Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w030IcX1029468 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2018 01:18:39 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1eWWCi-0000T6-5C for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 02 Jan 2018 23:42:44 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1eWWCh-0000Sx-RU for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 02 Jan 2018 23:42:43 +0000 Received: from mail-wr0-x229.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c0c::229]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eWWCd-0004gz-OM for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 02 Jan 2018 23:42:42 +0000 Received: by mail-wr0-x229.google.com with SMTP id w107so28143wrb.9 for ; Tue, 02 Jan 2018 15:42:39 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:message-id:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=K1uHqnob51kovm/XTal8tbtfR6WIPjBD0oOSx+XJRng=; b=TirMlI63GZ5MnIylaA4Q7DDvgesoJ6otEXgU8Vn/e3FKHwuuRWmtKTm5+7HGiH5bvt 9+4l/BksHWHDJT6MCSyQtTfpHpq1arNzspXczOubbFv0uvJc7EKXmCoFYYwFRC8i2u2M v1OH7XnRFbJR/o6zgL44UxWfcqO9WCm4ePyfJnnR4dOHVt8PtkkPRtXkChkKjjj6vvQS vvCQU2PF5/QTc0V9B4HavRWD5qn6TQ5tsZipAuZN2KxXNq16rHv632dnBI6d1H1ZjYgB 4rD5Qywgi7nUlshRC0Y83PEyOo4AUFZsg+/VZFVnDbpDmwVTJQABBL3ZTBqkoF2HqFBY u/QQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:message-id:to:subject:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=K1uHqnob51kovm/XTal8tbtfR6WIPjBD0oOSx+XJRng=; b=mV6dD+uLpvdZj4E/339DLMYNn2MNS7DTt3lZbzSqZTQtGQR+TJKkn84S4VA2QQcKIf ulsEc8zh+DXkohk+sVZkW+AqnLLnMQXRwS5Kmc3+Q0yS1KN7bgss8jAgu0n9ishCAZ+A c1nm+TGN5ErUty3Ox8/S+4UpS6omBd6mqeaXTtKTBKcIA2ru1Yi54MMVj70fFwnnJYNm GGjEgXHdAADM+5lBE7EEu8TOsVT/8Dn6hOHI1kH2i/4h6UNYXry5BuvFlDzPcc96kXwE 88xCnIzbioA8ePvAMk1Je7O+HVvgn7HRxZVYVkCCR/gKHpzzUuKlEImYvKPQ1E/iXywm 1F4Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mJGqRqbF/CFyrwPn1aOaxoGcyop/3f2+Nw55CItuttwB3oVP/qJ 3CqPdN80DaUgItUYqRafukUcvg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBosskAEC0b+/Df/z5qW/Lf2c3sZVtjtBhK07G//bNeiczqY8eJl/Sr0OS8JrsDvqzUAF4OV6lg== X-Received: by 10.223.201.9 with SMTP id m9mr13172978wrh.274.1514936558686; Tue, 02 Jan 2018 15:42:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from OfficeWin7.lan (82-70-254-222.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk. [82.70.254.222]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l1sm11145wmh.13.2018.01.02.15.42.37 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 02 Jan 2018 15:42:38 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2018 23:42:37 +0000 From: Chris Wilson X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1528851104.20180102234237@gmail.com> To: Markus Vester In-Reply-To: <1229868611.20180102233534@gmail.com> References: <781825051.20180101212433@gmail.com> <160b3a9c7d1-171c-1d653@webjas-vad221.srv.aolmail.net> <1229868611.20180102233534@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello, wrong link to waveforms, corrected below. > I added 2 off 86k resistors as resistive dividers as shown. Voltages > were as expected 1.87 and 1.86V on pins 2 and 4 but both driver output > pins sat high at circa 12V . Removing the added resistors but running > the MCP1404 on 9V all works fine with gate and drain waveforms as > shown here: [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dead.fets[at]gmail.com) 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 87966b345956c8ef3389b993f6a18f4e Subject: Re: LF: Si5351A syntehsiser able to fire a FET driver chip directly?? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hello, wrong link to waveforms, corrected below. > I added 2 off 86k resistors as resistive dividers as shown. Voltages > were as expected 1.87 and 1.86V on pins 2 and 4 but both driver output > pins sat high at circa 12V . Removing the added resistors but running > the MCP1404 on 9V all works fine with gate and drain waveforms as > shown here: > http://www.gatesgarth.com/9v.jpg -- Best regards, Chris mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com