Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w1DD4AHD015296 for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 14:04:12 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1elaBn-0001fx-1r for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 13:00:03 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1elaBm-0001fn-OQ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 13:00:02 +0000 Received: from mout.perfora.net ([74.208.4.196]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1elaBi-0004dn-Jn for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 13:00:01 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.129] ([72.224.254.201]) by mrelay.perfora.net (mreueus001 [74.208.5.2]) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0LpMWp-1eI2jL3DlN-00f8vN; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 13:59:50 +0100 To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" , "rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk" , 600MRG@mailman.qth.net From: N1BUG Message-ID: <9d0461bd-fc77-ef15-1c30-9c5f9341c2ad@n1bug.com> Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 07:59:48 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Language: en-US X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:eIWlqlRE0Vcj3WZjL6V3k2ywxA2kQxtI48FrMGyJpxcnGXGddQe Q6FdOXD7nCleLgQYpsORqsbj8uZkR3EVqQiDSGq0eWbz4cdqa2dpA9MSqUV2L3ftgoHZUIu KKIxGhNt5zbEoR9Qbz6jOGMN+2K57uZdhahiMNGNdr+AWOppA0iai04fchwl0NkdApy5K35 RCYpwYNBZtkCGN641iJLQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:OjJsWeW1D40=:1yioCcYG+G7D+sAM8URhHs XshH71zHWK2z7xCu4cAF6EvV1pV3ltx7Pg7mxbolQh+ULMkMxSB68h7PlZ9n1nuGabghkC1DK AYAsPL6+5hCqkuFvoEwCfKMLIDJuxKSYva7RpNraDiwgzP74+lMDGciI0y4Bw/YdREolcQoX2 PCcqqbXx2Ss+Onb6+PZT8mCHrFe3coaY80ov/VCU7CGlEow9uheJ0G/TGYBdlmYZF51wrTi3F +A//uXq3cnJamUJsEBYqOiKhVHY340EAdrr7P3z7I39lkvAlqIyXpHE6fEj5/1GvuJkG9H7T5 blyIAKT04VUzpB1b2W1JnKF6iHHZNl8EzVYFkwPCqFZq0iKdel8z6t8tmI7KqLi9ZwUteLeB6 gclJSFRwo3TohD9U3a6KaQhf3tfXHRBUPhFyOGXei8y3hSrIMJ6xneszlNpR1M/jLJ/D82KHs 0WlJ/dakHpVD3JTDFIoukfqTmuxGwd8GrStMHyr3mQTTb+krUMRGisZ3YkQa/RsAPd6Q1b0od SGQmKuVhJA9sHstG3SEkdBg8z5ZuyzcjdVUmzuZVDhIxFfEaksppdq7e48BUm3hCNHIE1njn4 ozJbdDQ+Xc0zYasZcx5jO7KzypFXwN+Qs+gBpfCyAiQZRAQhJpiSGXCifI6n6p7t2Un00fQHX s+Ab87NqxB8ROroqseLctlN4hGh7WZOS1pya+nNiPYY7VPYFLLu4cRSTLT0eF8PwR1vnSx0a1 tAfJHaGCJgO0DL6ilxP+G97iMq5/t05uaKIU+XE4qkoCCYbxA98vXTHvOjc= X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: We had decided to try JT9 attempts early in the window but also just before European sunrise, starting at 0530z. Conditions were not good early but during the night WSPR signals came up to very good levels. [...] Content analysis details: (0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.6 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL's NS IP listed in the Spamhaus SBL blocklist [URIs: www.n1bug.com] 0.1 URIBL_SBL_A Contains URL's A record listed in the Spamhaus SBL blocklist [URIs: www.n1bug.com] X-Scan-Signature: 0a4643e586472c13187d293ec5d096c2 Subject: LF: MF: EU<>NA last night Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.0 required=5.0 tests=SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false We had decided to try JT9 attempts early in the window but also just before European sunrise, starting at 0530z. Conditions were not good early but during the night WSPR signals came up to very good levels. NO3M and myself were calling CQ. I saw PA0A call CQ a little higher up and moved up to work him. Albert sent me a report but then lost my signal and completed with NO3M. Albert's signal peaked -20 during that time. A little later I had him at -13 on WSPR. A few minutes later I found him calling CQ on JT9 again. We were able to complete a QSO but his signal was never better than -22. I saw a weak signal on my CQ frequency a few times but could not decode it. Could this have been OR7T calling me? Rik had reported that he heard me several times. Even with better conditions and good peak signal levels, QSB was a major problem... still quite deep with short peaks. I do not see how QRSS at any speed could have survived this. Note: I had some problems with my internet service during the night. I've just seen that not all of my WSPR spots were uploaded. Would anyone like to try tomorrow morning? 73, Paul N1BUG FN55mf http://www.n1bug.com/lfmf/