Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w01IS7rE024198 for ; Mon, 1 Jan 2018 19:28:08 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1eW4ip-0004UM-Nn for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 01 Jan 2018 18:22:03 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1eW4io-0004UD-Qa for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 01 Jan 2018 18:22:02 +0000 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eW4il-0008UT-Mp for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 01 Jan 2018 18:22:01 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BBA120E10 for ; Mon, 1 Jan 2018 19:21:56 +0100 (CET) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1514830917; bh=afZKv/rvhFAXbH5OEG/2z3w3pv9bZnpHjbctF7LeK0M=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=ksqmCaxcYa8cwYpQ+yF6Q/U6m9fRvZLD7CDy3vkX4YVg1Vcq2eOUIBieNP5PEv511 IGdZe2DTqKXzZLDDouuTR23PNj2tddyGKxc1OLXzyKMFxhxPjBvDVgTUJAqX8SnH9R LeG/d+JlQaLNsVoXYdd45gs971aJfsPPEzYRhmkTQeCaOq6+BPXXKRS/q6wuZeHJBk CQDgLq/k0+ffgUEPSN8T94AUYifNBpkaG+qxX8wcqbrRWv1yrW5dh0TP3QeTRWWwxA 6FDhJYitmJVhBDttJyaHHWmhESL/wjiVJZyW9PJ8Z7/Xb4zz5iqz6kGqF3X9ZaAyq/ G2iq76LREF6DQ== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3z9QWk2VsPz9rxm for ; Mon, 1 Jan 2018 19:21:51 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5A4A7C3F.4000409@posteo.de> Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2018 19:21:51 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <160b2bc6404-171b-10e2@webjas-vac160.srv.aolmail.net> In-Reply-To: <160b2bc6404-171b-10e2@webjas-vac160.srv.aolmail.net> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Markus, Cool, that's an innovative idea indeed :-) Typical for you :-) 73, HNY 2018 Stefan [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: eeb98d9e5f7535b37e24952fd7f85252 Subject: Re: R: Re: VLF: Finally back on the 58 km band... Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020309060504070202030809" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------020309060504070202030809 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Markus, Cool, that's an innovative idea indeed :-) Typical for you :-) 73, HNY 2018 Stefan Am 01.01.2018 18:19, schrieb Markus Vester: > Now the nighttime carrier is also visible on the DL0AO grabber: Since > I know Stefan's EbNaut sequence, I've reconfigured the colour > spectrogram to undo the PSK modulation. > > Best 73, > Markus > > -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- > Von: DK7FC > An: rsgb_lf_group > Verschickt: Fr, 29. Dez 2017 20:15 > Betreff: Re: R: Re: VLF: Finally back on the 58 km band... > > Hello Marco, > > Am 29.12.2017 19:40, schrieb marcocadeddu@tin.it > : > > Hi Stefan, > > > > just a quick question ;-) does the used code such a big difference on > > the spectrum? > > I mean during this week you transmitted 7 times (one per > > day) a message (not decoded neither seen from my side :-( ) which is > > displayed on the DL0AO grabber like a plain carrier, today you started > > a longer message and no sign appears.. I cannot understand the reason :- > > | > > > The trace you saw on the DL0AO site was the carrier which was > transmitted between my EbNaut transmissions. I simply let the TX run all > the time, several days. The message is between the carriers and > invisible at DL0AO. > > 73, Stefan > --------------020309060504070202030809 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Markus,

Cool, that's an innovative idea indeed :-) Typical for you :-)

73, HNY 2018
Stefan



Am 01.01.2018 18:19, schrieb Markus Vester:
Now the nighttime carrier is also visible on the DL0AO grabber: Since I know Stefan's EbNaut sequence, I've reconfigured the colour spectrogram to undo the PSK modulation.

Best 73,
Markus

-----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: DK7FC <selberdenken@posteo.de>
An: rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Verschickt: Fr, 29. Dez 2017 20:15
Betreff: Re: R: Re: VLF: Finally back on the 58 km band...

Hello Marco,

Am 29.12.2017 19:40, schrieb marcocadeddu@tin.it:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> just a quick question ;-) does the used code such a big difference on
> the spectrum?
> I mean during this week you transmitted 7 times (one per
> day) a message (not decoded neither seen from my side :-( ) which is
> displayed on the DL0AO grabber like a plain carrier, today you started
> a longer message and no sign appears.. I cannot understand the reason :-
> |
>
The trace you saw on the DL0AO site was the carrier which was
transmitted between my EbNaut transmissions. I simply let the TX run all
the time, several days. The message is between the carriers and
invisible at DL0AO.

73, Stefan

--------------020309060504070202030809--