Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id vBTDO628009762 for ; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 14:24:09 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1eUuYj-0007OS-AC for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 13:18:49 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1eUuYi-0007OJ-LT for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 13:18:48 +0000 Received: from mout.perfora.net ([74.208.4.194]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eUuYf-0002Yo-NO for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 13:18:47 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.125] ([72.224.254.201]) by mrelay.perfora.net (mreueus003 [74.208.5.2]) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0MHFEj-1ehtEx0tcZ-00E4f2 for ; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 14:18:40 +0100 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <1608d073056.marcocadeddu@tin.it> <4556666E6F7849679451F95BD8C43FAA@Clemens0811> <9dbb1de2-0d17-b64f-3051-fd63f1f29cc4@n1bug.com> <51D7E4AF62D34F388A618D1DEA4942D2@Clemens0811> <5ea52d97-4678-1781-e3b5-6f0d12c6a5fb@n1bug.com> From: N1BUG Message-ID: Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2017 08:18:38 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:Q/qkWIXY2O7GB2nOP0CYxrNTEZpIAGMuowcw3aK59fyScvKzOxD +IdFgcKcqL/Ns2mp4xXYyqutkgTkmmvqqeJgWbRh/mhiBa87EN7NgnqkMfobXHDcMm1k9Dd qm6T6BTv9o7TaIxDCT+VdZxSEymnvqYyzEHoZfi8gu9F7qD1r+ra4sRyGuBOOQvsTuyJyyW MrkO+jS7uWUmdjtVQDPNg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:43D2uh/CruY=:JJPSOnpJZRZXsaD2Z9ZFrH acoFc3RbHWGAkCJ0UTIDfdy/fbvxwngdd/BFfYsdG2oc+TNsmbVKd+ZNYlf+oGCkPsbFQlgMx 9RrQ6Yipnz+LxfjY/6JTpUU15LNOTU/NrpnajqZNdosHg9zFD+eSsgMCdavvsQr9cQtlQnsef ZCH8ht+4fcQx1edJ8Q/8CedT2Sb3pMCKKTyUgbuVmowf6ZjkrveN6iWm4ji5+AXu/1tzET9k4 GTDv9jewUeJfLFvkNq9JPy/+SXpgtt50XenhJu5R7WXMlOV/tZl9oRMOworpfLuq6N0Ki5RUa nI3EtEAZU4U3LGHHcb5Kl3D9f9eaipQao+aCsj71Ow7p7b1P3eIYPeUU8ocTTyqPqNDYexVd/ AOZONGfgcRwTcgN48QBfUCrqYjZcKay7/W0EmDdcUnzdtiYgW/donatYk2pN5mKWDXiYoRF8K c1ANjFJAV+/UomZPheBXsOfhE17lSb9hkV/YwjGArwuwgK2M978jHj14JDzTsKfpu0LC8zLuR frElFHTEI98+3nxeb4JsDxQMRAdwt7/tB/ufbAh7NBDM/zbLdUr9fxyWOxWOfr1e8vJTiy4rc 6Ql5cSokbTma4bif3npkNpv7GzNwPVbiZtNXb2+Ty+aje+Nw8NwErrVCS0Kuz6OZPVBbpQ2Wk jVILCNYDS5q1r9jJTsvcbSVrD0f1xr6/JbAU9Dj/Aj9dmJBGY7CYYoRvZ9piVTYmvqMlxF70e srzUI4pCF1AXhfG9ULeL6/vmUuZO3bDHYVwMaPpvdFWXtJ9jU6HqcF+8xLk= X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Clemens, OK, I understand about capacitive coupling in transformers. So I tried a simple common mode choke. At first 22 turns using RG-178 coax on a FT-114-JC (yes, made a typo last time). No change for better or worse with the choke. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Scan-Signature: 11963a33d604c33786d8f1de94ce267f Subject: Re: R: Re: LF: TXing 2200m WSPR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Clemens, OK, I understand about capacitive coupling in transformers. So I tried a simple common mode choke. At first 22 turns using RG-178 coax on a FT-114-JC (yes, made a typo last time). No change for better or worse with the choke. Maybe 22 turns is too much so I made it 18 turns. No change. 16... 14... 12... 10 turns. No change. Is the core too small? I could try stacking a few of these. I still have to try building a shielded box for the PA and LPF. This will take some days. Maybe it also needs shielding between input and output circuits of the PA. BTW I forgot to mention during the night I also tried a CM choke on the DC power feed (16 turns, FT-114-JC). No change at all. If I knew for sure that a different (properly built, proven design class D) PA would work here, I would not put any more effort into this PA. The trouble is I can't know that another PA would be OK. Note: RG-178 on a coated core is very slippery! But I was able to keep the turns tight with some tape! Paul N1BUG On 12/29/2017 07:08 AM, Clemens Paul wrote: > Hi Paul, > >> I can try common mode chokes instead of isolation transformers, but >> will this really be better? Seems if the problem is common mode >> current the iso xfmrs should kill it...?? > > Basically yes. > But we don't know how much capacitively coupling there is between primary and secondary > which might partially spoil the RF isolation. > I would just give it a try: > One chocke at the PA output is no big deal. > >> I still have a couple of ideas to try: Replace 50uH choke in PA with >> different type core. > > In Spice there's only a ca. +/- 0.5Vp voltage swing across the choke. > Hence the flux is less than 10% (3.7mT) of the max. flux for this core. > So no problem with that choke. > >> Use completely separate bias supply. > > In Spice it makes no difference. > > > 73 > Clemens > DL4RAJ > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >> [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of N1BUG >> Sent: Friday, December 29, 2017 11:40 AM >> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >> Subject: Re: R: Re: LF: TXing 2200m WSPR >> >> During the night I made a few more tests... >> >> Iso xfmr at PA output. 14T:14T on FT-114-JC core. Made the problem >> slightly WORSE. >> >> Iso xfmr at amp input. 4T:4T on 3 x BN73-202. Made the problem >> slightly WORSE. >> >> Removed iso xfmr from amp output, left iso on PA input. Slightly >> better than without iso anywhere, but still bad. >> >> Tried again all configurations of iso xfmrs (at antenna, at PA >> output, at PA input) using HP 3325B to drive the PA. No difference >>from using the Ultimate 3S. >> >> When I use an iso xfmr at the antenna the problem is WORSE than when >> I have the coax connected to the antenna ground. It's not a big >> change, but measurable and repeatable. >> >> Considered this might be an instrumentation problem with RF >> affecting the HP 1980B oscilloscope, but I can see the signal >> quality degrade in a receiver when the problem occurs so I don't >> think so. >> >> I can try common mode chokes instead of isolation transformers, but >> will this really be better? Seems if the problem is common mode >> current the iso xfmrs should kill it...?? >> >> I still have a couple of ideas to try: Replace 50uH choke in PA with >> different type core. Use completely separate bias supply. However >> since the PA works perfect into a dummy load I am not sure the PA is >> the problem. >> >> I will try to make a shielded box for the PA. That will take some time. >> >> The Ultimate 3S is in the metal case sold for it. This is not great >> because of the paint (or powder coat) at mating surfaces. I will try >> to work on that but since using the HP 3325B as a PA driver does not >> make any change I have doubts this will help. >> >> Paul N1BUG