Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w1MI8KjR019297 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 19:08:21 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1eovDF-0005m2-OA for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 18:03:21 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1eovDF-0005lr-7z for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 18:03:21 +0000 Received: from resqmta-ch2-08v.sys.comcast.net ([2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:40]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eovDB-0002mf-Vq for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 18:03:19 +0000 Received: from resomta-ch2-16v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.112]) by resqmta-ch2-08v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTP id ovCuecI5g0P0WovD8e0Ebc; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 18:03:14 +0000 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=comcast.net Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20161114; t=1519322594; bh=5wtTPXX2NF3Ej7MqZdLzY0OLu9qpWCf62onPuIFoIRU=; h=Received:Received:From:Subject:To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID; b=aYz+0D519iNYvcqWlZxhKx0dT10+VPwrGESiEwRTUUJy57dzDnktD0puwaMJYTEKZ XuXNh6/YTAas56D1c13/XsptiU9AwlUYm8jdnNP8yKLHPU28/OBLovCRrKBPr+j4m9 XH00A7Z14lETP9exTDbPr2ydBFcSbx2k5mwEAnQyw7PJEWBdBNTiG1MU+uEMLHYe3o 7hCj8quF/8ATWyJMwKvRWD6I5NukkGffz9y2EcYICED2wxoVoYrS4yJcl4NQrkU0jT asEEWnBrP4aG9xEG3uo93+rSYocwb5sQTnXsXTQ8/hFZubGoU+j/KognOMWnMcJfA+ B0E63sUVSHqvg== Received: from Optiplex980-PC ([73.4.253.141]) by resomta-ch2-16v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP id ovD6esF2ESal9ovD6eGt5U; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 18:03:14 +0000 From: "jrusgrove@comcast.net" To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1UQO6rApSa.29KiLG1g1Mw@optiplex980-pc> <161bac4d0f6-b52-1d0@webjas-vab168.srv.aolmail.net> <005701d3ac02$7693b4e0$63bb1ea0$@comcast.net> Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 13:03:17 -0500 Message-ID: <1UQO7tMvCm.4a0eBTX0QI3@optiplex980-pc> In-Reply-To: <005701d3ac02$7693b4e0$63bb1ea0$@comcast.net> User-Agent: OEClassic/2.7 (Win7; P; 2017-02-12) X-Mailer: OEClassic/2.7 (Win7; P; 2017-02-12) X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfCLBAVGI1RlDk8Y+kMOou5oCHOB2ClYLsu1Pn6hZsW66z9H8WCTSlr5/7FaeBYPYM7Zo22kSABqS267fGya7nWV+TRIiOBaqkluWwMFr6/u9BynvFY71 p8NikM3xWlA85LFvuGjO8GuHe7+zfLLRpzqqSvWhp3uq61Gid7FRaT9T+iVEeiWooqH3lvNTWfwLXw== X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Jim To be more clear 0621 file = 0621 UT. Jay [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (jrusgrove[at]comcast.net) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 903ce439c63f3d003fd332ac7920b8c3 Subject: Re: LF: K7PO testing 8270.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="KsclJJwyDfDJBYANSK2LHPvmGM=_57NUfe" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_60_70,HTML_MESSAGE, MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR,TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format --KsclJJwyDfDJBYANSK2LHPvmGM=_57NUfe Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Jim To be more clear 0621 file =3D 0621 UT. Jay ----- Original Message ----- From: Reply-To: To: Sent: 2/22/2018 12:27:42 PM Subject: RE: LF: K7PO testing 8270.0 Paul reported: =E2=80=9CI think the transmission must have stopped. Pe= rhaps sometime=20 around 12:00 UT yesterday (21st).=E2=80=9D Jay reported: =E2=80=9CCarrier disappears=E2=80=A6 during daylight fil= es=E2=80=A6 (approximately at)=20 file start time=E2=80=A6 (between) 0621 - 0821=E2=80=9D =20 Jay, do your =E2=80=9C0621=E2=80=9D and =E2=80=9C0821=E2=80=9D refer t= o 11:21 UT and 13:21 UT on the 21st? =20 Hoping to extract Ward=E2=80=99s signal and guessing that integrating = from 01:30 UT=20 (21st) to 11:00 UT (21st) would be best. Does this sound right? =20 73, =20 Jim AA5BW =20 From: hvanesce@comcast.net [mailto:hvanesce@comcast.net]=20 Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2018 10:44 PM To: 'rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org' Subject: RE: LF: K7PO testing 8270.0 =20 Integrated 30 minutes of 8270 Hz data from Georgia and Alaska receiver= s; based=20 on Jay=E2=80=99s report 30 minutes was much too short; guessing 8 hour= s or more would=20 have been more appropriate. Will try longer integration times tomorrow= =2E =20 Any recommendations on a stacking method? =20 Also processing 0130 Feb 21 UT and later data from a Florida receiver.= =20 =20 How long will steady carrier continue? Ward mentioned a second day of=20= transmission, but if that is not a full second day, or if steady carri= er=20 changes to EbNaut, knowing Feb 21/22 steady-carrier start-stop time wo= uld be=20 helpful. =20 73, =20 Jim AA5BW =20 =20 From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner- rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Ward K7PO Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2018 6:49 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: K7PO testing 8270.0 =20 Jay, Thanks for the report. After the shaky start a week or so ago, things = seem to=20 be working OK now. Fun stuff! I'm already set up for EbNaut tx, but will probably test with a carrie= r just a little longer. Ward =20 =20 =20 -----Original Message----- From: jrusgrove To: rsgb_lf_group Sent: Wed, Feb 21, 2018 4:19 pm Subject: LF: K7PO testing 8270.0 Ward =20 It appears that your carrier was easily received in CT last night. Usi= ng the same file as Stefan's=20 transmission your carrier (*) was detected immediately at the 0,0,0,0 = phase=20 trial ... and improved as the decoding process continued. Carrier S/N = peaked=20 13.36 dB in 35.2 uHz.=20 I'll check other files, including daytime files, later tonight. =20 Thanks very much for the Dreamers Band carrier! Looking forward to an = actual message. =20 Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 =20 =20 =20 ----- Original Message ----- From: Ward K7PO Reply-To: To: Sent: 2/21/2018 3:17:10 PM Subject: Re: LF: K7PO testing 8270.0 Paul, Thanks for the report! You made my day. I'll=20 leave it on for another 24 hours, at least. Ward K7PO/WH2XXP =20 =20 =20 -----Original Message----- From: Paul Nicholson To: rsgb_lf_group Sent: Wed, Feb 21, 2018 11:27 am Subject: Re: LF: K7PO testing 8270.0 > Testing now from ~0100Z until ?? 8270.0 800 ma A terrific signal at Forest, VA, 3070km. Day and night. A sharp line exactly on frequency. Will post some plots later or tomorrow. So far, no detection at Todmorden... hopefully the carrier continues. -- Paul Nicholson -- --KsclJJwyDfDJBYANSK2LHPvmGM=_57NUfe Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline
Jim
 
