Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w07Hc0xq018864 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2018 18:38:01 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1eYEpq-00029R-T7 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 07 Jan 2018 17:34:14 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1eYEpq-00029I-IW for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 07 Jan 2018 17:34:14 +0000 Received: from mail-wm0-x22f.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::22f]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eYEpn-0007HJ-8M for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 07 Jan 2018 17:34:13 +0000 Received: by mail-wm0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id b141so10406728wme.1 for ; Sun, 07 Jan 2018 09:34:11 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=OuyhMkyXtYiB8KkMjW2wZe68jBF+C5kwiHAkJmZDaLg=; b=g7968/AQBcBfc3xrEUAzq3emm4c2PCg5CyZYRh18lV5sBilsmty5yD7ySYb6JGKtSq 9s+KL0QW3KkV6IKU4SbRTNRTcZcFQoEv9+FJD8/1jEuUINAfF/YZbFeobmIVRod2W+NQ ugvz3/2g8D8nNFTqn5XGRt4Y7ha1V/+UZewjGiq3vRgVG4XUNSMezudTrYFnTp1eYBJw gjo7twb4MDx5KHamvfQuErnYzasHFAgdMUXgk+g7MJwP5xioNTd3sE2HE9GZT2DDImtY xIlTlbcvBZ3VYqzuvkD8NGy6BidUrnMV3pgK+a1fdH5fh9mC+08lgCMxE//6qhszYGK1 OTaA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=OuyhMkyXtYiB8KkMjW2wZe68jBF+C5kwiHAkJmZDaLg=; b=oJp72uckxhVYhqWwWjrywtGwow3jXVMNaabTnyUnp1Ir7BNxoh1GOrfsXc2Nxlbb8t PbocoB2PnrOQsEcpOsl5trhMfERgnRyf9a5dPueQWVzHosLr34xdfVHuVO0ZUFNAJRBs 1si6U1OdWgdbdeIz6sz9FqbkcisKB3Uq5ahFKcjZdRPi5/LLtpLviyRq1glJwyTk4uNX RkXLHnLZY8WlrUY6AWhQdSxavEp5dph+qjMwjlN+Sk+7qSEs3uVOcXEU1u7VluMntQB4 QoV+aue3oFbdOwztbI2VnRBVQ3cTrMPwCWB+Fx+Ve9VbOb1I1Au8UlirBSlvn35Twskg 6CcA== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mLiEssG0ZZcpPj1YoQwmKWoG+2DlaaDIZnPtRqtr8tzCRAbndZ8 8Vd+K3dmXrpllJdHfOB80pIgYI7lv6yZxB/4pY4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBotEw40bmbSUul+ZgKA42rpskP6RnPtRj/1So3953l0zsHbE1d4fx0UzxUZlkR+oPKrYuG3ucsPm+zhFILaHQyI= X-Received: by 10.80.177.178 with SMTP id m47mr13055414edd.261.1515346450108; Sun, 07 Jan 2018 09:34:10 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.80.177.54 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Jan 2018 09:34:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <923db48e-ca8e-67d5-e70d-3c9695277b97@n1bug.com> References: <923db48e-ca8e-67d5-e70d-3c9695277b97@n1bug.com> From: Andy Talbot Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2018 17:34:09 +0000 Message-ID: To: LineOne X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: What core ? What dimensions ? Does it obey the fundamental equation for saturation in a core ? Vrms = 4.44 .F . N . A . B F Hz, N turns, A core area area in m^2 B Tesla [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (andy.g4jnt[at]gmail.com) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 20fb97b64762a0bd80c12a4b2f6724b0 Subject: Re: LF: Progress? with the PA Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045c2cb4ded44805623316e5" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false --f403045c2cb4ded44805623316e5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" What core ? What dimensions ? Does it obey the fundamental equation for saturation in a core ? Vrms = 4.44 .F . N . A . B F Hz, N turns, A core area area in m^2 B Tesla Keep B < 0.1 and ferrite saturation should be fine And if it is saturating, you need more turns, not less Andy G4JNT On 7 January 2018 at 17:26, N1BUG wrote: > http://n1bug.com/n1debug/ASB_LF_Amp-20171223.jpg > > Recall that last week I had increased turns on the output transformer from > 3x5 to 3x10. That reduced heating of the FET but did not help to stabilize > the PA. It would put 12 to 14W into the antenna before oscillation started. > > Today I changed it to 4x10 turns so it is now a 16:1 transformer. This has > made a big change! The PA will now put more than 30 watts into the antenna > before oscillation starts with 13V on it. For the first time I noticed some > slight warming of the transformer. I think it is the core heating up, not > the wire. > > If I put 19V on it, I briefly see almost 50 watts into the antenna but the > transformer becomes hot very quickly and within just 3 or 4 seconds, power > begins to drop rapidly. > > At this point I guess either: > > The core is not suitable material or not big enough... > > or > > Maybe it needs fewer turns (but this may lead to too much heat in the FET > again?) At 30W output with 13V, that FET is already running quite warm with > 4x10 turns. > > At least I finally found something that makes a change! > > 73, > Paul N1BUG > > --f403045c2cb4ded44805623316e5 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
What core ?
What=C2=A0 dimensions ?

Does it obey the fundamental equation for saturation in a core ?
Vrms =3D 4.44 .F . N . A . B

F Hz,=C2=A0 = =C2=A0N turns,=C2=A0 A core area area in m^2=C2=A0 =C2=A0B Tesla
=
Keep B < 0.1 and=C2=A0 ferrite saturation should be fine<= /div>

And if it is saturating, you need more turns, not = less

Andy=C2=A0 G4JNT


On 7= January 2018 at 17:26, N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com> wrote:
http://n1bug.com/n1debug/AS= B_LF_Amp-20171223.jpg

Recall that last week I had increased turns on the output transformer from = 3x5 to 3x10. That reduced heating of the FET but did not help to stabilize = the PA. It would put 12 to 14W into the antenna before oscillation started.=

Today I changed it to 4x10 turns so it is now a 16:1 transformer. This has = made a big change! The PA will now put more than 30 watts into the antenna = before oscillation starts with 13V on it. For the first time I noticed some= slight warming of the transformer. I think it is the core heating up, not = the wire.

If I put 19V on it, I briefly see almost 50 watts into the antenna but the = transformer becomes hot very quickly and within just 3 or 4 seconds, power = begins to drop rapidly.

At this point I guess either:

The core is not suitable material or not big enough...

or

Maybe it needs fewer turns (but this may lead to too much heat in the FET a= gain?) At 30W output with 13V, that FET is already running quite warm with = 4x10 turns.

At least I finally found something that makes a change!

73,
Paul N1BUG


--f403045c2cb4ded44805623316e5--