Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w1CEFYH4011547 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 15:15:36 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1elEpH-0005yD-J9 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 14:11:23 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1elEpH-0005y4-0Q for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 14:11:23 +0000 Received: from mail-wr0-x22e.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22e]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1elEpC-0006yv-Q4 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 14:11:21 +0000 Received: by mail-wr0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id k9so1540104wre.9 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 06:11:18 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:message-id:to:cc:subject:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=OiE3ZS8SvGvQBunA02HgZ7LmhARRSfv2KEcEJuzYKYE=; b=rcfkYL2ObIEXcJTYVXofr+Ui36IRZPpIu67EfdoC6JkvSE+fuaGEz3TUfP5WGfcQ0n QMRt+rTSMq+kTtDn2g/9a5wCiyw6NHf50KHeO7o0PEIu5cAt54JpUAhY5+Qvr89Op4CP mXEYY7m4gNskxky82hVFYVEfCHLMwJ2i17I0gboBmIj70KPG069J9wjaYJz80VuywqQA CyO2WoqR86amhoTwdq4eSBFcypSID1OVw0+hudEfsbQh8YdWMhxbULvYO2jdhXSzhNI3 qETGqBeLWw8mU7Dk6UzgP56+bicGV+ITC/tetanL+anXT0CdrR68/N9Ydy1WMPhg2LPy CoXQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:message-id:to:cc:subject:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=OiE3ZS8SvGvQBunA02HgZ7LmhARRSfv2KEcEJuzYKYE=; b=fMVaNP0nSn8KmkPhsCP7RY5ViMYUvnUnfBXfQhG4JyYso7Nd1ZPanZSE1OP66B8Hgj KacTGalYfxdJkVpjXwJpB9jQ/kdTP7sSj9v3kq99B2QM7LCwQMsWEYBjlWWDJXDjyMLi PbhS9gXLf5TcT6LKSCagfEwMMB2SFkDpigulVCMYAshABTWFBjvpG0NvJCQ52Yy4pD5y GYDhW7b5+Ns6e2KIt8DilpxzghN8REpMk0RRAHkGd274/YjIe+i16at2HJcq77aHNQU5 okmhEb6bGnSQas6zXxU2fzhjGCyzWTod2sW+IugVgW74aYVygRXy20umGi1eNhm8fnRJ UxDg== X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPCQSPZdYNHEfQNHUzRdJ4jObcFYVf0qKT6kiYd+Dwr9gVJnRFxo XcuUh488/9xYw2yu5Gbax1pPfA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x227IVfY2/5okohAdO0rYbf0BEb2qyxtZmZ8Df1tvCQ+dt+tbSzMBnfaWdaHUEZyZuST7z8vgvw== X-Received: by 10.223.164.148 with SMTP id g20mr10350249wrb.49.1518444677513; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 06:11:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from OfficeWin7.lan (82-70-254-222.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk. [82.70.254.222]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z11sm7954595wrh.60.2018.02.12.06.11.16 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 12 Feb 2018 06:11:16 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 14:11:15 +0000 From: Chris Wilson X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1125097296.20180212141115@gmail.com> To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" CC: dead.fets@gmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello LF'ers, I would like to know if the experts here think I need an antenna attenuator on 136kHz? I am using in this capture a little IDC receiver: http://icas.to/lineup/idc-136-kit-eng.htm [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dead.fets[at]gmail.com) 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: e90dcb17768c7e768f13e0721cc1c0c7 Subject: LF: Do I need an attenuator on LF RX?? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME, TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hello LF'ers, I would like to know if the experts here think I need an antenna attenuator on 136kHz? I am using in this capture a little IDC receiver: http://icas.to/lineup/idc-136-kit-eng.htm but see the same with a Softrock LF. I am unsure if the antenna is overloading the RX, it's a big file at around 14 megs, but I guess most people, unlike me in the sticks, have broadband :) Thanks. http://www.gatesgarth.com/Untitled26.mp4 -- Best regards, Chris mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com