Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w14B2tl6010215 for ; Sun, 4 Feb 2018 12:02:58 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1eiI0N-0004Gz-VV for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 10:58:39 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1eiI0N-0004Go-L2 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 10:58:39 +0000 Received: from rhcavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be ([2a02:2c40:0:c0::25:130]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eiI0J-0002gq-Uk for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 10:58:38 +0000 X-KULeuven-Envelope-From: rik.strobbe@kuleuven.be X-KULeuven-Scanned: Found to be clean X-KULeuven-ID: A9468120327.A7816 X-KULeuven-Information: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Received: from icts-p-smtps-2.cc.kuleuven.be (icts-p-smtps-2e.kulnet.kuleuven.be [134.58.240.34]) by rhcavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9468120327 for ; Sun, 4 Feb 2018 11:58:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from ICTS-S-EXMBX7.luna.kuleuven.be (icts-s-exmbx7.luna.kuleuven.be [10.112.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by icts-p-smtps-2.cc.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6B192003B for ; Sun, 4 Feb 2018 11:58:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from ICTS-S-EXMBX26.luna.kuleuven.be (10.112.11.61) by ICTS-S-EXMBX7.luna.kuleuven.be (10.112.11.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Sun, 4 Feb 2018 11:58:31 +0100 Received: from ICTS-S-EXMBX27.luna.kuleuven.be (10.112.11.62) by ICTS-S-EXMBX26.luna.kuleuven.be (10.112.11.61) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Sun, 4 Feb 2018 11:58:31 +0100 Received: from ICTS-S-EXMBX27.luna.kuleuven.be ([fe80::291a:cc4f:6953:698a]) by ICTS-S-EXMBX27.luna.kuleuven.be ([fe80::291a:cc4f:6953:698a%25]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Sun, 4 Feb 2018 11:58:31 +0100 X-Kuleuven: This mail passed the K.U.Leuven mailcluster From: Rik Strobbe To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Thread-Topic: LF: MF/630M Thread-Index: AQHTnaDDEuVYPiBBDka0VFL1/xtmr6OT/wyAgAAS0jw= Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2018 10:58:31 +0000 Message-ID: <1517741903408.732@kuleuven.be> References: ,<9d58deff-f2c8-d84c-6342-6d5e7c10bda5@n1bug.com> In-Reply-To: <9d58deff-f2c8-d84c-6342-6d5e7c10bda5@n1bug.com> Accept-Language: nl-BE, en-GB, en-US Content-Language: nl-BE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.112.50.1] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 1.6 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Paul, "I am looking for information on QSO operating procedures for QRSS. I have only seen it used for beaconing." See http://www.472khz.org/pages/technical-topics/weak-signal-modes/extreme-narrow-bandwidth-modes.php (scroll down to "operating practice"). [...] Content analysis details: (1.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.6 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject is all capitals -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 3f8d74a8c70dd416d0a3a1dbcb9bb89f Subject: Re: LF: MF/630M Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by klubnl.pl id w14B2tl6010215 Hello Paul, "I am looking for information on QSO operating procedures for QRSS. I have only seen it used for beaconing." See http://www.472khz.org/pages/technical-topics/weak-signal-modes/extreme-narrow-bandwidth-modes.php (scroll down to "operating practice"). Maybe we should organize a transatlantic QSO party? JT9 and QRSS maybe the best modes for most of us, the "big guns" can try FT8 or plain CW. 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T ________________________________________ Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org namens N1BUG Verzonden: zondag 4 februari 2018 11:47 Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Onderwerp: Re: LF: MF/630M Just think how many trans-Atlantic QSOs could be made. Some, like myself are very interested but the primary problem is no one awake on the east side of the pond at the right times! I have seen signals strong enough for normal CW only a few times. JT9 would be easy and requires only about 3 dB more signal to decode than WSPR2. I am looking for information on QSO operating procedures for QRSS. I have only seen it used for beaconing. I've been off MF for a while as I put up a temporary HF antenna to work the Bouvet DXpedition and it severely messed up tuning of the MF antenna. Now that the Bouvet trip has been aborted I will be taking that antenna down and returning to MF as soon as I get a reasonable weather window. I will likely be on MF for a week or so before moving to LF. 73, Paul N1BUG On 02/04/2018 05:05 AM, mal hamilton wrote: > Last nite results good but not unusual, had reports from > > AA1A, KA1R, VE1YY > > Transatlantic contacts seem a regular occurrence at present on MF > between the UK and N.America > > Most operators are using WSPR but more CW both normal and QRSS would > be welcome like it used to be some years ago, ie real QSO mode > > 73 de mal/g3kev/io94sh