Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w13Kt0mp007988 for ; Sat, 3 Feb 2018 21:55:02 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1ei4le-0008Tr-P4 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2018 20:50:34 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1ei4l0-0008Td-HX for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2018 20:49:54 +0000 Received: from mail-oi0-x22f.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22f]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ei4kw-0000Jy-U7 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2018 20:49:52 +0000 Received: by mail-oi0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id j15so15465650oii.5 for ; Sat, 03 Feb 2018 12:49:50 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=YPBE0TDYj2qzTVn2aZYc9HbmJ2ykwsqRFh71wvu2LhY=; b=Z3ktdoktpnlR6Eycf6yYgXzJJ65vH6DrDbzPjLJAn6bGISAhm1a+XDwCTOVyQgPiF1 P8DuuMRmIBHYN5lytBK6kExJYJ2Q5HkwcB3gX7vP0mk80FMaiMOCSXUBQTrI7oTXxRBV HhFOuyxZRIEnNPFvjyzwVtmen6YrED/pz2bOhYD1qSO/Cl1iW/D+M8znhKzP4HkucQel 9lQj+Ym61YSrLsym2mhnpJEoyBIgkdVSfw3BSn9OKhygLFpfftnus0TR38L8Eklf0fsg oNSBi5+6IktWuBfC9oPTpxWJhCpPaF4lOXdTZaqNki5gCCtzJTps4KnMQcpIgJLZjn66 gmmA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=YPBE0TDYj2qzTVn2aZYc9HbmJ2ykwsqRFh71wvu2LhY=; b=B/DBgq7ksVQ+OBScSMgDloxjWQpYxvlqR9byERC0B8TrvwIT3Ug7IU3CqE8ebkFbaq cDtNdklhtdEO8TIGtoDueBM7KAlMaa5Iifvj4+Ng3tFaUjwesnEiG3t9SIW2VqAOCKfe LxxjC6K5NSRVYXWm1gSSDZiJ4YkyHsolxqOKZIiBwmp5hEnnq9exRt741Fr/mbzQeYDj Qgdplc+LQ9ELKoXysdB1LJKcEYsfuQGVO76WatewFWJRTb+frVCPSjdrykQ9wAtqiHFU 09l+O3vmYEgLYW+qEhPp0pThi3BXOHUT5trMuDSJyP30vg/HXHJQhyYVO6Mz2HnNC1pR f4oQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxyteK9aqjBToYoEftMqXFvChLZjeMC0w5P9jA0JECukHMPmZjXpt/ GYtDkKvty11nMYqCTDoyUDYHs+nzL2HrjsH8Y+KWDA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x225zOu1wUYsuZkUeuBxG1ylFMBnF+dpc+TS8ssPGKT04Y320LWAoMxykj3h4EFs2TBg2DrNRPY7rCXEZ0aZmNfc= X-Received: by 10.202.180.133 with SMTP id d127mr30582301oif.328.1517690988761; Sat, 03 Feb 2018 12:49:48 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.157.28.165 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Feb 2018 12:49:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <81A271A406C64EFF8597518D025C9435@PCDaheim> From: Roger Lapthorn Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2018 20:49:48 +0000 Message-ID: To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: What I meant was the noise floor *rises* dramatically when charging the shack laptop's battery. That is why I use the (charged) internal batteries when looking on 136kHz and 472kHz. 73s Roger G3XBM On 2 February 2018 at 20:24, Roger Lapthorn wrote: [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rogerlapthorn[at]gmail.com) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 5934134de2d93cab1d5fc440b67de82f Subject: Re: [english 97%] LF: 136kHz RX Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113c2c3e439561056454f874" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE, TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false --001a113c2c3e439561056454f874 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" What I meant was the noise floor *rises* dramatically when charging the shack laptop's battery. That is why I use the (charged) internal batteries when looking on 136kHz and 472kHz. 73s Roger G3XBM On 2 February 2018 at 20:24, Roger Lapthorn wrote: > Yes, basically the noise level drops dramatically when charging the > internal battery pack. I am sure I can get the external noise floor lower. > This has got worse in the last few years. > > 73s > Roger G3XBM > > On 2 February 2018 at 19:53, DL3JJ HOME wrote: > >> Hallo Roge ! >> >> Is the noise of your power supply so strong that you use battery ? >> >> 73 >> Ralf >> >> *From:* Roger Lapthorn >> *Sent:* Friday, February 02, 2018 7:53 PM >> *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org ; rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk >> *Subject:* [english 97%] LF: 136kHz RX >> >> After sorting out the issue with my shack PC battery not charging, I am *now >> *monitoring 136kHz WSPR RX and 136kHz OPERA. The shack PC battery (to >> reduce noise) should be good until late tonight. >> >> I'll probably NOT be looking after about 2300z. >> >> Let's hope I spot some tonight. >> >> 73s >> Roger G3XBM >> > > --001a113c2c3e439561056454f874 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
What I meant was the noise floor rises dramati= cally when charging the shack laptop's battery. That is why I use the (= charged) internal batteries when looking on 136kHz and 472kHz.
73s
Roger G3XBM

On 2 February 2018 at 20:24, Roger Lapthor= n <rogerlapthorn@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes, basically the noise level drops= dramatically when charging the internal battery pack. I am sure I can get = the external noise floor lower. This has got worse in the last few years.

73s
Roger G3XBM

On 2 February 2018 at 19:53, DL3JJ HOME <dl3jj@dl3jj.de> wrote:
Hallo Roge !
=C2=A0
Is the noise of your power supply so strong that you use battery ?
=C2=A0
73
Ralf
=C2=A0
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2018 7:53 PM
Subject: [english 97%] LF: 136kHz RX
=C2=A0
After sorting out the issue with my shack PC battery not charging, I a= m=20 now monitoring 136kHz WSPR RX and 136kHz OPERA. The shack PC battery= (to=20 reduce noise) should be good until late tonight.
=C2=A0
I'll probably NOT be looking after about 2300z.
=C2=A0
Let's hope I spot some tonight.
=C2=A0
73s
Roger G3XBM


--001a113c2c3e439561056454f874--