Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w1SD6a2U009033 for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 14:06:37 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1er1KS-00067J-Sg for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 12:59:28 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1er1KK-000678-Qm for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 12:59:20 +0000 Received: from mail-it0-x22b.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22b]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1er1KB-0005OB-0H for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 12:59:19 +0000 Received: by mail-it0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id w63so3353012ita.3 for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 04:59:10 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=MgaLRZBfy5dBxAUmt2oKJGdH4OiNEfVQDv4MFasT/3g=; b=p3SKa2SBHY0DrGjioGFoue8K3QRUFAALKg1yOPI0GqQpyW9Th5C1OdxqYRTLpOXUS8 QgnuS6hMhgTxAUloGVFNjkRPU2gjVBomYOPGB2oduVM4aRKFqnpfFoHC67/K/ooX0UrQ MV2vfXJO5+uz7L8+LZOGINuIuNYdnNB55qqf0kqB2goeQxXhRS5q8pObnPDrqq3/hn2B dopbEk+dVaW7sPDxmi0pzMV+1rQWMgTmkjf5lJx3Q3GZJ/3ocNb8v/Bp4hADxugh5FZf s4nyTPA80fgRV39icePrIc8T1Djpj2dMQ9vclU/5FH+DQIWNmawz9JXTjSrTPm2tJpyE krOQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=MgaLRZBfy5dBxAUmt2oKJGdH4OiNEfVQDv4MFasT/3g=; b=L7u0L5fp72ax4wn+UddBE5ZM3hKjISS2NIkStr6klVgsHqmG0qFqh+v+aT3aYAObvD XQpUedgwevFUsjq7yQ94iJkVCkPMca+FXFWaMz6oimL+jb5Uvo9hMKx2yThrXdNpEa+3 XqrDgX+L15W21miPrA/b+xibO/JEt2SxOCKzL9KydsJPCKucSrO2mInWQzlKl/YO3oKr 2gXM00ppbMEmwdQwguWH1S3jxlDUlKvLBu4af8wk5zeTlaHnMLuHMsZ1n9q2iGXjahpF iJtLRSn8SnXYScWsBPfN4u878ujEr2phxHpXEa9n0zd7LZNyr1TRyn+I1TBqJJXU/SHu i/dA== X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPASs1Rp0MDdtqZWK62ch+B73g4Y9ZlZoIXuwU2e8c0giMcW0qG4 gJuix4tWKtXsam8fDRsYhTU7T8T0x4rqYbcBaPDCpQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELszjtGAc4SQ0K9hOMHEzCVQ9XBlxpgW+SKwAT+G4n3/MdwObtFBn8ScUjaFLOVm9ygggV4xv/ng8kRTQV+hNzU= X-Received: by 10.36.65.201 with SMTP id b70mr21213962itd.12.1519822749280; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 04:59:09 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.79.140.89 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 04:59:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <5A969422.10522.430B6548@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com> From: Alex R7NT Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 15:59:08 +0300 Message-ID: To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Paul, Actualy Grabbers on 136kHz now: KL7L http://kl7l.com/Alaska.html DF6NM http://www.df6nm.de/grabber/Grabber.htm DF2JP http://www.df2jp.dxx.eu/lwgrabber.html DK7FC http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_LF_DX_Grabber.html DM4TR http://dm4tr.bplaced.net/index.php?section=LF YO/4X1RF http://qsl.net/4x1rf/yo/lfgrabber.htm EW6X http://qsl.net/ew6bn/grabber.htm RN3AUS http://rn3aus.narod.ru/grabber.html [...] Content analysis details: (1.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (r7nt.73[at]gmail.com) 0.2 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in digit (r7nt.73[at]gmail.com) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.6 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL's NS IP listed in the Spamhaus SBL blocklist [URIs: n1bug.com] 0.1 URIBL_SBL_A Contains URL's A record listed in the Spamhaus SBL blocklist [URIs: n1bug.com] 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: f45514038df04b1035abb1d5446da941 Subject: Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Tonight TX WSPR-2 and WSPR-15 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c14dd817add00566454fb7" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=5.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,HTML_20_30, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false --001a11c14dd817add00566454fb7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Paul, Actualy Grabbers on 136kHz now: KL7L http://kl7l.com/Alaska.html DF6NM http://www.df6nm.de/grabber/Grabber.htm DF2JP http://www.df2jp.dxx.eu/lwgrabber.html DK7FC http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_LF_DX_Grabber.html DM4TR http://dm4tr.bplaced.net/index.php?section=LF YO/4X1RF http://qsl.net/4x1rf/yo/lfgrabber.htm EW6X http://qsl.net/ew6bn/grabber.htm RN3AUS http://rn3aus.narod.ru/grabber.html 73! Alex R7NT 136.73.ru 2018-02-28 15:28 GMT+03:00 N1BUG : > Mike and all, > > Thank you for listening and for the reports. I was very pleased to receive > WSPR-2 and WSPR-15 reports from you and WSPR-15 report from 2E0ILY last > night. > > With the added PSU fan things seem fine with the high duty cycle. I > started out at 150 watts RF output. By morning it was closer to 200 watts > as the antenna system resistance slowly decreased during the night. WSPR-15 > gives me the opportunity to be heard with a bit weaker signal and perhaps > get a bit more distance. > > I'm using a stand alone beacon transmitter so I am not software dependent > for WSPR transmitting. I do have WSPR-X running as a test and it has been > stable running Windows 7 compatibility mode on my Windows 10 system for a > few days. However I will not declare victory just yet as it was stable for > a few days one other time without compatibility mode, then went back to > crashing every few minutes. > > Probably DFCW could go even further. I plan to try that soon but as far as > I know there are very few grabbers these days. > > 73, > Paul N1BUG FN55mf > > > > > On 02/28/2018 06:36 AM, Mike Dennison wrote: > >> Your WSPR-15 received here at 0600. Several WSPR-2 transmissions also >> seen at 0524, 0548 and 0554. >> >> Note that WSPR-X (the WSPR-15 receiving software, not to be confused >> with WSJT-X) is stable here provided I do not minimise its window. I >> am running it most of the time and certainly overnight. >> >> Mike, G3XDV >> ========== >> >> Tonight I am transmitting WSPR-15 and WSPR-2 on LF. My WSPR-15 >>> transmissions have a CW ID at the end. >>> >>> WSJT-X 1.8 and 1.9 side by side tests continue but there will be fewer >>> total decodes due to high TX duty cycle here. >>> >>> 73, >>> Paul N1BUG FN55mf >>> >> > --001a11c14dd817add00566454fb7 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Paul,
Actualy Grabbers on 136kHz now:
= DF6NM=C2=A0 =C2=A0http://www.df6nm.de/grabber/Grabber.htm
DK7FC=C2=A0 =C2=A0http= ://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_LF_DX_Grabber.html

