Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w0QKGQ8D009300 for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 21:16:27 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1efAM1-0005th-2E for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 20:12:05 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1efAM0-0005tY-NO for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 20:12:04 +0000 Received: from mail-pf0-x22b.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22b]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1efALw-0000RN-VT for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 20:12:03 +0000 Received: by mail-pf0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id e76so980358pfk.1 for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 12:12:00 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=+/efzbvoirr4+4mCdctVkuqWNokVfvdR+P1FXPxtlm8=; b=HCZjA1gqevoW8wQDA2eJ3xD1x0FzfTaKJXWDUUs+VyAxyXDIdYJ7hncVCPrE4pQ8ad LPqSwsS++GwIFXnIQt9vGGlgKvo1y+PLyGjZInDsUWrdMhfvMqTMXr3HwTyU09z2nxw1 UfMIXnppgBUf1XqQIalojKLa1kYbpOoxhd7CmDQiR/xsd7ZJmcNIIqubtldIEkAMNkGE VjQaxSRQOLZbOHIxUr3I7JyMIwe0FvUfFUEpddkFXDIkaEZyfhNcny9RlFlJm8AFXs2o 4H4mPEX9Yg5ayts/1mYjCUKs3bFvuTrIXAElmYv9jDRjs3FXpfOf1rFqu73AQjxe9r9n F0Hw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=+/efzbvoirr4+4mCdctVkuqWNokVfvdR+P1FXPxtlm8=; b=JlnayLyLprMI0kdE3mFeZ3mvG3rMY12rsgfTcT6PlW75cJ72RX4/OKM3w7GcX0JysG 5jZKaa6sTIJWEwxVLgB2rWNEcpxoSB5ibiFqIHaEqYaAY0v+tw2vd48SicdrU51SFwVJ 5/JOD0ter4lrSWlGDSxY8EsfTqpQKuSnJPcnJTKgIzzvada/2NKgbPkDPhxIS1Oj6h2R JaBGcKBuwi4fqsVhVAnXVJzt6WaANIr99jZcIXZ9+UvWYHUu+n8pkF1fwMACU6+8df9n G3UUa5mSzgpu+l5kQNwehDTYIKMxcawS+rGhM3kKiKwks0gi7AhtsumHlU5+Q4x1vMiG OL1A== X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytdz256+PISlKlICZPLZHvBreMFwAKAIaskJ8ITlExsyCUP6KzWy 2XlF0JXfTBMpAYI8CsZBx4/5ldcPOxC3SazGrEE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x226jYYNIagDjMJlo5jT0z5tfMciGektGzDwDw1fwINkG8D40h5ulttQgCvq5+tnqjwh2J3/oiRoDszn/5whYysI= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:5497:: with SMTP id e23-v6mr15032920pli.194.1516997518426; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 12:11:58 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.170.68 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 12:11:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <686847880.20180126193617@gmail.com> References: <1371247928.20180126134524@gmail.com> <1397698645.2553258.1516983835152.JavaMail.open-xchange@oxbe7.tb.ukmail.iss.as9143.net> <686847880.20180126193617@gmail.com> From: M0FMT Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 20:11:58 +0000 Message-ID: To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi all The important thing is that the frequency is correct (which it is) the wave form looks OK and the peak to peak volts are enough to drive the flip/flop There is a bit of second order distortion on the MF LO but it is not an issue. [...] Content analysis details: (1.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (peteg8fmt[at]gmail.com) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 1.0 FREEMAIL_REPLY From and body contain different freemails X-Scan-Signature: 47a967f57bae6380aac0a0062beb1b4e Subject: Re: LF: Softrock RX divider IC problem, unexpected frequency out Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003606330563b382fb" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false --0000000000003606330563b382fb Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi all The important thing is that the frequency is correct (which it is) the wave form looks OK and the peak to peak volts are enough to drive the flip/flop There is a bit of second order distortion on the MF LO but it is not an issue. I personally would conclude the problem is with the flip flop however try doing the same at the divide by four LO output check you have two outputs and if you can compare the phase difference it should be a 1/4 cycle difference i.e. 90 degree shifted. The level should be similar to the levels already seen on the first oscillographs. but it can be lower and still work OK i.e. over the threshold to trigger the multiplex chip normal TTL levels tolerance. Good luck 73 petefmt On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 7:36 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > > I just completed two scope measurements at R17 to pin 3 of the divider > IC. One of the faulty LF Softrock, and one on my MF one that works > fine. the resultant wave forms are quite different. But I am not > clever enough to say if they hold the clue, so will post them here. > Thanks again. > > Faulty LF oscillator or divider first > > http://www.gatesgarth.com/R17-to-pin3.jpg > > > Working MF Softrock, same place > > http://www.gatesgarth.com/mf-R17-to-pin3.jpg > > > > -- > Best regards, > Chris mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com > > > --0000000000003606330563b382fb Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi all

The important thing i= s that the frequency is correct (which it is)=C2=A0the wave form looks OK a= nd the peak to peak volts are enough to drive the flip/flop There is a bit = of second order distortion on the MF LO but it is not an issue.
<= br>
I personally would conclude the problem is with the flip flop= however try doing the same at the divide by four=C2=A0LO output check you = have two outputs and if you can compare the phase difference it should be a= 1/4 cycle difference i.e. 90 degree shifted. The level should be similar t= o the levels already seen on the first oscillographs. but it can be lower a= nd still work OK i.e. over the threshold to trigger the=C2=A0multiplex chip= normal=C2=A0TTL levels tolerance.

Good luck 73 pe= tefmt=C2=A0



On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 7:36 PM, Chris = Wilson <dead.fets@gmail.com> wrote:



=C2=A0I just completed two scope measurements at R17 to pin 3 of the divide= r
=C2=A0IC. One of the faulty LF Softrock, and one on my MF one that works =C2=A0fine. the resultant wave forms are quite different. But I am not
=C2=A0clever enough to say if they hold the clue, so will post them here. =C2=A0Thanks again.

Faulty LF oscillator or divider first

http://www.gatesgarth.com/R17-to-pin3.jpg


Working MF Softrock, same place

http://www.gatesgarth.com/mf-R17-to-pin3.jpg



--
Best regards,
=C2=A0Chris=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com



--0000000000003606330563b382fb--