Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w01ECOkL023393 for ; Mon, 1 Jan 2018 15:12:25 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1eW0ir-0003gR-KE for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 01 Jan 2018 14:05:49 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1eW0ip-0003gI-KT for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 01 Jan 2018 14:05:47 +0000 Received: from smtp-out-2.talktalk.net ([62.24.135.66]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eW0iV-0007c7-0a for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 01 Jan 2018 14:05:46 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.4] ([2.98.121.32]) by smtp.talktalk.net with SMTP id W0iRe18RKNSVVW0iSerk5f; Mon, 01 Jan 2018 14:05:24 +0000 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=talktalk.net Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=talktalk.net; s=cmr1711; t=1514815524; bh=HKvZRvQu+oDoxu8HHljo9QZXYnKo9EJ7Kpqb3b5bbG4=; h=Subject:References:From:In-Reply-To:Date:To; b=e3UFnLbZUM8s5yDW8zJ/xpTSfoPInluvw6McQG1oydMD5xUgOE1ZkTvMT88DE5Hkw LIZ2/HkSiVFhjkg8VKjCwehh++LLPxzdSz7VRfEVlkLwaEco55C3/ZU0CTZ8uqv/oy qKCn5D3sSdnFSLp7WSsr1CSF6vtrDA7J2Wsdx4mA= X-Originating-IP: [2.98.121.32] X-Spam: 0 X-OAuthority: v=2.2 cv=NYGW7yL4 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=6/O84cueCPZQWFRE4vJs9g==:117 a=6/O84cueCPZQWFRE4vJs9g==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=VVlED5B4AAAA:8 a=F3M5lZpKAAAA:8 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=oCcaPWc0AAAA:8 a=1nARtFnn7syUn5HunZYA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=slCku8JSH3TyizEDQ3pD:22 References: <1245872871.20180101103858@gmail.com> <2B728BD9A22E47E991B5DABA279D0D27@Clemens0811> <188CDC35293448D088ABCA3CCC6B2184@Clemens0811> <831993214.20180101112620@gmail.com> <43E1315F9F0541D9965B368BDEA5F943@Clemens0811> From: Mal Hamilton X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (14G60) In-Reply-To: <43E1315F9F0541D9965B368BDEA5F943@Clemens0811> Message-Id: <5C7B5B7E-E9E7-4F5F-8115-F543EE2649EA@talktalk.net> Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2018 14:05:23 +0000 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfDp648L62OdIH0i3m3JFFQOqI7igYpHi6OZaPGEGmaPSoDYhv1eCI2msL7nd6JCDUHHklmkWMjs7btLBt1FfbaiFYMIAfunhYjyFM9gVcNPmUqUSqkjM Ee4G0AXrytsBE8Jr9qwh6kxfI5IFOYy2CrWJNCMcpuTGWgRupDCtwY8uJZ6MaqdgCbB3JO2OQF74RQ== X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Most hi power FET s I have used need around 10V in class D or E amps I.e. driver sq wave V Dr. Chip Tc 4426 or equivalent G3KEV > On 1 Jan 2018, at 12:07, Clemens Paul wrote: > [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 138e3b341e0543401afa7e97ee054540 Subject: Re: LF: RE: RE: Si5351A syntehsiser able to fire a FET driver chip directly?? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by klubnl.pl id w01ECOkL023393 Most hi power FET s I have used need around 10V in class D or E amps I.e. driver sq wave V Dr. Chip Tc 4426 or equivalent G3KEV > On 1 Jan 2018, at 12:07, Clemens Paul wrote: > > Thanks Clemens, I'd need two, correct? Could I try say 4 to 16 turns > on two FT-37-43 cores, which I have? A turns ratio of 4:16 gives a 1:4 voltage ratio so this ratio would require only one core. One could make one 1:4 (V) transformer or two cascaded 1:2 (V) ones, the latter probably being more feasible. But 4 turns for the primary on a FT37-43 give 4µH which is only 3.4 Ohms on 137kHz. This would probably eat up all the "ooomph" of the driver chip by the magnetizing current. I would suggest at least 500µH which is 430 Ohms on 137kHz. So you'd have to choose a different material,e.g. "J". With two cascaded FT 37-J's this would require 15 turns for the primary and 30 for the secondary which appears just manageable. A bigger core would make things easier,though. Then you could use one core with 15:60 turns. 73 Clemens DL4RAJ ill the Si synthesizer chip have > enough "ooomph" to drive them? > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Chris Wilson > Sent: Monday, January 1, 2018 12:26 PM > To: Clemens Paul > Cc: dead.fets@gmail.com > Subject: Re: LF: RE: RE: Si5351A syntehsiser able to fire a > FET driver chip directly?? > > > > Hello Clemens, > > Monday, January 1, 2018, 11:10:44 AM, you wrote: > >>> How about a 1:4 transformer? ->Voltage ratio! > > > Thanks Clemens, I'd need two, correct? Could I try say 4 to 16 turns > on two FT-37-43 cores, which I have? Will the Si synthesizer chip have > enough "ooomph" to drive them? > > > > > -- > Best regards, > Chris mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com > > > > --- > Diese E-Mail wurde von AVG auf Viren geprüft. > http://www.avg.com >