexible and use some imagination when it comes to Radio Experimenters and Radio Amateur Licences, and variations of such Licences
de mal/g3kev
 
 
 


--------------A0689E9B4AC8843D8CE98647--