Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id vBALV6ue022664 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 22:31:09 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1eO97V-0005MV-1S for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 21:26:45 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1eO97U-0005MM-Ix for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 21:26:44 +0000 Received: from lethe.lipkowski.org ([151.80.54.59] helo=lipkowski.org) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eO97R-0000sF-RK for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 21:26:43 +0000 Received: from mailn.lipkowski.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id vBALSamR004119 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 10 Dec 2017 22:28:37 +0100 Received: from localhost (sq5bpf@localhost) by mailn.lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id vBALSacd004116; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 22:28:36 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: mailn.lipkowski.org: sq5bpf owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2017 22:28:35 +0100 (CET) From: Jacek Lipkowski To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org cc: Michael Smith In-Reply-To: <2dbcd2a8-0109-41e4-c0ca-aada17f54de8@abelian.org> Message-ID: References: <2dbcd2a8-0109-41e4-c0ca-aada17f54de8@abelian.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score-sq5bpf: -2.9 () ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 on 10.1.3.10 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Sun, 10 Dec 2017, Paul Nicholson wrote: > This is a most significant achievement. East to west is some > 20dB harder than the other direction! could you give a short explanation? i don't really understand nonreciprocal propagation [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: aee9e5eeb35c86f052d502ac97832558 Subject: Re: VLF: Transatlantic success East to West Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false On Sun, 10 Dec 2017, Paul Nicholson wrote: > This is a most significant achievement. East to west is some > 20dB harder than the other direction! could you give a short explanation? i don't really understand nonreciprocal propagation VY 73 Jacek / SQ5BPF