Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w0QGjuZ4008725 for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 17:45:59 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1ef72d-0004Oz-Q3 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 16:39:51 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1ef72d-0004Oq-Ct for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 16:39:51 +0000 Received: from mail-wm0-x22f.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::22f]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ef72Z-0007vW-Ei for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 16:39:50 +0000 Received: by mail-wm0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id t74so2462615wme.3 for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 08:39:47 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=wzBoFR1akn2mtYWdlSvYT0TgyiLagLG//pEhNWgrUpM=; b=DjFLULOh91e13/k0qtgl2CZsJFcVk4NjdYpaoBeh0FDJpiU5/q+rDSoWEu/lyBKEE6 hyI9GvyAzI0Xh8j1byiaQ+B+jObRP8GgSwF5EECUH6/sSjxwOKmUOpMvWu+jcoN0ThHI cb+Gv88AKPrsKI1HHXeT8s6R1Z3NrmWfPVRuFVI0sn5tuAH44qDX8Mt3Y8rz9xYPapYq 0uIq2q6lMB2MrHUbS+Ai9KjkwmrNqm4EX2PLd06CGG7/NhX299UHLqg4+BetCXirSIcu CKjZg7vWdJ+HVQ/tofpWI6aYdQZia+LqGwrbNS79+uhULPzdKoPO7UdT5XprR4DlrNiz hSTg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=wzBoFR1akn2mtYWdlSvYT0TgyiLagLG//pEhNWgrUpM=; b=CyZSOuQPel3DWAjqYfODyFDIWnD//5JkC2akN2zeQ5jpAkCkQ2QFH6kgaNpncTrJ5q xhijl2t6vciYMrG1YRcqe/nua3uZP2Nk37z8W0fT3AYwbpECEAHA0qaH0ALbTeNNf1qw I8wK2Mx6YlMPSXFV2Nhob6L5Inozqzdab/2Eq/tnZuYLA3tTOhQSfbTgr1oggo7/mYUc rQddhL2yrSR1H9X47QRpBU2IRYaRxa7DYS9k11z2cHubbexeus2hQ04d3zmO1zGQ1Bhp oJKtlPeKab7/P+vDdWruHgxxwN4iszONOjN8qLMLp8P3KwxNYci3VpAla+yLvw+An+PE GVWw== X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytclG5RStBeW9YxgM4BiVESslAEsGIIEW3PKDhRp5I9+Dyb4WnlT 5nvFd3RLSqHK4Ah/aYDTJ5BHfgcYIjooHr327FQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x227Of+xqr+zVV3BkY5yro5vCHwpJUeMgSuG6AH3Inkc2LukNF/6pT2bWvZ+aRmgRadN/NMTASMjq4ykWksV/988= X-Received: by 10.80.137.164 with SMTP id g33mr34924636edg.261.1516984786419; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 08:39:46 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.80.179.198 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 08:39:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1397698645.2553258.1516983835152.JavaMail.open-xchange@oxbe7.tb.ukmail.iss.as9143.net> References: <1371247928.20180126134524@gmail.com> <1397698645.2553258.1516983835152.JavaMail.open-xchange@oxbe7.tb.ukmail.iss.as9143.net> From: Andy Talbot Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 16:39:45 +0000 Message-ID: To: LineOne X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: That is EXACTLY what happened in my case. The slow waveform hitting the linearly biassed gates generated instability at the crossover causing the divider to fail. I think I may even have seen divide by 3 at some point. [...] Content analysis details: (1.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (andy.g4jnt[at]gmail.com) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 1.0 FREEMAIL_REPLY From and body contain different freemails X-Scan-Signature: 617a5faed955112e448650f4d003a84d Subject: Re: LF: Softrock RX divider IC problem, unexpected frequency out Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045c22e253035e0563b08b85" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false --f403045c22e253035e0563b08b85 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" That is EXACTLY what happened in my case. The slow waveform hitting the linearly biassed gates generated instability at the crossover causing the divider to fail. I think I may even have seen divide by 3 at some point. It was very clear on a scope what was happening. The proper solution , for low frequencies, is to build a squarer circuit using comparators or Schmitt triggers. It's just not worth bodging things. Linearly biassed CMOS gates are not always the best way to go from sine to square Andy G4JNT On 26 January 2018 at 16:23, DAVE PICK wrote: > Chris > > You seem to have made a divide by three rather than four... > > I'm not sure what's causing that but make sure any unused inputs are tied > up or down as appropriate. > > You have measured the frequency of the oscillator but is it a good > square-wave on 464? > > Something isn't quite right with the oscillator if its 3kHz off.. > > If it's a bit wobbly it may be mis-triggering. A capacitor change may be > needed around the oscillator part in order to keep the low-frequency > crystal happy. > > Dave > > On 26 January 2018 at 13:45 Chris Wilson wrote: > > > > > Hello LF and VLF folk! > > I have built a couple of Softrock Lite II IF frequency receivers, > normally they would be used to view another receiver's IF on a > bandscope, but popularly they are also used on low and medium > frequencies as stand alone SDR receivers. The MF one works fine. Th LF > one was intermittent, then failed with high current draw. I isolated > it to a faulty or shorted divider chip. The original one was marked > 78C49NM. I couldn't find one of those, so plumped for one from RS > Components here in the UK, a CD74AC74M96G4, RS part number 662-6939 > The oscillator worked on the bench and from an xtal frequency of 461.5 > kHz gave the expected divide by 4 output of 115.364 or very close. > Then suddenly it started receiving broadcast stations and the divided > outputs Q and /Q were on 153.814 KHz! There they remain. Fiddling I > briefly saw a return to 115.36 Khz, but it was not for long. All > voltages to it's pins are correct at 5V. I am not sure if it's a > faulty divider, or a bad connection or short. > > Xtal case is grounded and seems stable. R16 in the oscillator changed > on advice from 22.1k to 10k as they apparently tend to stop running > with 21.1k there. I attach the schematic. Wrong IC? Details of the > divider's operation are at http://www.wb5rvz.org/softrock_lite_ii/03_div > > The new IC details are at https://uk.rs-online.com/web/ > p/flip-flop-ics/6626939/ > > I see these frequencies on these pins: > > Pin 3 : 464.444 kHz > > Pin 11 : 464.444 > > Pin 12 : 153.814 > > Pin 8 : 153.814 > > Pin 2 : 307.625 > > Pin 2 : 307.625 > > Is this a random IC fault or does it have some mathematical > correlation? My maths is pitiful! > > Not sure what to do now, I have another IC but before risking pad > damage thought it prudent to ask, many thanks. > > Pins 14 and 2 on the mixer IC show good, 90 degree out of phase square > waveforms of normal amplitude on a scope, but at 153.814 KHz.... > > Schematic is at http://www.gatesgarth.com/schematic.jpg > > > > -- > Best regards, > Chris mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com > > > > --f403045c22e253035e0563b08b85 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
That is EXACTLY what happened in my case.=C2=A0 The slow w= aveform hitting the linearly biassed gates generated instability at the cro= ssover causing the divider to fail.=C2=A0 =C2=A0I think I may even have see= n divide by 3 at some point.=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0
It was very clear on a = scope what was happening.