=
73! Alex R7NT =C2=A0136.73.ru

2018-02-28 15:28 GMT+03:00 N1BUG <paul@n1bug= .com>:
Mike and all,

Thank you for listening and for the reports. I was very pleased to receive = WSPR-2 and WSPR-15 reports from you and WSPR-15 report from 2E0ILY last nig= ht.

With the added PSU fan things seem fine with the high duty cycle. I started= out at 150 watts RF output. By morning it was closer to 200 watts as the a= ntenna system resistance slowly decreased during the night. WSPR-15 gives m= e the opportunity to be heard with a bit weaker signal and perhaps get a bi= t more distance.

I'm using a stand alone beacon transmitter so I am not software depende= nt for WSPR transmitting. I do have WSPR-X running as a test and it has bee= n stable running Windows 7 compatibility mode on my Windows 10 system for a= few days. However I will not declare victory just yet as it was stable for= a few days one other time without compatibility mode, then went back to cr= ashing every few minutes.

Probably DFCW could go even further. I plan to try that soon but as far as = I know there are very few grabbers these days.

73,
Paul N1BUG FN55mf




On 02/28/2018 06:36 AM, Mike Dennison wrote:
Your WSPR-15 received here at 0600. Several WSPR-2 transmissions also
seen at 0524, 0548 and 0554.

Note that WSPR-X (the WSPR-15 receiving software, not to be confused
with WSJT-X) is stable here provided I do not minimise its window. I
am running it most of the time and certainly overnight.

Mike, G3XDV
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

Tonight I am transmitting WSPR-15 and WSPR-2 on LF. My WSPR-15
transmissions have a CW ID at the end.

WSJT-X 1.8 and 1.9 side by side tests continue but there will be fewer
total decodes due to high TX duty cycle here.

73,
Paul N1BUG FN55mf


--001a11c14dd817add00566454fb7--