Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id vB7AfB4n000750 for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2017 11:41:14 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1eMtYL-0000m5-DA for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 07 Dec 2017 10:37:17 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1eMtYL-0000lw-4r for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 07 Dec 2017 10:37:17 +0000 Received: from lethe.lipkowski.org ([151.80.54.59] helo=lipkowski.org) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eMtYI-0008Pc-GX for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 07 Dec 2017 10:37:15 +0000 Received: from mailn.lipkowski.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id vB7Ad7Ic025820 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2017 11:39:08 +0100 Received: from localhost (sq5bpf@localhost) by mailn.lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id vB7Ad6CF025816 for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2017 11:39:07 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: mailn.lipkowski.org: sq5bpf owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 11:39:06 +0100 (CET) From: Jacek Lipkowski To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <876ba966-4bd3-d682-123c-aae9c39ee63b@abelian.org> Message-ID: References: <4d96a9d4-5f22-7650-872b-6344e9aea8e3@abelian.org> <5A19FF75.7080801@posteo.de> <5A1FFE7C.9050703@posteo.de> <5A226B0C.3080701@posteo.de> <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB9AAB0EB9@servigilant.vigilant.local> <5A25C304.3050607@posteo.de> <5A271218.9040803@posteo.de> <1d9b2c0d-5fd5-066d-8f66-e85a79f88f16@abelian.org> <876ba966-4bd3-d682-123c-aae9c39ee63b@abelian.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score-sq5bpf: -2.9 () ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 on 10.1.3.10 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Thu, 7 Dec 2017, Paul Nicholson wrote: > Some trials are called for and I can imagine a shell script already > being prepared at SQ5BPF. of course :) [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 4ad5f3f1a9241b934aaa5d0e23c9dc57 Subject: Re: VLF: First VLF detection DL > EA Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false On Thu, 7 Dec 2017, Paul Nicholson wrote: > Some trials are called for and I can imagine a shell script already > being prepared at SQ5BPF. of course :) unfortunately i don't have a place to run it. previous searches were done on a box with 176 cores (or 352 with HT), and unfortunately i don't have access to it now. so this time i will only do some variations of parameters, and not a full bruteforce search VY 73 Jacek / SQ5BPF