Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id vBSL1lqt006608 for ; Thu, 28 Dec 2017 22:01:50 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1eUfEr-000407-03 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 28 Dec 2017 20:57:17 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1eUfEq-0003zy-6x for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 28 Dec 2017 20:57:16 +0000 Received: from mout.perfora.net ([74.208.4.194]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eUfEn-0007Gv-5j for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 28 Dec 2017 20:57:14 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.125] ([72.224.254.201]) by mrelay.perfora.net (mreueus002 [74.208.5.2]) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0LdWVQ-1fDNdn0ODS-00ingu for ; Thu, 28 Dec 2017 21:57:09 +0100 From: N1BUG To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <1608d073056.marcocadeddu@tin.it> <4556666E6F7849679451F95BD8C43FAA@Clemens0811> Message-ID: <9dbb1de2-0d17-b64f-3051-fd63f1f29cc4@n1bug.com> Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2017 15:57:08 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:5eyii1PeREXPgRSajtLuwUuBmT06Ht4x9h/FA6w/OYv+zRllGu6 S7UzgcxoCYdvEPgG/nmHhGkVeJ5983diRpYbjobXij+dfKSp54tmgrPcFn9L6NhQGkPDHh2 jKkWRqyMp8Aar+AYxJnFry1ws+4qusZ1Fe/npb5nlh9DcIHTv+YYlI3/iGQtST6NvLFvaWX uK+ZFFyyRBV/GSwhh5Weg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:JdMydVdzrnE=:7Qv9n5wZHQuxwyGWArQpy4 rpp2OJN2Nw+G/DudzvO2+4+QrYl5+YWeAFWL0sukEoVm1Jiln+ffUB8UMnHo6nGyPgeqGdaIE 32Z8P3Wx1T6v6VLpKf3UzxzZA0AsETGJN9FrKxGntMYjLVHceBN3AuQELHNdD2wUcB9zQkQNY D55f4BmrRXIK3nCREUWAagzuH7fv4K3DDLt9l8T+UuAKHZgv5Mf5UzFWFchcD+gXLFQk2BvGJ 04PbIMxp/wFyQRksRIdM9bOeRGpxUwSl5E7rTQTeAx6PcQr/aqlq8+p7oCsG+JRL4DCWjin/E Bz6SV9h1JKEPiclnx98HIcbcrHxtlW5wDvSKyOlLAdtZLhGVMuhaxM6D69Zboi3oepwPIDRUz +5rRkUOs5e4doUcPlnlv+uXCFCr4mNU+ApbhRWOzXLYzoFWkCgWpfgqvkSfme3T7EAYOCpMKc GVXT3PgzxBvtNgl6cUx/ffNwuU4/3c9dgIn8o/uHsK7I5z2cPbkDk9YUBXZxEA6gvSqMSiNGS MXbNflwZ1+NtOZHAnzh8SUA4BxlIT7U8Aa3GuXcSYeCi26VZgfLe5Bvn3fT2IQw1QSKImYwFA +JW3aXiS2/ypsOd6h9GJYJRMFSS1yOth1H2fRp3cZ3PfEhMhh2k8d+j4CMnm78i12keu5tSpT da069xJjaLAfi9Us1sWX8P/7hjcPxzuSO+klJNFubL/c6z2Iwyo6M4WiItI0FGpu2J2+FHMjg aZcAPYytcHthXt8fJT/u5CKmfjjb5lP7b1z0G8DFNn2JgEGHgtZ0VtuKwqs= X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: I was able to make a few more tests without getting frostbite. :) I disconnected the coax from the matching transformer (at the antenna) and put the coax into a dummy load. All OK, exactly the same as when the dummy load is in the shack. I guess the coax is OK. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Scan-Signature: 24b65a258fa7a3a87cfdaa03bb2f3176 Subject: Re: R: Re: LF: TXing 2200m WSPR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false I was able to make a few more tests without getting frostbite. :) I disconnected the coax from the matching transformer (at the antenna) and put the coax into a dummy load. All OK, exactly the same as when the dummy load is in the shack. I guess the coax is OK. Next I connected the coax as usual to the primary of the matching transformer. I put the dummy load on the transformer secondary and set the transformer taps for 1:1 ratio. All OK, amp was completely happy. I did see a very small phase error between current and voltage on the scopematch, but nothing more than a couple of degrees. It seems the problem must be RF getting into something, RF current where it does not belong, but only when feeding the antenna. An important note: There is no such thing as complete isolation of antenna ground from shack AC power ground here. Both towers are grounded for lightning protection, one has an extensive radial field because I shunt feed the tower on 160m. All of the 160m - HF - VHF coax cables are grounded