Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w14AqB7g010166 for ; Sun, 4 Feb 2018 11:52:14 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1eiHpa-00046O-QY for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 10:47:30 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1eiHpa-00046F-0u for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 10:47:30 +0000 Received: from mout.perfora.net ([74.208.4.194]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eiHpX-0002bd-4m for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 10:47:28 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.127] ([72.224.254.201]) by mrelay.perfora.net (mreueus001 [74.208.5.2]) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0M1HiQ-1f1t4s0fsG-00t4gU for ; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 11:47:22 +0100 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: From: N1BUG Message-ID: <9d58deff-f2c8-d84c-6342-6d5e7c10bda5@n1bug.com> Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2018 05:47:21 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:D/gukWzB/90ME7XmY6UYFnwuLU9rtfLJ1SJWNcWrUU3gEvv89mK 8U/tAiraVJeOCeE5If0jPmX+SX8ylNOBXQBJKoI8zLA5aMuEx0Wzx6ct5Qwf4I6+ScfR0x0 fc7t3Mpw1HjU5DPxNzfF2nos2koPOZJZrsEAT8wozcM9MzTmhy2FNq/etGf+AUXwxF+ouiD euppqzZ9Qkj4Ntdmcx1mQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:nU7nW4rCd8M=:RTbg/553V/1lWrURO4LEiK X7K5BfWRQRQ+2hEr4X8blLYSUd21+lrPIdMGVBT/kjz2ncil2NZ1FcUHOuZngVJ+nutBKfWse ER7s1k84Gggv8viydP05JmWuN0b4IjeX56BSr/XkEbWfJtbtr4lxs4pBWBu7qzaErr2KFewCV wJ/nK92JvcojN/tznS6ARDrFkjNPCHpYkrsE4QzJAnQ056YC4BaUIkLKHzAWCFp3gux0HRWC7 vReIwgVtvDeqo+KGDFZ5+bC2su6klE+Z3og9tJccKGReiqYm/QQUYqFwakZaS+GdqVTk2O8Uq JQHgLSkAnVrz7hOTa+yaTFAZ0n0pjzSrNcPgNcCcpEoWwF+JATqb5IB8DSDpZanoc4rCoDu/b 7/hzjYCy7uqtMXoqNNVIquITQpwCTVJ9AlkGnM1eXtWGIXYIiP4WcCLK4DL6F0TF6Ib5ELb1y 5SR8AV4S6PGRzWFayScXVlzgeMTYwF/KqEbBVFTF6zdA4c+aZUNZQ8wbEmGG75N6s69YZJSrN 4325IXUXNJgukNqdV73PlgI2uuN53ORwxGzhzErncatYCfffJ2rH0lbnsILUZcHDrpZ5ZPMJr gOSYvF2xG2nkJNsBRVr/T0DEeNwVi00XnyLm9VI7E6Vb+mnD9R3T+OJPLxOZNygYFBmxhowpD dx1OiogzDwkKZZJ7SBMUEYLmlFx9pnGDSBzHPFd705ztVX+27kiqg0EwwA0eivsp8IQtSFnoP x8T8ehyaLLnPdMpJxJtYS0JCUOApJ6bNhLMpQA+OrMNzmpeGgGM4PIH0dOI= X-Spam-Score: 1.6 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Just think how many trans-Atlantic QSOs could be made. Some, like myself are very interested but the primary problem is no one awake on the east side of the pond at the right times! I have seen signals strong enough for normal CW only a few times. JT9 would be easy and requires only about 3 dB more signal to decode than WSPR2. I am looking for information on QSO operating procedures for QRSS. I have only seen it used for beaconing. [...] Content analysis details: (1.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.6 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject is all capitals X-Scan-Signature: 5c335215f1b3de26d890ee84d49616ce Subject: Re: LF: MF/630M Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Just think how many trans-Atlantic QSOs could be made. Some, like myself are very interested but the primary problem is no one awake on the east side of the pond at the right times! I have seen signals strong enough for normal CW only a few times. JT9 would be easy and requires only about 3 dB more signal to decode than WSPR2. I am looking for information on QSO operating procedures for QRSS. I have only seen it used for beaconing. I've been off MF for a while as I put up a temporary HF antenna to work the Bouvet DXpedition and it severely messed up tuning of the MF antenna. Now that the Bouvet trip has been aborted I will be taking that antenna down and returning to MF as soon as I get a reasonable weather window. I will likely be on MF for a week or so before moving to LF. 73, Paul N1BUG On 02/04/2018 05:05 AM, mal hamilton wrote: > Last nite results good but not unusual, had reports from > > AA1A, KA1R, VE1YY > > Transatlantic contacts seem a regular occurrence at present on MF > between the UK and N.America > > Most operators are using WSPR but more CW both normal and QRSS would > be welcome like it used to be some years ago, ie real QSO mode > > 73 de mal/g3kev/io94sh