Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id vBAAsodp020651 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 11:54:53 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1eNz4L-0003cd-Ac for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 10:42:49 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1eNz4K-0003cU-Dm for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 10:42:48 +0000 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eNz4H-0006vs-Mv for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 10:42:47 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AAE420DF4 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 11:42:41 +0100 (CET) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1512902563; bh=ytXd9Lbj44VPJrMi/e7EnW77C+lHtoeshCk0Mr1tljs=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=gHmntGA7wF+IEy6cj5gifXohxgCdfn5JOOmD8Y4nq8m/ipEp9uSc9ckhe09lheJD1 rEa7pNtN8psDCszIdz32bNebq23UnS8j81ijiRzeXLojg2rNqEhGW4aD30D4bQSxV2 4t/sgEXD0DStJDMcjDiYK/+Tew4necgxV2hK9qUwj6Qctqj3m1l/MMVgX5WNUswJfW iMkkE+vpwVD6WuYg1q8w2LxTTBa6Zuhd4AZ1P5OxzRW8c30JLyi3klDYg/OKQWWQsb Tmd0Nj6t66cDqVRGRA4SuQvqm4D8XFqAHeCVb9Jb0XL4tMqER6lvSfPvMVzFignR8P GEJZGmy5Ay7gQ== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3yvjN04hxrz9rxS for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 11:42:40 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5A2D0F9F.6000006@posteo.de> Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2017 11:42:39 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4d96a9d4-5f22-7650-872b-6344e9aea8e3@abelian.org> <5A1FFE7C.9050703@posteo.de> <5A226B0C.3080701@posteo.de> <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB9AAB0EB9@servigilant.vigilant.local> <5A25C304.3050607@posteo.de> <5A271218.9040803@posteo.de> <5A282BF9.4050409@posteo.de> <5A29193A.2090600@posteo.de> <5A29A373.6060406@posteo.de> <5A29AF93.9030908@posteo.de> <5A2BE80E.4020307@posteo.de> <32eb0d8b-8984-1bce-e3f1-86e592836f59@abelian.org> In-Reply-To: <32eb0d8b-8984-1bce-e3f1-86e592836f59@abelian.org> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Thanks for your efforts. I transmitted the message last night again. So the message should decode now when stackjng these two nights. I'm looking forward to the result :-) 73, Stefan Am 09.12.2017 23:48, schrieb Paul Nicholson: > > > Now there was the carrier during the whole night with 1.2 A . > > Do you have some recommendations for me regarding the best > > time window for that path? > > Well I haven't been able to detect any carrier at Forest > last night. It looked like a noisy night and there was a > high drop factor from the sferic blanker. > > I tried a range of blanker settings and got the 1-char > Eb/N0 up to -1.1 dB but the decoder still wants to > latch on to the '4'. > > Will you continue with the carrier? > > -- > Paul Nicholson > -- > [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 2e2f7cbbe9f38dd7bf3fac4fc012e6fc Subject: Re: VLF: TA east to west? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Thanks for your efforts. I transmitted the message last night again. So the message should decode now when stackjng these two nights. I'm looking forward to the result :-) 73, Stefan Am 09.12.2017 23:48, schrieb Paul Nicholson: > > > Now there was the carrier during the whole night with 1.2 A . > > Do you have some recommendations for me regarding the best > > time window for that path? > > Well I haven't been able to detect any carrier at Forest > last night. It looked like a noisy night and there was a > high drop factor from the sferic blanker. > > I tried a range of blanker settings and got the 1-char > Eb/N0 up to -1.1 dB but the decoder still wants to > latch on to the '4'. > > Will you continue with the carrier? > > -- > Paul Nicholson > -- >