From: "Mike Dennison" <mike.dennison@ntlworld.com>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org, rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 11:14:45 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <5A61D325.11185.5109635@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com>
Content-description: Mail message body
Subject: LF: Mini whip antenna success
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

I have spent a few days experimenting with a mini whip active 
receiving antenna. As advised I decoupled the feeder by winding it 
around a ferrite core, and ensured the antenna was earthed to a stake 
at the foot of the (20ft) mast. It produced very good results on the 
136kHz band - about the same as my much larger and higher 
transmitting antenna, which is currently on the ground. 

However, the performance on 472kHz seemed poor. I was giving WSPR 
reports about 3-5dB below other stations. Eventually I found that the 
12v PSU (Watson Power-Mite) I used to power the whip had a lot of MF 
noise, and filtering the output failed to completely eliminate it. I 
replaced the PSU with another - also switch mode - and that did the 
trick. I am now giving reports as good as the best stations.

This is a very effective, yet ridiculously tiny, antenna which anyone 
can use to achieve good results on receive, no matter how small their 
garden is. But beware of PSU noise sabotaging it.

Not for the first time, I have found Opera and WSPR to be very useful 
tools in determining how well my station is working by being able to 
directly compare transmit and receive performance of other stations. 
Without this facility I might have just accepted the level of 
perfomance I was getting.

Mike, G3XDV
==========