Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id vBONLRl4020847 for ; Mon, 25 Dec 2017 00:21:29 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1eTFWi-0005OI-N0 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 24 Dec 2017 23:17:52 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1eTFWi-0005O5-CB for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 24 Dec 2017 23:17:52 +0000 Received: from mout.perfora.net ([74.208.4.194]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eTFWf-0006k2-KG for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 24 Dec 2017 23:17:51 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.125] ([72.224.254.201]) by mrelay.perfora.net (mreueus001 [74.208.5.2]) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0MLPtc-1eTnkv3Tdq-000hTo for ; Mon, 25 Dec 2017 00:17:47 +0100 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4ffc7958-810a-e4d2-7745-258a58338934@n1bug.com> <5A3AE81B.9010205@posteo.de> <5A3B8FB1.1020403@posteo.de> <7ee833a8-04b4-4712-d927-7eccf37eec14@n1bug.com> <5A3D9BC1.1040609@posteo.de> <6fa587ef-d5b0-6a67-b604-ba94144444f7@n1bug.com> <5A3E77DD.4090908@posteo.de> <103A2C60B87B4930A99ED33442E477AF@StevePC> <792271d9-34bb-3fb1-140c-c322015e2e9b@n1bug.com> <5A3F9D04.90800@posteo.de> <6be50d62-c33c-a781-1138-268803e0b6f1@n1bug.com> <1325698854.20171224230351@gmail.com> From: N1BUG Message-ID: Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2017 18:17:46 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1325698854.20171224230351@gmail.com> Content-Language: en-US X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:rUi03zupQCaLfMiyPXpfBmCoxfECh5XIpXH1OJP+nGKTM9QBOhE lsYvApSwZOeTYv+mUx2kixNQRwIK5YG58+1s6EsE+viG7HthyHCjtHISxI54uECdOGAEz7B Xf2/ftwaXJ/EQixZlBuL0EKvFAn6/vstm/XeHO4JFxmQvZBFOlMJiKF0h3P8sHUQ45A7C5i N8VdmT27deaOI1yaolUHg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:crWjT5wSd7w=:bbpCqCPYXYoEmZigmO17l8 K1EuuRu5d/LR1H/8XsIiEP3TWsIXATLaoiITmXGNfXmG7InPD3Rk9tQG7gk4JKvR6IUw3MrW2 Abs3kvdw56OIiG1JFMwmLu8xgmebEDrA9Sis3tlfucr1DMNhceAbCD2e7v0sZxXXtr+lD10wL fK+svf+b5JjkiOVEIxmb3bkttGA7XRzDAEGiBvvHh3SlS5rsX4xNcRW6l14x0tctQjtmpspQZ IupJEhyDJit7339VFPvtMmH2BIMf0ybTjiWufeN6fUdpgY1lKbYiD46RrvOc0ZI8ZIuV2n5q0 jJ79aRIMSxEJTEV4003VO2Shn3FBuDRMpLi6ryeRXXPZg527Hukpi5cmG+8zOjsbaDTiHtPba DSvqpA/+/g57BnX9LmVyqM5fI0I55I7e90qLpn25zy6HYwTYHnK+Cefr5p7Sf1V/2jIa4yGYU W6nINxjG9PXiGgxOI8ii4r9aqpkUEIZ//j770cZcL3coIzWgXWBKA9xHSWk1ZqOucyLn8osF2 PSOTbF0uQYW5/knbRz/jEin1V+LVvCZoTk+YG1YpOjeYk2vBssZJLlo3H4STL6m/VfQwoyn8y ms0S5ikK4dw8Tf8HEdw9f9ZelUGuEl4Z8WG1UCfPbUrEaUwPCwkn8Pc7PZCRu9DAyVIeemAGx VNUP3nzic4YiDp1VyLLYDE3fNKrwCROJyUVvM7Vf8A2zwtJ1ul0Be6/+UqBY7lRbzgTFvCeJC GgqVRxONfQL6HtbUJAm7xiFWaR3MtOJH8r8d16bMdVp1v71U7e8s8jt4KAM= X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: I think Chris has some really good ideas here. I did turn a test with the dummy load at the far end of the coax the other day. The amp didn't seem quite as happy as with the dummy load in the shack but almost. I will repeat that test since I have made changes to the amp since. I would like to see what happens with the dummy load on the other side of the matching transformer set for 1:1. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Scan-Signature: 4ead635eadbaebfaa92cfec77deb715d Subject: Re: LF: TXing 2200m WSPR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false I think Chris has some really good ideas here. I did turn a test with the dummy load at the far end of the coax the other day. The amp didn't seem quite as happy as with the dummy load in the shack but almost. I will repeat that test since I have made changes to the amp since. I would like to see what happens with the dummy load on the other side of the matching transformer set for 1:1. Paul N1BUG On 12/24/2017 06:03 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > Hello Andy, > > Is there any point in Paul putting his dummy load on the end of his > 75 odd meters of feeder co-ax outside? And then on the secondary of > his matching transformer when tapped one to one? In case the co-ax is > iffy or the impedance matching transfomer's doing something odd?