Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w1KGeabp009771 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 17:40:39 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1eoArB-0004gE-E4 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 16:33:29 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1eoAr9-0004g5-GP for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 16:33:27 +0000 Received: from mail-it0-x229.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::229]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eoAr4-0006MA-KY for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 16:33:26 +0000 Received: by mail-it0-x229.google.com with SMTP id 18so13823115itj.1 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 08:33:22 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Dpjr/NpgM1c5+Gdm2jSFVuCWnVARqA5fUWrkYZNwut4=; b=IgXtlzoyw5Kw4j0jwEdoh95XmU4hO1eM/NYAypB/fJV2ZcHadVoxLaFIB9LTNpwzhQ 2QHPNRxr3MPErxM5GAgUXXMzNsjmE+qiwIoYZu6VJqIJzNOpEuTYUhsyRrtvou75/hIB ybzlVBDlo0ifzsP5PrxAxSX81+lbM+d7o57JrrbXWEivsL+mZEp09EEM6ICqkKeNK2L7 zA6JK9bz4p0pZJpxLEl/l6CLepdrMiJTTvrwycZn5F5H9fA4jg49wUeRBCQuVKsYNPU5 eRxcTmnIAufrLoN0h5vh1tYZlYoMAaDWEucV1wDSd49kU2EIAeBB7eKf11BM5TrbADka s96Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=Dpjr/NpgM1c5+Gdm2jSFVuCWnVARqA5fUWrkYZNwut4=; b=YYUKWLH0lKuVvRMGg/qbCiqiJpKmbfajzjN6FCXu8EbPKdbiHcLXSLlQJLoh+Padfj v2gdJiEhVXMda2mcVQQpbGe6zcviVSOTB/e/8Al1RQsyzCEPe2EnrwYM/az8J1ZoDRV0 AOcU0Q385ooQTt+t7bj31XTZHVsVhRvclVwTpkwl/NMqb9qyuUcMMNsjo169qd/hnF6z OylDhnjEF5Q6CsHuhrgzzpSGyuDIp0GlDw0637Fo70dnoPqUwOkaK95A2DdOP5PdLR+a smaeFKdDx2POfMcI8hjIh6uKe3AY/aNA/j9yObydM1xSosVPZhRWh/3eFm1T/tHzRytC lR7w== X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPCYgN1Y5m5RLMrZYNL7NsI37z5wI1cF+m27KGbk1nPAACNRgUCM h29gjKmwO29XAzD18RPVTb6SDZJA/6sEq0w3lPgqwQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x2248etZAeI1cRYEBrjUFW4BA36EfaWp4P31usVHElF0qKieyxfF1cgCAa+zRRc0LjThPELhlxeqX+CDX8GpO+jg= X-Received: by 10.36.211.145 with SMTP id n139mr857813itg.29.1519144400411; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 08:33:20 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.79.140.89 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 08:33:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Alex R7NT Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 19:33:19 +0300 Message-ID: To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Rob, I believe that WSPR15 is more viable on 136 at low powers (up to 1W ERP) on long QRB (compared with WSPR2) :) It's like comparing OP8 (~WSPR2) and OP32 (~WSPR32). But OP8 died a few years ago on 136 [...] Content analysis details: (0.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.2 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in digit (r7nt.73[at]gmail.com) 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (r7nt.73[at]gmail.com) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 896f9ee4f10c5db37812c155e804756d Subject: Re: LF: WSPR-15 on 136 KHz Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1145e1345960440565a75e22" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=5.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,HTML_40_50, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false --001a1145e1345960440565a75e22 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Rob, I believe that WSPR15 is more viable on 136 at low powers (up to 1W ERP) on long QRB (compared with WSPR2) :) It's like comparing OP8 (~WSPR2) and OP32 (~WSPR32). But OP8 died a few years ago on 136 73! Alex R7NT 136.73.ru 2018-02-20 15:32 GMT+03:00 Rob Renoud : > > Two T/A spots from Geoff, G0LUJ, last evening on 2200M at -35dB and -37dB > show WSPR-15 to be a viable mode on 136 KHz. I will continue nightly > WSPR-15 transmissions for the next week or so. > > Does anyone have an early release of WSJT-X with the slow JT9 modes > included? I believe that WSJT-X V. 0.95, r3243 released about 04/2013 may > be one release that includes the slow JT9 modes. > > 73, > Rob - K3RWR > --001a1145e1345960440565a75e22 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Rob,
I believe that WSPR15 is more viable on 136 at lo= w powers (up to 1W ERP) on long QRB (compared with WSPR2) :)
= It's like comparing OP8 (~WSPR2) and OP32 (~WSPR32).=C2=A0
But OP8 died a few years ago on 136

73! Alex R7NT =C2=A0136.73.ru

2018-02= -20 15:32 GMT+03:00 Rob Renoud <k3rwr@md.metrocast.net>= :

Two T/A spots from Geoff, G0LUJ, last evening on 2200M at -35dB and -37dB s= how WSPR-15 to be a viable mode on 136 KHz.=C2=A0 I will continue nightly W= SPR-15 transmissions for the next week or so.

Does anyone have an early release of WSJT-X with the slow JT9 modes include= d?=C2=A0 I believe that WSJT-X V. 0.95, r3243 released about 04/2013=C2=A0 = may be one release that includes the slow JT9 modes.

73,
Rob - K3RWR
--001a1145e1345960440565a75e22--