Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w13MErNY008237 for ; Sat, 3 Feb 2018 23:14:56 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1ei5zj-0000NF-Hl for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2018 22:09:11 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1ei5zL-0000N6-Iv for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2018 22:08:47 +0000 Received: from mail-oi0-x234.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c06::234]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ei5zI-0000dm-5W for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2018 22:08:45 +0000 Received: by mail-oi0-x234.google.com with SMTP id x21so5612685oie.13 for ; Sat, 03 Feb 2018 14:08:43 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=tIOTrtgkJRDawhKJ2Mbl0Ybd58Z9J9PK3sPqOIDGlis=; b=RmR6pR/lBBi7Xgfd4y7N+Z2jekWeAgvHCSIbVyiSp18oqlfN6M4Cg2Hix7dCqHt54k vlME29PZUYFB/gtGkqjUL7zGo0XGSiS0o1HMvbHJqIyBLAjDArhYZ092Vxdkhji0RWyK WTVxdRvZh+sLFaVMn4+nCa4vZvXlxUHy8tp2uf+rzZ3FMspJeSbAG8EpNF0a+YvqMfS3 Z+x5gsxFd6VLPJ0globcPJLQ6JEJORm++zsaCnaZElVQyw63DUVPVkSwvLtjL/Doh4CA 1G+Wwtggpa1u2gAeNMzqqfYc7AsyY3bbFqhlOYkzDSda7paMrKP5g08GXlXI3SSl1WR8 uKPg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=tIOTrtgkJRDawhKJ2Mbl0Ybd58Z9J9PK3sPqOIDGlis=; b=fH90PkyB+HDDVGLtjwZ3NhtFacdZihm68z6RuUprodBgG+xVXyV0VAKckJhVF5yeX8 epDzzg6tCW4eC0vBW+mV/WZcgwK0OKrlifYk50V36c/j75j0PjZOJT6TmSd9T8SAYBnd GXYa6kMFkEL4QqinU89mXy7doEEmEPs4nYxb17RJz587nICsGBGz/cK+H/DCvnOAl/xD i0jUYieCTWK7PeuLoj0T2oBhwokVVGFtTKr3nMG1Sp9cW4K/rJLB8huQj3/gGBNNGlXB UflgQfG9EJnL2+kc1dReKXtTdjCQ2y3j7LbdZNzDogrzObmIE3EXoG7DGmUezfynCbhx 4f7w== X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytdWBmiuxTYe8Fqr9/dIECXFDy1CeS8WjI17hfivwdO1ZuBFdItO GVns36CTSrQlGzIM0xSR9r9s27m8GA6tG2A6SOQsDQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x22536TM+ZAHXyjoUlkO9xI8nQLXz2y06bnefywSHkPxxCylH6pkdEIgM/fzP+auAgr+M1e9CRNEAtYb2W0hz7u0= X-Received: by 10.202.105.84 with SMTP id e81mr19241884oic.305.1517695721898; Sat, 03 Feb 2018 14:08:41 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.157.28.165 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Feb 2018 14:08:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Roger Lapthorn Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2018 22:08:41 +0000 Message-ID: To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: An interesting, if obvious, thing I have noticed on 136kHz is as follows: G3XIZ (46km) shows a maximum variation in S/N of 3dB whereas 2E0ILY (209km) shows a variation of 14dB S/N. I assume propagation from 2E0ILY depends more on conditions than G3XIZ who is far closer. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rogerlapthorn[at]gmail.com) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 5f132ffce194fb93f2267a462d849f2b Subject: Re: LF: 136kHz RX Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1141b6246188aa0564561261" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE, TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false --001a1141b6246188aa0564561261 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" An interesting, if obvious, thing I have noticed on 136kHz is as follows: G3XIZ (46km) shows a maximum variation in S/N of 3dB whereas 2E0ILY (209km) shows a variation of 14dB S/N. I assume propagation from 2E0ILY depends more on conditions than G3XIZ who is far closer. Gosh, this must seem *so* *basic* to the experts here! To me, it is just "learning by doing" ....and fun. 73s Roger G3XBM On 3 February 2018 at 17:57, Roger Lapthorn wrote: > Once again I am looking on 136kHz WSPR and OPERA. It was quite late > yesterday when I realised I had the *wrong antenna* connected! This > evening I can confirm I have the *right *antenna! > > If you are on 136kHz this evening I might spot you. > > 73s > Roger G3XBM > --001a1141b6246188aa0564561261 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
An interesting, if obvious, thing I have noticed on 1= 36kHz is as follows: G3XIZ (46km) shows a maximum variation in S/N of 3dB w= hereas 2E0ILY (209km) shows a variation of 14dB S/N. I assume propagation f= rom 2E0ILY depends more on conditions than G3XIZ who is far closer.
<= div>
Gosh, this must seem so basic to th= e experts here! To me, it is just "learning by doing" ....and fun= .

73s
Roger G3XBM

On 3 February 2018 at 17:57= , Roger Lapthorn <rogerlapthorn@gmail.com> wrote:
<= blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px= #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Once again I am looking= on 136kHz WSPR and OPERA. It was quite late yesterday when I realised I ha= d the wrong antenna connected! This evening I can confirm I have the= right antenna!

If you are on 136kHz this e= vening I might spot you.

73s
Roger G3XBM=

--001a1141b6246188aa0564561261--