Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w0QGqv3p008732 for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 17:52:58 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1ef7B7-0004YG-Ln for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 16:48:37 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1ef7B7-0004Y7-69 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 16:48:37 +0000 Received: from mout.perfora.net ([74.208.4.196]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ef7B2-0007z4-Th for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 16:48:35 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.127] ([72.224.254.201]) by mrelay.perfora.net (mreueus001 [74.208.5.2]) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0Ludss-1eo15p34We-00zoOB for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 17:48:29 +0100 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <1371247928.20180126134524@gmail.com> <1397698645.2553258.1516983835152.JavaMail.open-xchange@oxbe7.tb.ukmail.iss.as9143.net> From: N1BUG Message-ID: Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 11:48:28 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1397698645.2553258.1516983835152.JavaMail.open-xchange@oxbe7.tb.ukmail.iss.as9143.net> Content-Language: en-US X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:1+HiKunW9myDH8/dQgSzF8ZS10rA3glsL56dp4yhT4TYiJmTu6d N+MX71SaJPmCykOhpC1BtgF525yEG8X71RTyYRuP36jxUukqMXShrA5q4PbLexGZ+HVHtda gZsV0faLwrOqKRBcOB+iOLR5Gz9rpYn9Wbs32IRHJ/mzVv5SOfAHEa8xPcmgRcFu5LAOlcK ROH4r519OvSU4tBoN+U6Q== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:tqY8ZuQKMyk=:ukfsmi/VWfGqnbbkX50LiW bihOiGR6AKrZcKxFjIl2/6xeTjXc141ytr806RheJAyUAG0S9pU19dlkXcs556WFUx8GeIvcQ s6fncbTrW5cigjVha84KZj+w6DCp2h6FN2qZg4IxEb4g3RMfGKbCij6Nj7NOAa5rMvh/CoABw 8xFZ2uHNMSPyAJyNtDSEKrohIo0FWHgXXeY+4B5vYPyM52OOD3/sb87PnJ3jWyWYLiOCs+C0d PED8+26zGjO0a7yg+cvQhKeMYTHBe2co2wAmP5jSzINdyeu4nJ+BPgp3K30LB9Sqe6XZkmhQ5 tkGFdihQLBNSopWK6BMa18pZ7fqICu7c+So+E9YAxXTYAhc4Znx5N6uFb0OPS6f5vOinrcbhG Kngp4yKlLh4IcEP9yVwuB4868wZm9xFCMjzyd1nTml7yxCNjWwLtDsFbhyFndvP5GlFi5VlYq 7bcUmVJECoG6zxEDw3PKMtEr39wx5mFaW3/yLaHT8d0+sZ2+PbY/7nw9j7ff9Q/oQtSR2U3/t EjwN9lBy/MTVs7tOr6xP2Ll3d2vIzHjq8Ti2IEYwpw+q9p1sx8+zOT1galsmnewAXNfsCkewT aqdnaQqxvxKEEojd3Iuiv7hkuinuugqTWt0UMR0WWBlaj9h9WqxFcJzJ+SPUnMslYSQ0IwjiP mp59q+djH5gRB1cbgGaH+DefFrqjvgZ0wa+w6DPQLS7ROaXYHmzMe60WX56QlvzReU2MWg/3C 6Ye0IQv/DjtiauYD X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: I replied to Chris elsewhere on this and I agree about the oscillator being fishy. When it was working his numbers seemed right... 115.364 LO * 4 = oscillator at 461.456, seems right for a 461.5 kHz crystal. All of mine have oscillated just a bit below the crystal frequency. (In the LF version my 455 kHz crystal oscillates at 454.916. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Scan-Signature: e4d79cc1e5beb0f7c63f6aa3ce129e10 Subject: Re: LF: Softrock RX divider IC problem, unexpected frequency out Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false I replied to Chris elsewhere on this and I agree about the oscillator being fishy. When it was working his numbers seemed right... 115.364 LO * 4 = oscillator at 461.456, seems right for a 461.5 kHz crystal. All of mine have oscillated just a bit below the crystal frequency. (In the LF version my 455 kHz crystal oscillates at 454.916. He now says he's measuring 464.444 at the input to the dividers, that seems wrong! I suspect the oscillator has gone free-running or has spurious output(s). It could be his crystal isn't happy with the capacitor values I used. They worked for me but I used a different crystal. It may also be that resistor which I changed from 22k to 10k. At 22k my oscillator was not running correctly. 10k fixed it here but it may still be too close to the edge, he might try going a bit lower with that resistor. Paul On 01/26/2018 11:23 AM, DAVE PICK wrote: > Chris > > You seem to have made a divide by three rather than four... > > I'm not sure what's causing that but make sure any unused inputs are > tied up or down as appropriate. > > You have measured the frequency of the oscillator but is it a good > square-wave on 464? > > Something isn't quite right with the oscillator if its 3kHz off.. > > If it's a bit wobbly it may be mis-triggering. A capacitor change > may be needed around the oscillator part in order to keep the > low-frequency crystal happy. > > Dave > >> On 26 January 2018 at 13:45 Chris Wilson wrote: >> >> >> >> >> Hello LF and VLF folk! >> >> I have built a couple of Softrock Lite II IF frequency receivers, >> normally they would be used to view another receiver's IF on a >> bandscope, but popularly they are also used on low and medium >> frequencies as stand alone SDR receivers. The MF one works fine. Th LF >> one was intermittent, then failed with high current draw. I isolated >> it to a faulty or shorted divider chip. The original one was marked >> 78C49NM. I couldn't find one of those, so plumped for one from RS >> Components here in the UK, a CD74AC74M96G4, RS part number 662-6939 >> The oscillator worked on the bench and from an xtal frequency of 461.5 >> kHz gave the expected divide by 4 output of 115.364 or very close. >> Then suddenly it started receiving broadcast stations and the divided >> outputs Q and /Q were on 153.814 KHz! There they remain. Fiddling I >> briefly saw a return to 115.36 Khz, but it was not for long. All >> voltages to it's pins are correct at 5V. I am not sure if it's a >> faulty divider, or a bad connection or short. >> >> Xtal case is grounded and seems stable. R16 in the oscillator changed >> on advice from 22.1k to 10k as they apparently tend to stop running >> with 21.1k there. I attach the schematic. Wrong IC? Details of the >> divider's operation are at >> http://www.wb5rvz.org/softrock_lite_ii/03_div >> >> The new IC details are at >> https://uk.rs-online.com/web/p/flip-flop-ics/6626939/ >> >> I see these frequencies on these pins: >> >> Pin 3 : 464.444 kHz >> >> Pin 11 : 464.444 >> >> Pin 12 : 153.814 >> >> Pin 8 : 153.814 >> >> Pin 2 : 307.625 >> >> Pin 2 : 307.625 >> >> Is this a random IC fault or does it have some mathematical >> correlation? My maths is pitiful! >> >> Not sure what to do now, I have another IC but before risking pad >> damage thought it prudent to ask, many thanks. >> >> Pins 14 and 2 on the mixer IC show good, 90 degree out of phase square >> waveforms of normal amplitude on a scope, but at 153.814 KHz.... >> >> Schematic is at http://www.gatesgarth.com/schematic.jpg >> >> >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Chris mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com