Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id vB5Cn0hE024892 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 13:49:01 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1eMCad-0000M9-UW for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 05 Dec 2017 12:44:47 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1eMCad-0000M0-Bw for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 05 Dec 2017 12:44:47 +0000 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eMCaa-0006QE-Hv for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 05 Dec 2017 12:44:46 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A984E21106 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 13:44:42 +0100 (CET) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1512477883; bh=LWNlc614XTc19SEp2ulY+GI+FP1tGFPOz6fk3wPsPPg=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=EYWlDJcgLjGuDXAshoVONE3HNpmAEYgppcWgnL4yunLDNCIGTUTrNNgyv2p0zkbRF 3PhWMJislG06W9dzXVLpuh+eZFEkdJMFvNE5tUh3nu5fomXAnB7mahlsC0loriPc/Q ubCyPUURhNpaZmiVdZwL5lHsY7tV9y8P6g4jA849RIUh405/NcvVYurTi1sZj7dOjl hQBOW6/xl4Vgb/daLpD74mtiAkJemI317vDp7JdaoLIKP0hcVkG+jLQH8tm7S4PkY2 dFz+jUNRux9CY8Azsw5B0B9gE0P+0v7H2nxB5psArRCqva/0YTTVZiUcY/yz3qRB+a qN67Re9NcQIfA== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3yrhK56ZL4z9rxD for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 13:44:41 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5A2694B9.4050407@posteo.de> Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2017 13:44:41 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4d96a9d4-5f22-7650-872b-6344e9aea8e3@abelian.org> <00f901d36646$feda4e60$fc8eeb20$@comcast.net> <085dd850-9c10-16a0-70ef-fb2de079ffb8@abelian.org> <023201d367cf$8a5761b0$9f062510$@comcast.net> <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB9AAAF572@servigilant.vigilant.local> <2166618d-7238-0516-367c-2f917532eed2@abelian.org> <5A20A4EC.4060009@posteo.de> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Sounds good! What do you estimate, what is the 'gain' on 2970 Hz relative to the old system from the last season? Soon there will be a signal on 5170 Hz again. Next week at the latest. 73, Stefan [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: fc152e7304849b9a177649b85aea9f41 Subject: Re: LF: RE: Todmorden receiver Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sounds good! What do you estimate, what is the 'gain' on 2970 Hz relative to the old system from the last season? Soon there will be a signal on 5170 Hz again. Next week at the latest. 73, Stefan Am 05.12.2017 12:09, schrieb Paul Nicholson: > > New H-field rx is coming along well. Design changes are > completed - it has a lower system noise, wider bandwidth, > significantly lower common mode response, and a much better > line driver. Like the new E-field rx, it also has a built-in > calibration port. > > Currently testing the design changes on breadboard and it > performs just as per the Spice model, except for a higher than > expected system noise. Should be just below 0.1fT in 1Hz > but I'm measuring 0.46 fT. Maybe this specimen of LT1028 > is a bit noisier than others? It's my last one but I've > got more arriving hopefully today. I'll pick the best two. > Even with this mysterious extra system noise, it's still 20dB > below the natural noise floor after sferic blanking. > > Apart from that it is working perfectly, just as per design > and looks very good at 137 kHz too. > > Hopefully will be able to start the cutting and drilling and > filing and soldering this week. That's my least favourite part > of the job. > > What I won't discover until it's finished and installed, is > whether it actually cures the excess noise at 8kHz and 5kHz > that we've seen lately. I haven't been able to identify the > cause of the relatively (compared to E-field) poor S/N on the > existing rx. Hopefully it is a low level of intermod in the > line driver. If so the new rx will not suffer that problem > and we'll see another step improvement in the 8270 spectrogram. > > -- > Paul Nicholson > -- >