To be more clear 0621 file =3D 0621 UT.
 
Jay
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: 2/22/2018 12:27:42 PM
Subject: RE: LF: K7PO testing 8270.0

Paul reported: = =E2=80=9CI think the transmission must have stopped. Perhaps so= metime around 12:00 UT yesterday (21st).=E2=80=9D

Jay reported: =E2=80=9CCarrier disappears=E2=80=A6 during daylight files=E2=80=A6=   (approximately at) file start time=E2=80=A6 (between) 0621= - 0821=E2=80=9D

 

Jay, do your =E2=80=9C0621=E2=80=9D= and =E2=80=9C0821=E2=80=9D refer to 11:21 UT and 13:21 UT on the 21st= ?

 

Hoping to extract Ward=E2=80=99s s= ignal and guessing that integrating from 01:30 UT (21st) to= 11:00 UT (21st) would be best. Does this sound right?=

 

73,

 

Jim AA5BW

 

From: hvanesce@comcast.net [mailto:hvan= esce@comcast.net]
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2018 10:44 = PM
To: 'rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org'
Subject: RE:= LF: K7PO testing 8270.0

 

Integrated 30 minutes of 8270 Hz d= ata from Georgia and Alaska receivers; based on Jay=E2=80=99s report 3= 0 minutes was much too short; guessing 8 hours or more would have been= more appropriate. Will try longer integration times tomorrow.

 

Any recommendations on a stacking = method?

 

Also processing 0130 Feb 21 UT and= later data from a Florida receiver.

 

How long will steady carrier conti= nue? Ward mentioned a second day of transmission, but if that is not a= full second day, or if steady carrier changes to EbNaut, knowing Feb = 21/22 steady-carrier start-stop time would be helpful.

 

73,

 

Jim AA5BW     =  

 

From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group= @blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Ward K7PO
Sent: Wed= nesday, February 21, 2018 6:49 PM
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subje= ct: Re: LF: K7PO testing 8270.0

 

Jay,

Thanks for the report. After the shaky start a w= eek or so ago, things seem to be working OK now. Fun stuff!

I'm= already set up for EbNaut tx, but will probably test with a carrier j= ust a little longer.

Ward

 

 

 

-----Ori= ginal Message-----
From: jrusgrove <jrusgrove@comcast.net>
To: rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep= =2Eorg>
Sent: Wed, Feb 21, 2018 4:19 pm
Subject: LF: K7PO= testing 8270.0

Ward

 

It appears that your carrier was easil= y received in CT last night. Using the same file as Stefan's transmiss= ion your carrier (*) was detected immediately at the 0,0,0,0 phase tri= al ... and improved as the decoding process continued. Carrier S/= N peaked 13.36 dB in 35.2 uHz. I'll check other files, including dayti= me files, later tonight.

 

Thanks very much for the Dreamers= Band carrier! Looking forward to an actual message.

 

Jay W1VD  WD2XNS  WE2XGR/2

 

 

 

----- Original Message -----=

From: Ward K7= PO <wmwheaton@= aim.com>

Sent: 2/21/20= 18 3:17:10 PM

Subject: Re: = LF: K7PO testing 8270.0

Paul,

Thanks for the report! You made my day. I'll le= ave it
on for another 24 hours, at least.

Ward  K7PO/WH= 2XXP

 

 

 

-----Ori= ginal Message-----
From: Paul Nicholson <vlf0403@abelian.org>
To: rsgb_lf_group <<= A href=3D"mailto:rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org">rsgb_lf_group@blackshee= p.org>
Sent: Wed, Feb 21, 2018 11:27 am
Subject: Re: LF: = K7PO testing 8270.0


> Testing now from ~0100Z until ?? 8= 270.0 800 ma

A terrific signal at Forest, VA, 3070km. Day and n= ight. A sharp
line exactly on frequency. Will post some plots later= or tomorrow.

So far, no detection at Todmorden... hopefully th= e carrier continues.

--
Paul Nicholson
--

<= /HTML> --KsclJJwyDfDJBYANSK2LHPvmGM=_57NUfe--