Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id vBTJIo4P010907 for ; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 20:18:53 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1eV06O-0000Ts-EK for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 19:13:56 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1eV06N-0000Tj-QG for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 19:13:55 +0000 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eV06L-0004em-1O for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 19:13:54 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE5FE20E63 for ; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 20:13:50 +0100 (CET) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1514574830; bh=CyhYfYzEJMOWnLZa0sOKQbtWY5etkUMo3cMSBzVap7k=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=pSy5wte5MjHBDO13UBCaEiWDa9Ps2gxJhDFdVNkECE5Q89pm4u0XOu2+1rZ+aknV/ 8iT2xBFMnvAtIgrZgiglaJ49+0oqcXJTFA63S/YHL7V/nUIkmSdzSsjOkjz0tjqmU4 4DT9C4kOm2ea1DizRBHpgcY0VxHzavpsV3kRy9oFCddJCSvGw8qAqVcBLEHTZN4bf1 Atnb36kzPXDeibLWKtxNrHOkOY+IMr0wfwkZQjOm4O/EK5YD/nQn/hc3MfFFATLdIk 9cmUZr1NIkLxVzPbBlfngByRTfhEgEo6vN8kkqRqJUU+sTVAST0P0U8NnJN4jJP6vN dHhqvx6oepw7w== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3z7bq20YClz9rxC for ; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 20:13:50 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5A4693ED.8080900@posteo.de> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2017 20:13:49 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <160a3937bdc.marcocadeddu@tin.it> In-Reply-To: <160a3937bdc.marcocadeddu@tin.it> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Marco, Am 29.12.2017 19:40, schrieb marcocadeddu@tin.it: > Hi Stefan, > > just a quick question ;-) does the used code such a big difference on > the spectrum? > I mean during this week you transmitted 7 times (one per > day) a message (not decoded neither seen from my side :-( ) which is > displayed on the DL0AO grabber like a plain carrier, today you started > a longer message and no sign appears.. I cannot understand the reason :- > | > The trace you saw on the DL0AO site was the carrier which was transmitted between my EbNaut transmissions. I simply let the TX run all the time, several days. The message is between the carriers and invisible at DL0AO. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 4ead635eadbaebfaa92cfec77deb715d Subject: Re: R: Re: VLF: Finally back on the 58 km band... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hello Marco, Am 29.12.2017 19:40, schrieb marcocadeddu@tin.it: > Hi Stefan, > > just a quick question ;-) does the used code such a big difference on > the spectrum? > I mean during this week you transmitted 7 times (one per > day) a message (not decoded neither seen from my side :-( ) which is > displayed on the DL0AO grabber like a plain carrier, today you started > a longer message and no sign appears.. I cannot understand the reason :- > | > The trace you saw on the DL0AO site was the carrier which was transmitted between my EbNaut transmissions. I simply let the TX run all the time, several days. The message is between the carriers and invisible at DL0AO. 73, Stefan