The proper solution , fo= r low frequencies, is to build a squarer circuit using comparators or Schmi= tt triggers.=C2=A0 =C2=A0It's just not worth bodging things.=C2=A0 Line= arly biassed CMOS gates are not always the best way to go from sine to squa= re

Andy=C2=A0 G4JNT

On 26 January 2018 at 16:23, DAVE PI= CK <daveyxm@virginmedia.com> wrote:
=20

Chris

You seem to have made a divide by three rather tha= n four...

I'm not sure what's causing that but make sure = any unused inputs are tied up or down as appropriate.

You have me= asured the frequency of the oscillator but is it a good square-wave on 464?=

Something isn't quite right with the oscillator if its 3kHz = off..

If it's a bit wobbly it may be mis-triggering. A capaci= tor change may be needed around the oscillator part in order to keep the lo= w-frequency crystal happy.

Dave

=

On 26 January 2018 at 13:45 Chris Wilson <dead.fets@gmail.com> wrote:



Hello LF and VLF folk!

I have built a couple of Softrock Li= te II IF frequency receivers,
normally they would be used to view anothe= r receiver's IF on a
bandscope, but popularly they are also used on = low and medium
frequencies as stand alone SDR receivers. The MF one work= s fine. Th LF
one was intermittent, then failed with high current draw. = I isolated
it to a faulty or shorted divider chip. The original one was = marked
78C49NM. I couldn't find one of those, so plumped for one fro= m RS
Components here in the UK, a CD74AC74M96G4, RS part number 662-6939=
The oscillator worked on the bench and from an xtal frequency of 461.5<= br>kHz gave the expected divide by 4 output of 115.364 or very close.
Th= en suddenly it started receiving broadcast stations and the divided
outp= uts Q and /Q were on 153.814 KHz! There they remain. Fiddling I
briefly = saw a return to 115.36 Khz, but it was not for long. All
voltages to it&= #39;s pins are correct at 5V. I am not sure if it's a
faulty divider= , or a bad connection or short.

Xtal case is grounded and seems stab= le. R16 in the oscillator changed
on advice from 22.1k to 10k as they ap= parently tend to stop running
with 21.1k there. I attach the schematic. = Wrong IC? Details of the
divider's operation are at http://www.wb5r= vz.org/softrock_lite_ii/03_div

The new IC details are at https://uk.rs-online.com/web/p/flip-flop-ics/6626939/
I see these frequencies on these pins:

Pin 3 : 464.444 kHz

= Pin 11 : 464.444

Pin 12 : 153.814

Pin 8 : 153.814

Pin = 2 : 307.625

Pin 2 : 307.625

Is this a random IC fault or does= it have some mathematical
correlation? My maths is pitiful!

Not = sure what to do now, I have another IC but before risking pad
damage tho= ught it prudent to ask, many thanks.

Pins 14 and 2 on the mixer IC s= how good, 90 degree out of phase square
waveforms of normal amplitude on= a scope, but at 153.814 KHz....

Schematic is at http://www.gatesgarth.co= m/schematic.jpg



--
Best regards,
Chris mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com

><= /p>


--f403045c22e253035e0563b08b85--