Message-ID: <5A21E241.5070803@posteo.de>
Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2017 00:14:09 +0100
From: DK7FC <selberdenken@posteo.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <1600ece86fd-171b-256f@webjas-vac163.srv.aolmail.net> <5A209D96.5070807@posteo.de> <5A21657B.7030308@posteo.de> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1712012224570.734@mailn.lipkowski.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1712012224570.734@mailn.lipkowski.org>
Subject: Re: VLF: DK7FC close to SAQ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Hello Jacek, Markus, Max, Paul,

Thanks for the feedback.
Not what we expected, hm? ;-)
Maybe the groundwave/skywave interference is more expressed and the 
regions are smaller(?), at least in these short ranges below 2000 km. In 
some locations the signal is about as good as expected. DL0AO, IW4DXW 
and G3ZJO seem to be the winners so far, with good SNR. On Eddies 
grabber it is clearly visible that the night time propagation is better 
on that path.
The ERP is about 10 dB higher than on 8.27 kHz now. Since 14 UTC there 
was no interruption of the carrier.
Still no trace at RC4HAA. Traces at EA5DOM are a bit better but i am 
still not completely convinced. The trace at IK0VVE looks good but maybe 
we can get a better image tomorrow when the carrier was on the air at 
night without interruptions.

I'm beginning to miss the low frequencies :-)

73, Stefan


Am 01.12.2017 22:52, schrieb Jacek Lipkowski:
> I've made a temporary grabber for 17.4701kHz here:
>
> https://klubnl.pl/wpr/en/index.php/klubnl-pl-grabbers/tymczasowy-grabber-sq5bpf-do-testow-stefana-dk7fc-na-17-4701hz/ 
>
>
> Unfortunately no signals were received so far. This is strange, 
> because i would expect a great signal from Stefan, much stronger than 
> 8.27kHz.
>
> VY 73
>
> Jacek / SQ5BPF
>
>
>