Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w1LBDlFx012952 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 12:13:50 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1eoSF2-0006Ml-9p for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 11:07:16 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1eoSF1-0006Mc-Pf for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 11:07:15 +0000 Received: from know-smtprelay-omc-6.server.virginmedia.net ([80.0.253.70]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eoSEz-0001en-1v for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 11:07:14 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([82.31.180.39]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id oSEuegi9jT4DJoSEve1Ggj; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 11:07:09 +0000 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=ntlworld.com Result=Signature OK X-Originating-IP: [82.31.180.39] X-Authenticated-User: X-Spam: 0 X-Authority: v=2.3 cv=NZbIKVL4 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=sVtWtjZQCe36+A3m2HleAg==:117 a=sVtWtjZQCe36+A3m2HleAg==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=x7bEGLp0ZPQA:10 a=8CyW6HnHt6KUlzH5R38A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ntlworld.com; s=meg.feb2017; t=1519211229; bh=IuSlZsT8RCsgw+HUwXeMyR3glM6UQynSk3Dxhqk4wBM=; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Reply-to:In-reply-to:References; b=Up7JsTb8Li27fTwArwVDd1eKa9sSzmLz+LPToS/Qv+RyqqeTuUc/Vh8u3xnr49/HQ Qky1oF8tQhbrR1yVl1G/HVvNd0T/FFP63OsrMKzjZ4TPCmVoA8IG/IV4txJVrYprbQ m/WtY7drqj1grBK3GP1XovP0B6rJuF8XHeai01yB0/9z/gGkWbL2i/CvGoyrsLF7ZW QCB5nlFgoA2grTpbjhGfnatmMfIFT8SWAaR65NkPKoTPWX+MIuaxQEud6VRw1C1nqw 0kRC0Q+Yn5AIGYLzrlBGHy9Oi4wmN2C6iMofMh4JV1VfZ7QgCQCdWu6YmBvv1fzv/q g8CeAtlJH8iOA== From: "Mike Dennison" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 11:07:07 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <5A8D52DB.12144.1EE48BB5@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com> In-reply-to: References: X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.72.572) Content-description: Mail message body X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfOg6xeI/+wohumfMBRP77rRz0t1WWAyKVIowps+7V0ECMXDl0/HeUWsXMab4Ng++N/tt9RBp2Fy0J3tdzswmPC9vzTxZ0PyzUXfSVlX0zYU2eH3T5qjo WlemEwuq/AB5xXHIJoAoPE1j+W22agyxtec1IneUx1Tse3fm1U4u7giatd4odm/y758I+hXASuzOOA== X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: I was monitoring last night but WSPR-X crashed, so no results. I found I was not using WinXP compatibility mode, just the basic Win10. Now it's running 'compatibly' so I am testing it again. Mike, G3XDV ========== [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: bb61bee384896e075004ae5ec954ddd2 Subject: Re: LF: WSPR-15 on 136 KHz Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false I was monitoring last night but WSPR-X crashed, so no results. I found I was not using WinXP compatibility mode, just the basic Win10. Now it's running 'compatibly' so I am testing it again. Mike, G3XDV ========== > > Two T/A spots from Geoff, G0LUJ, last evening on 2200M at -35dB and > -37dB show WSPR-15 to be a viable mode on 136 KHz. I will continue > nightly WSPR-15 transmissions for the next week or so. > > Does anyone have an early release of WSJT-X with the slow JT9 modes > included? I believe that WSJT-X V. 0.95, r3243 released about 04/2013 > may be one release that includes the slow JT9 modes. > > 73, > Rob - K3RWR > > > >