Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w1LKvZSj014912 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 21:57:38 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1eobNp-0008CH-1V for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 20:52:57 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1eobNo-0008C8-9s for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 20:52:56 +0000 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eobNl-0004XG-IU for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 20:52:55 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E6B520EB9 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 21:52:49 +0100 (CET) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1519246370; bh=0z4Bu2sTaqNTmNoFYIsVAzrR7qcdDuVaqvW4aArMPEU=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=RjMeeTayUV5XoiYBwyZN93Ah/8tHIw3bjj2rgbUCLg6OxdJoW9bNXFHaLWDbgxVMr VUfgD2fhVfpSPRIMS2BNXzmFGICyMj+byQKl4lc9wO/FiGAeM7+/zcIDVFHmQMpGua giThZvpqGUAaizGcT7G1p/Gl9Kob+Y0yetWrY43MTuJBDBJNphdTvy97+pH1PXcy4e 3/jbDVO7jkriGvscdQAvjxa6crRA1UMM84p6fe9yZc4kjSxcNQTafreB1k9hLcCjxt plQ1MT0cC15nkyWUK9arNr4wnYzWNCny5xeCN27y71k0/pKqiuba+EyLIQCydywgHF IKyoiMURf6dIg== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3zmqRs2CnNz9s0F for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 21:52:22 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5A8DDC05.9070906@posteo.de> Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 21:52:21 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <7df217d8-5a67-d4f4-6829-d710eb506cf3@n1bug.com> In-Reply-To: <7df217d8-5a67-d4f4-6829-d710eb506cf3@n1bug.com> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: There are issues, i.e. sidebands from DCF39! Best is stay above 1618 Hz, i.e. 137.618 kHz. 73, Stefan Am 21.02.2018 21:29, schrieb N1BUG: > What are good and bad WSPR frequencies in EU for 137 kHz? I believe > there are issues with QRM from / to OPERA but I can find no > information on exactly what range OPERA uses. > > I have been running on 137.445 but tonight I am trying to run WSPR-2 > and WSPR-15 alternating. The 70 Hz frequency difference is not so good > for my amplifier due to the antenna tuning compromise. Would moving > WSPR-2 up to the high end of the range work? Maybe 137.585? > > 73, > Paul N1BUG FN55mf > [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 4ead635eadbaebfaa92cfec77deb715d Subject: Re: LF: WSPR Frequencies in EU ? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false There are issues, i.e. sidebands from DCF39! Best is stay above 1618 Hz, i.e. 137.618 kHz. 73, Stefan Am 21.02.2018 21:29, schrieb N1BUG: > What are good and bad WSPR frequencies in EU for 137 kHz? I believe > there are issues with QRM from / to OPERA but I can find no > information on exactly what range OPERA uses. > > I have been running on 137.445 but tonight I am trying to run WSPR-2 > and WSPR-15 alternating. The 70 Hz frequency difference is not so good > for my amplifier due to the antenna tuning compromise. Would moving > WSPR-2 up to the high end of the range work? Maybe 137.585? > > 73, > Paul N1BUG FN55mf >