to antennas and towers, so the antenna ground is connected in the shack to other equipment. Of course that equipment is connected to the power ground through 3 wire cords. What can I do? 73, Paul N1BUG On 12/28/2017 03:19 PM, N1BUG wrote: > Hi Clemens, > > Thank you for taking the time to run these simulations! > > My Ultimate 3S does have a LPF before the feed to the PA. I > understand some PAs prefer a square wave. Should I remove the LPF? I > have a function generator which can make the same power as the > Ultimate 3S with either sine or square wave. I could try that as a > test... > > Today I made some more tests. I can run a little more power before > trouble begins when I have the primary (coax) and secondary > (antenna) grounds tied together at the antenna! When I isolate the > grounds, the problem is worse! What does this tell us? > > I'm not sure how to make an effective common mode choke for this > frequency. I can try another transformer at the shack if I can find > a low power version that uses an inexpensive core. At this point I > don't want to buy 3 x FT-240-77 cores for a <20W test. Any > suggestions? I have some FT-144-JC cores. Any chance these could be > used for a test? > > Could I have some mistakes in my isolation transformer? I have > primary turns spread around the whole core, with the secondary turns > around almost the whole core placed between primary turns. But the > primary and secondary windings do not start at the same position on > the core. I thought this wouldn't matter. Maybe it does? > > 73, > Paul > > > > On 12/28/2017 08:00 AM, Clemens Paul wrote: >> Hi Paul, >> >>> I already have plans to build the big T type LPF. >> >> Out of curiosity I've done some spice simulations of your PA. >> They indicate that a T type LPF won't help at all. >> This was to be expected because your PA is not a class D voltage mode >> push pull PA like W1VD's or IK1HSS's or 2E0ILY 's. >> Indeed the T type LPF will cause considerably higher voltage spikes at the FET'S drain. >> In the attached screenshot you can see three simulations,each with a different output filter. >> A shunt C LPF,a series L LPF and even a diplexer filter. >> The red traces represent voltage at the drain,green is DS current. >> With the diplexer voltage spikes are lowest. >> But I obviously the filter is not your problem. >> It seems that the near field of the antenna is causing the trouble. >> I would suggest to try a second isolation transformer or a good >> common mode choke *at the shack* end of your coax run instead of building a T-type LPF. >> >> P.S. Has your Ultimate 3S a LPF installed before you feed it into the PA? >> >> 73 >> Clemens >> DL4RAJ >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >>> [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of N1BUG >>> Sent: Monday, December 25, 2017 1:15 PM >>> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >>> Subject: Re: R: Re: LF: TXing 2200m WSPR >>> >>> Hi Marco, >>> >>> I don't detect any heat in the LPF but at this low power level it >>> could be difficult to detect it. >>> >>> I already have plans to build the big T type LPF. I have the >>> T-225A-2 cores and metal to make a compartmented box. Capacitors are >>> on the way, could arrive around 29 December. I still need to order >>> the wire and some kind of material for mounting the big inductors. >>> >>> I'm making that LPF because eventually I will also build the big >>> amplifier. I'm not sure when that will happen, probably a bit late >>> for this LF season. >>> >>> The most curious thing is what seems to be some measurement error or >>> impedance transformation but the cause remains elusive. I hope to >>> find the reason so I can be more confident about measurements when I >>> go go high power. >>> >>> 73, >>> Paul N1BUG