Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w0ECO2Qq012984 for ; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 13:24:05 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1eahFR-0004WR-OI for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 12:18:49 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1eahFR-0004WI-67 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 12:18:49 +0000 Received: from omr-m015e.mx.aol.com ([204.29.186.15]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eahFN-0007BZ-TR for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 12:18:47 +0000 Received: from mtaomg-maa01.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-maa01.mx.aol.com [172.26.222.143]) by omr-m015e.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id 7F7673800095 for ; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 07:18:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from core-acb06g.mail.aol.com (core-acb06.mail.aol.com [172.27.24.6]) by mtaomg-maa01.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id 4C6E638000081 for ; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 07:18:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from 188.194.222.230 by webjas-vae006.srv.aolmail.net (10.96.23.9) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Sun, 14 Jan 2018 07:18:42 -0500 Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 07:18:42 -0500 From: Markus Vester To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Message-Id: <160f49b88d3-1721-51c76@webjas-vae006.srv.aolmail.net> In-Reply-To: <3143f194-063f-db0b-3c6a-63e7922dc445@psk31.plus.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI X-MB-Message-Type: User X-Mailer: JAS STD X-Originating-IP: [188.194.222.230] x-aol-global-disposition: G DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20150623; t=1515932322; bh=wT8Kt69S+EmXGOf38lccIbxBDfQ4l10UGlMzgJRBq4c=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=vrJDMUv8yqFu7jeSDeXHczIbDxEn3FF9f9h7IDaFBy5Z/DhL8YU0QNgHIoEqo3i4n UGYPtvlnYqxOBpku0vEvU8bNP00+wj5+7ncBC+IzMFNpuVTRV9vWPnPX90N3JwL0UL NVTkb5AuDlDqT0XcX/GhEBVvQt27R/cjjGA/4CyY= x-aol-sid: 3039ac1ade8f5a5b4aa20715 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Eddie, yes I recall that many of your images were not visible, showing some upgrade advertisement instead. Now with the g3zjo.files.wordpress.com domain all look fine. ZEVS is slightly stronger before midday here, which seems consistent with the notion of more effective coupling to a shallower waveguide. Not sure if there's a summer/winter effect; at DL0AO we simply haven't been looking long enough yet, and I also suspect there may be a 6 or 10 dB TX power switching. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (markusvester[at]aol.com) -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 8ef270cc2ec30cd34b6313d7ada17a45 Subject: Re: ELF: Recent ZEVS activity Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_433680_2016748979.1515932322002" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false ------=_Part_433680_2016748979.1515932322002 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Eddie, yes I recall that many of your images were not visible, showing some upgrad= e advertisement instead. Now with the g3zjo.files.wordpress.com domain all = look fine.=20 ZEVS is slightly stronger before midday here, which seems consistent with t= he notion of more effective coupling to a shallower waveguide. Not sure if = there's a summer/winter effect; at DL0AO we simply haven't been looking lon= g enough yet, and I also suspect there may be a 6 or 10 dB TX power switchi= ng. Best 73, Markus (DF6NM) -----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung-----=20 Von: g3zjo An: rsgb_lf_group Verschickt: So, 14. Jan 2018 0:39 Betreff: Re: ELF: Recent ZEVS activity Hi Marcus On 11/01/2018 22:30, Markus Vester wrote: > See also: > G3ZJO 2012-05-12:=20 > https://g3zjoradio.wordpress.com/2012/05/12/more-on-82hz-radio-comms-zevs= -13669381/ Was there a ZEVS capture in the blog post in the link above or was it=20 missing ? Trying it locally I had a message about updating my Photobox account to=20 include third party images. Another demand for money after 10years of=20 free hosting I suspect. This could cause multiple losses of links in my=20 blog, there are hundreds of photos in that account. I could spend hours mending holes. On this occasion I have located the=20 file and loaded it directly into Wordpress, all is well now. The ZEVS signal in that capture can be compared with the live signal on=20 my Grabber today, a strength comparison with the 80Hz signal of unknown=20 origin can be made also, if it is indeed the same signal, now 0.1Hz=20 higher. In the post I talk of my suspicion that at this QTH the ZEVS=20 signal is much weaker in the winter months, the comparisons seem to=20 indicate that this is so. I will find out in 4 or 5 months time. 73 Eddie G3ZJO ------=_Part_433680_2016748979.1515932322002 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Eddie,

yes I recall that many&nbs= p;of your images were not visible, showing some upgrade advertisement&= nbsp;instead. Now with the g3zjo.files.wordpress.com domain all look f= ine. 

ZEVS is slightly stronger = before midday here, which seems consistent with the notion of more eff= ective coupling to a shallower waveguide. Not sure if there's a summer= /winter effect; at DL0AO we simply haven't been looking long enough ye= t, and I also suspect there may be a 6 or 10 dB TX power switching.

= Best 73,
Markus (DF6NM)

-= ----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: g3zjo <g3zj= o@psk31.plus.com>
An: rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_lf_group@bl= acksheep.org>
Verschickt: So, 14. Jan 2018 0:39
Betreff: Re: ELF: Recent ZEVS activity

Hi Marcus

On 11/01/2018 22:30= , Markus Vester wrote:
> See also:
> = G3ZJO 2012-05-12:
> https://g3zjoradio.wordpress.com/2012/05/12/more-on-82hz-r= adio-comms-zevs-13669381/

Was there a = ZEVS capture in the blog post in the link above or was it
= missing ?
Trying it locally I had a message about updating = my Photobox account to
include third party images. Another= demand for money after 10years of
free hosting I suspect.= This could cause multiple losses of links in my
blog, the= re are hundreds of photos in that account.
I could spend ho= urs mending holes. On this occasion I have located the
fil= e and loaded it directly into Wordpress, all is well now.
<= br abp=3D"2702">The ZEVS signal in that capture can be compared with the li= ve signal on
my Grabber today, a strength comparison with = the 80Hz signal of unknown
origin can be made also, if it = is indeed the same signal, now 0.1Hz
higher. In the post I= talk of my suspicion that at this QTH the ZEVS
signal is = much weaker in the winter months, the comparisons seem to
= indicate that this is so. I will find out in 4 or 5 months time.

73 Eddie G3ZJO

------=_Part_433680_2016748979.1515932322002--