Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id vBOMx20w020772 for ; Sun, 24 Dec 2017 23:59:03 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1eTFAt-00058L-KC for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 24 Dec 2017 22:55:19 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1eTFAt-00058C-Ax for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 24 Dec 2017 22:55:19 +0000 Received: from mail-wm0-x235.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::235]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eTFAq-0006dQ-GB for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 24 Dec 2017 22:55:18 +0000 Received: by mail-wm0-x235.google.com with SMTP id g130so31664823wme.0 for ; Sun, 24 Dec 2017 14:55:15 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=7CWVvLFeBmf+NhFiquSjjLw4IYYra16DZZ30lMxyyHw=; b=Oja4CRppVCmhm908NTZW3BqocrPBNRM7xcnuizg8YQaCM+fnW89MPlEfl5/TwspYnh ofmAGVJC1hzxfm62Bcuaky3RmcZwS5RYNOtQWh1of47LAPXqEYf6/8F19AY65LNzQykh hf+Z40eTahVnvp4Vjni1C1UE0LPL73de2X+Rf00rvonxk1GJcyaUsMHt9o3t4bhESQAC TCg0fr7tGM2/vZar4pQDOuw2H50SplTwabZlg3bWxJIi9XVo49q2suceLgtDvLk7peQq XR+Vbb19MM50AVrZJuQVw4ejqVzg91gX2AcVx1ejdVZYTggHLE5Mje3+uLF/3LLxVRAv 7FZA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=7CWVvLFeBmf+NhFiquSjjLw4IYYra16DZZ30lMxyyHw=; b=aXt8XgIJ2lYLZK7ffcyVhwKRMnuwb+HGjgoMDf5IcLUiPXdOhvoxcPbmaoE6Om9ZDh USeN8mmonP/N9Jo8XFA1ip0I7H6+qCObGY6e9e9Hz/KPn0diFNN5KP1bmdT8Vs78YZKq dLTh62Dt6OHhbyH3PDHUVZSO/HFGh4YLMDRVTB1XgGW8mN2TR2v9UjxmVaQCMBz10EYu l3X0/TswPC4xs8lKDlLPJLpXHx6qT7fB0uj5U1TpZPchbDdJNZp9XCis2xlmCjyr68Jm ZzUPZWF1LrXQa1R9LHGlwT9TPzMAk4sj0pXmJn1QKpVk+Y5wMxQ0sKCQp0tkwzxjc30w prgg== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mLtG7IwwMo0Y1G3W8sKyJBlqUEeUhazLRz1kG6LE7A8t8Kv13Nq uUIF2Fqxtfexf2H9TI1bi2LC3bYOtP8lTE9qrJs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBos9dfruPBFgugQv8/wphDxs9i3hukiZUcN9zUBL//HaClIjTh7N6KrAsVVoPJEi1lH3IE7MhROjHdVClDAU/J0= X-Received: by 10.80.146.77 with SMTP id j13mr24956908eda.298.1514156115105; Sun, 24 Dec 2017 14:55:15 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.80.177.54 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Dec 2017 14:55:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4ffc7958-810a-e4d2-7745-258a58338934@n1bug.com> <5A3AE81B.9010205@posteo.de> <5A3B8FB1.1020403@posteo.de> <7ee833a8-04b4-4712-d927-7eccf37eec14@n1bug.com> <5A3D9BC1.1040609@posteo.de> <6fa587ef-d5b0-6a67-b604-ba94144444f7@n1bug.com> <5A3E77DD.4090908@posteo.de> <103A2C60B87B4930A99ED33442E477AF@StevePC> <792271d9-34bb-3fb1-140c-c322015e2e9b@n1bug.com> <5A3F9D04.90800@posteo.de> <6be50d62-c33c-a781-1138-268803e0b6f1@n1bug.com> From: Andy Talbot Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2017 22:55:14 +0000 Message-ID: To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Should have said when calculated for 137.0kHz 'jnt On 24 December 2017 at 22:42, Andy Talbot wrote: > ... Using exactly the values in the filter circuit diagram, 50R > transforms through the filter to 48.5 - j2.86 (Ret Loss = 30dB, VSWR = > 1.07) [Using GM3SEK's original Netcalc prog.] > > So that's pretty conclusive the ideal filter values will not be upsetting > things at the fundamental frequency. > > [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (andy.g4jnt[at]gmail.com) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: f38d515a9cad1e977fcfe251941a8120 Subject: Re: LF: TXing 2200m WSPR Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0c3a56601c9005611df1a2" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false --94eb2c0c3a56601c9005611df1a2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Should have said when calculated for 137.0kHz 'jnt On 24 December 2017 at 22:42, Andy Talbot wrote: > ... Using exactly the values in the filter circuit diagram, 50R > transforms through the filter to 48.5 - j2.86 (Ret Loss = 30dB, VSWR = > 1.07) [Using GM3SEK's original Netcalc prog.] > > So that's pretty conclusive the ideal filter values will not be upsetting > things at the fundamental frequency. > > --94eb2c0c3a56601c9005611df1a2 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Should have said when calculated for 137.0kHz
'jnt=

On 24 Decem= ber 2017 at 22:42, Andy Talbot <andy.g4jnt@gmail.com> wro= te:
...=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Usi= ng exactly the values in the filter circuit diagram, 50R transforms through= the filter to 48.5 - j2.86 (Ret Loss =3D 30dB,=C2=A0 VSWR =3D 1.07)=C2=A0 = =C2=A0[Using GM3SEK's original Netcalc prog.]

So tha= t's pretty conclusive the ideal filter values will not be upsetting thi= ngs at the fundamental frequency.=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0

--94eb2c0c3a56601c9005611df1a2--