Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w0EG507R013585 for ; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 17:05:02 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1eakgu-0005O7-Nr for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 15:59:24 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1eakgu-0005Ny-5v for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 15:59:24 +0000 Received: from smtp-out01.xworks.net ([31.25.48.13]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eakgr-0007z8-AD for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 15:59:22 +0000 Received: from mailbackend2-1 (cluster06.xworks.net [10.100.1.80]) by smtp-out01.xworks.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2212160C6B for ; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 16:59:19 +0100 (CET) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=kabelmail.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kabelmail.de; s=mail; t=1515945559; bh=8zvHRXgET7u6XPHCuj5DImFrKUPJqRv3lg4jabUcrNo=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To: Content-Type; b=IzaT99Z86MDsupKWWjUaMpSiKCMyq+R5gySWBj7R5pJUZMNucy/HEQYTDFYi8LHUG +vMhr56zEb5bgftHqgu2rQ1IIjYg3N8TEV2vcXJp//vox9pP0UvkUtkp9Y0kvNHAWj 9KEonQamyHACoEoDAu9XRvWa9hFkePkXEvfSoZ8k= Received: from [192.168.36.33] (ipbcc12910.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de [188.193.41.16]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.kabelmail.de with ESMTP id w0EFxF4p029783 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 16:59:16 +0100 X-mediaBEAM-Originating-IP: [188.193.41.16] X-mediaBEAM-AUTHID: [DK1IS@kabelmail.de] To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <7526294B3FDF4BB09986E9AA559058B7@PCPMF> From: DK1IS Message-ID: Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 17:00:20 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-mediaBEAM-AuthCheck: route13 X-mediaBEAM-AuthScore: 0.0/5.0, scanned in 1.200sec X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Andy and Hans, thanks for the report, Andy! Hans, I also think that there were some problems with your antenna. At 20180113 your signal in JN 59WK never exceeded 549 and I had to use my remote RX to get you at all; in our QSO you gave me 449. At our former contacts the reports were 20131213: 579 fm DK1IS / 559 fm DK8ND, 20140322: 569 / 579, time of the year and UTC having been not so different. Seeing the powerlevels and the antennas in use I had expected at least similar good values like 2013/2014. Do you use the Marconi for reception too? As Andy already said you obviously weren´t able to hear a lot of stations calling you. Anyway, nice to meet you again and thanks for the QSO! [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: bc223f74149f392a7d9f3881f05f1e70 Subject: Re: LF: DK8ND cqing 472k CW on 13.01.2018 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------BBE0748411DC0BC23497ED9A" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------BBE0748411DC0BC23497ED9A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by smtp.kabelmail.de id w0EFxF4p029783 Hello Andy and Hans, thanks for the report, Andy! Hans, I also think that there were some=20 problems with your antenna. At 20180113 your signal in JN 59WK never=20 exceeded 549 and I had to use my remote RX to get you at all; in our QSO=20 you gave me 449. At our former contacts the reports were 20131213: 579=20 fm DK1IS / 559 fm DK8ND, 20140322: 569 / 579, time of the year and UTC=20 having been not so different. Seeing the powerlevels and the antennas in=20 use I had expected at least similar good values like 2013/2014. Do you=20 use the Marconi for reception too? As Andy already said you obviously=20 weren=C2=B4t able to hear a lot of stations calling you. Anyway, nice to meet you again and thanks for the QSO! Gl es cuagn, 73 de Tom, DK1IS Am 13.01.2018 um 19:58 schrieb F6CNI - Andy - JN19QB: > An other info dear Hans. I listen your QSO with Tom DK1IS beginning at=20 > 1846 TU. I think you have some antenna problem. Here Tom signal was=20 > 599 +, about 12 db better than your signal. I heard again other=20 > stations calling you but you did not copy their signals. > Now here I QRT. Best 73 to all. > *From:* F6CNI - Andy - JN19QB > *Sent:* Saturday, January 13, 2018 7:42 PM > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > *Subject:* LF: DK8ND cqing 472k CW on 13.01.2018 > Hello Hans. > I just heard your CQ begining at 1832 TU on 472.270. Here your report=20 > in JN19QB is 589 good copy. 6 > stations are now answering your CQ. > Sorry I cannot transmit, my TX antenna is not OK here. > Good luck. > 73 de Andy. --------------BBE0748411DC0BC23497ED9A Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by smtp.kabelmail.de id w0EFxF4p029783
Hello Andy and Hans,

thanks for the report, Andy! Hans, I also think that there were some problems with your antenna. At 20180113 your signal in JN 59WK never exceeded 549 and I had to use my remote RX to get you at all; in our QSO you gave me 449. At our former contacts the reports were 20131213: 579 fm DK1IS / 559 fm DK8ND, 20140322: 569 / 579, time of the year and UTC having been not so different. Seeing the powerlevels and the antennas in use I had expected at least similar good values like 2013/2014. Do you use the Marconi for reception too? As Andy already said you obviously weren=C2=B4t = able to hear a lot of stations calling you.
Anyway, nice to meet you again and thanks for the QSO!

Gl es cuagn, 73 de
Tom, DK1IS

Am 13.01.2018 um 19:58 schrieb F6CNI - Andy - JN19QB:
=C2=A0
An other info dear Hans. I listen your QSO with Tom DK1IS beginning at 1846 TU. I think you have some antenna problem. Here Tom signal was 599 +, about 12 db better than your signal. I heard again other stations calling you but you did not copy their signals.
=C2=A0
Now here I QRT. Best 73 to all.
Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2018 7:42 PM
Subject: LF: DK8ND cqing 472k CW on 13.01.2018
=C2=A0
=C2=A0
Hello Hans.
=C2=A0
I just heard your CQ begining at 1832 TU on 472.270. Here your report in JN19QB is 589 good copy. 6
stations ar= e now answering your CQ.
=C2=A0
Sorry I can= not transmit, my TX antenna is not OK here.
=C2=A0
Good luck.
=C2=A0
73 de Andy.

--------------BBE0748411DC0BC23497ED9A--