Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w07CZ3dB017887 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2018 13:35:04 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1eYA6j-0000jV-3Q for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 07 Jan 2018 12:31:21 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1eYA6i-0000jM-R7 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 07 Jan 2018 12:31:20 +0000 Received: from rgout0105.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk ([65.20.0.125] helo=rgout01.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eYA6f-00064C-Rt for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 07 Jan 2018 12:31:19 +0000 X-OWM-Source-IP: 86.186.115.212 (GB) X-OWM-Env-Sender: alan.melia@btinternet.com X-Junkmail-Premium-Raw: score=12/50,refid=2.7.2:2018.1.7.120615:17:12.455,ip=,rules=__HAS_MSGID, __SANE_MSGID, MSGID_32HEX_LC, INVALID_MSGID_NO_FQDN, __MSGID_32HEX, __HAS_FROM, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL_FROM, __TO_MALFORMED_2, __TO_NO_NAME, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT, __SUBJ_ALPHA_END, __MIME_VERSION, __CT, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN, __CTE, __HAS_X_PRIORITY, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI, __HAS_X_MAILER, USER_AGENT_OE, __OUTLOOK_MUA_1, __USER_AGENT_MS_GENERIC, __ANY_URI, __URI_NO_WWW, __CP_MEDIA_BODY, __FRAUD_MONEY_BIG_COIN_DIG, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE, __FORWARDED_MSG, __NO_HTML_TAG_RAW, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS, BODY_SIZE_1400_1499, __MIME_TEXT_P1, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY, __URI_NS, HTML_00_01, HTML_00_10, __FRAUD_MONEY_BIG_COIN, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL, MSG_THREAD, LEGITIMATE_SIGNS, __OUTLOOK_MUA, __PHISH_SPEAR_STRUCTURE_1, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS, __MIME_TEXT_P, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK, NO_URI_HTTPS, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS Received: from gnat (86.186.115.212) by rgout01.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk (9.0.019.13-1) (authenticated as alan.melia@btinternet.com) id 59745064112A2575 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 7 Jan 2018 12:31:16 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=btcpcloud; t=1515328277; bh=2BzL2UEZwFKJtp71WKaOcFVUOYcmZLpWT3DQ1a9dB44=; h=Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:X-Mailer; b=OTjLxMGpQ9/PFLUv6NSiv1tQCSl/XdvAd2uEPIVx2u5/ZdryFAKMBhXP2K5SGXfsM1eSW0njq2lUkT1/VN9FFl2+zvUBLqPB3nSCnarqOSDbb7Vx4FPI/A2KwM048Sih+eFBh0WkFUcL3AOqFvDMaOnBV5DQF5qhw8Nslxi4UbQ= Message-ID: <37472FD8403A4605AC7B42D3FC477954@gnat> From: "Alan Melia" To: References: , <5A4F5340.1273.5ECD49@roelof.ndb.demon.nl>, <5A51FA44.9869.7B5A20@roelof.ndb.demon.nl> Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2018 12:31:10 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Roelof, I checked when Paul mentioned that and notice the Dst was between zero and -10nT. it is not always a good indicator but interesting when it does follow the pattern. I have checked following Stefan's comments and the band performance seemed to be more dependent on his 'local' noise level (mainly static) It would seem from Laurence's data that low Dst does align with poor VLF levels at extreme range, but is not so obvious around Europe. [...] Content analysis details: (0.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.2 STOX_REPLY_TYPE No description available. 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 3b8620872b19e25fb6f4dfaf1256edc3 Subject: Re: LF: 630m band activity. WX in VO1 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Roelof, I checked when Paul mentioned that and notice the Dst was between zero and -10nT. it is not always a good indicator but interesting when it does follow the pattern. I have checked following Stefan's comments and the band performance seemed to be more dependent on his 'local' noise level (mainly static) It would seem from Laurence's data that low Dst does align with poor VLF levels at extreme range, but is not so obvious around Europe. Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: "Roelof Bakker" To: Cc: Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2018 10:45 AM Subject: Re: LF: 630m band activity. WX in VO1 > Hello Joe, > > Last night was much better than the night before. > > 73, > Roelof Bakker, pa0rdt > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > The following section of this message contains a file attachment > prepared for transmission using the Internet MIME message format. > If you are using Pegasus Mail, or any other MIME-compliant system, > you should be able to save it or view it from within your mailer. > If you cannot, please ask your system administrator for assistance. > > ---- File information ----------- > File: VO1NA47720180107.gif > Date: 7 Jan 2018, 11:11 > Size: 132444 bytes. > Type: GIF-image >