To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <1608d073056.marcocadeddu@tin.it>
 <d877cf2d-4e75-b372-9bd2-302791f416b0@n1bug.com>
 <4556666E6F7849679451F95BD8C43FAA@Clemens0811>
From: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Message-ID: <e0a831c8-5a4b-1734-335e-58d995fa004a@n1bug.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2017 15:19:57 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4556666E6F7849679451F95BD8C43FAA@Clemens0811>
Content-Language: en-US
Subject: Re: R: Re: LF: TXing 2200m WSPR
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Hi Clemens,

Thank you for taking the time to run these simulations!

My Ultimate 3S does have a LPF before the feed to the PA. I 
understand some PAs prefer a square wave. Should I remove the LPF? I 
have a function generator which can make the same power as the 
Ultimate 3S with either sine or square wave. I could try that as a 
test...

Today I made some more tests. I can run a little more power before 
trouble begins when I have the primary (coax) and secondary 
(antenna) grounds tied together at the antenna! When I isolate the 
grounds, the problem is worse! What does this tell us?

I'm not sure how to make an effective common mode choke for this 
frequency. I can try another transformer at the shack if I can find 
a low power version that uses an inexpensive core. At this point I 
don't want to buy 3 x FT-240-77 cores for a <20W test. Any 
suggestions? I have some FT-144-JC cores. Any chance these could be 
used for a test?

Could I have some mistakes in my isolation transformer? I have 
primary turns spread around the whole core, with the secondary turns 
around almost the whole core placed between primary turns. But the 
primary and secondary windings do not start at the same position on 
the core. I thought this wouldn't matter. Maybe it does?

73,
Paul


On 12/28/2017 08:00 AM, Clemens Paul wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> 
>> I already have plans to build the big T type LPF.
> 
> Out of curiosity I've done some spice simulations of your PA.
> They indicate that a T type LPF won't help at all.
> This was to be expected because your PA is not a class D voltage mode
> push pull PA like W1VD's or IK1HSS's or 2E0ILY 's.
> Indeed the T type LPF will cause considerably higher voltage spikes at the FET'S drain.
> In the attached screenshot you can see three simulations,each with a different output filter.
> A shunt C LPF,a series L LPF and even a diplexer filter.
> The red traces represent voltage at the drain,green is DS current.
> With the diplexer voltage spikes are lowest.
> But I obviously the filter is not your problem.
> It seems that the near field of the antenna is causing the trouble.
> I would suggest to try a second isolation transformer or a good
> common mode choke *at the shack* end of your coax run instead of building a T-type LPF.
> 
> P.S. Has your Ultimate 3S a LPF installed before you feed it into the PA?
> 
> 73
> Clemens
> DL4RAJ
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
>> [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of N1BUG
>> Sent: Monday, December 25, 2017 1:15 PM
>> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
>> Subject: Re: R: Re: LF: TXing 2200m WSPR
>>
>> Hi Marco,
>>
>> I don't detect any heat in the LPF but at this low power level it
>> could be difficult to detect it.
>>
>> I already have plans to build the big T type LPF. I have the
>> T-225A-2 cores and metal to make a compartmented box. Capacitors are
>> on the way, could arrive around 29 December. I still need to order
>> the wire and some kind of material for mounting the big inductors.
>>
>> I'm making that LPF because eventually I will also build the big
>> amplifier. I'm not sure when that will happen, probably a bit late
>> for this LF season.
>>
>> The most curious thing is what seems to be some measurement error or
>> impedance transformation but the cause remains elusive. I hope to
>> find the reason so I can be more confident about measurements when I
>> go go high power.
>>
>> 73,
>> Paul N1BUG