Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w15HmPHo015573 for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 18:48:26 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1eikma-0000PM-Oi for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2018 17:42:20 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1eikmZ-0000PD-Tf for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2018 17:42:19 +0000 Received: from mail-wr0-x22f.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22f]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eikmX-0001QS-4f for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2018 17:42:18 +0000 Received: by mail-wr0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id b52so10195386wrd.10 for ; Mon, 05 Feb 2018 09:42:16 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:message-id:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VYbaDJ5dET4FiuflRqwffJL3asnmgnetfWUQxJtu/Y0=; b=ov7fTyOue0nyk5dMzXN/N8Qr+zM0Uq4iCaXgQ7c9g/qRdn1KUPAKBBv8w8VwcDLkpg pvDtMlflgjk+l14aeOsTmegplTlWyn5v0uGJ/WBK/MnZXLWjrB+mL+AK1mN3KeT020AY S20+floANH7YaaJXQQELDFiBWYq3BzYErZCQwRtFMClFf6YxM+gtHlbfVHhNg1eWqrO/ sYTmQiBigfq11+bsBEgdEXH9RJ/Z5slhTuojWoSFWerjlnlDbFyfok9dG24KV39J85uO S/9nXPNgx0b5R9g9IEx0c4Woh+mF6f+Hk8cHsov6sC2TZEKcIsiv/sNsZ2y4fIaDSk1d XXoA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:message-id:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VYbaDJ5dET4FiuflRqwffJL3asnmgnetfWUQxJtu/Y0=; b=Oxiie1BtEKgcEHIysAWdpCy7A8VNfW9O0Ea91cTGBD5bYdwO5oy6eJajft0WyUsSZ4 K5VNCvIYshCqsZrJBoJc1i4tI5Qztpg1zIK5nXf1VXZVPn0nRBhdBAVTnvEhFqdmAUh0 mI73icVCPeiuxgEXnKxS85s0slhDZkkRgJT+gYyX73Bih8SGOO6EcNzL67wVzYqdz/pB SR6Nv5A0ZUGEdO4BGrhYs3ITAmzoHYa9evu/Z0ZOELPWmGRO9K1zKtklHpV0qCptTe7r 8iYoDLevQrU3I+Cw9IbQdA37jWjqu5eOrRErL6poaBFUUiibFx/v5JBc88CNewPxWs5L 3Scw== X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxyte5lfbqBJxko3fIF7FqRhmrCjfC05TZxLA9Y7XDK8qANmhi/gj0 j1m220mRvMgIJQzER5An/Vhlbg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x224kLZpFnNww2MR423SAfkvQL29U6Gj4TqRRgbTr+xVTF04Gy+D2qWwB2+mzTsPrU5Q5E0lFfw== X-Received: by 10.223.187.10 with SMTP id r10mr17957578wrg.177.1517852536135; Mon, 05 Feb 2018 09:42:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from OfficeWin7.lan (82-70-254-222.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk. [82.70.254.222]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n24sm9696148wmi.21.2018.02.05.09.42.14 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 05 Feb 2018 09:42:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 17:42:13 +0000 From: Chris Wilson X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1178094692.20180205174213@gmail.com> To: N1BUG CC: dead.fets@gmail.com In-Reply-To: References: <473da6a1-0b7d-1af6-5d0c-355b1c7bfe81@n1bug.com> <1E6A4083-58B4-455A-BEA5-64084858FF69@talktalk.net> <1517845014772.54341@kuleuven.be> <809882652.20180205161611@gmail.com> <1517848469797.2746@kuleuven.be> <797250428.20180205164428@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 1.6 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Paul, great explanation, I understand now, these little black box "toys" have their limitations :) Thank you, sorry to doubt you Rik! Monday, February 5, 2018, 4:57:02 PM, you wrote: > On 02/05/2018 11:44 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: >> >> Hello Rik, >> >> Thanks, but hmmm, when I TX in JT-9 on LF N1BUG doesn't have spots >> uploaded to PSK reporter site, although he receives me well. I asked >> on the WSJT group and they said it wouldn't as no proper QSO was >> completed. [...] Content analysis details: (1.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dead.fets[at]gmail.com) 1.6 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject is all capitals 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 046f068074e745d5c60ca47deee9b503 Subject: Re: LF: MF/630M BAND Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hello Paul, great explanation, I understand now, these little black box "toys" have their limitations :) Thank you, sorry to doubt you Rik! Monday, February 5, 2018, 4:57:02 PM, you wrote: > On 02/05/2018 11:44 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: >> >> Hello Rik, >> >> Thanks, but hmmm, when I TX in JT-9 on LF N1BUG doesn't have spots >> uploaded to PSK reporter site, although he receives me well. I asked >> on the WSJT group and they said it wouldn't as no proper QSO was >> completed. > That is because the U3S cannot transmit a standard formatted CQ > message. They may appear standard but they are not, they are sent as > free text messages which WSJT-X does not recognize as a CQ, thus > refuses to upload to PSK Reporter. > Put another way, the WSJT-X software compresses CQ messages into a > special format which the U3S does not do. > Tonight we will all be using WSJT-X, thus our CQ messages should be > properly encoded for recognition and upload to PSK Reporter at the > receiving end. > 73, > Paul N1BUG FN55mf -- Best regards, Chris mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com