Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id vBNM0LRX014343 for ; Sat, 23 Dec 2017 23:00:24 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1eSrl2-0008SE-CI for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 23 Dec 2017 21:55:04 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1eSrl1-0008S5-P9 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 23 Dec 2017 21:55:03 +0000 Received: from smtp-out-no.shaw.ca ([64.59.134.12]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eSrkx-0002qb-8A for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 23 Dec 2017 21:55:02 +0000 Received: from StevePC ([24.108.60.123]) by shaw.ca with SMTP id SrkpeCfhgZ8gBSrkqej5Ks; Sat, 23 Dec 2017 14:54:54 -0700 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=shaw.ca Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=shaw.ca; s=s20150330; t=1514066094; bh=ye4MDlEUyk+o4omXYpiLF8phWS+I2KaKCRZgidrMmLI=; h=From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date; b=WJYjrLr3gKWmDeyNF7xNVR0M3lZn4aJNCOBmCy1H6+Yz+8noq0srAyXqeIpQNwq5W sl7PM2DsPEgp0FDIPybB9Pzql0LB6OHkdUpKR1NHkOfKPQCqI6Ybr2vyl8zfp767a6 e1QUOE/9eXhj4EHeUs95rnBrYDEAgpES54OkYipEhGe0TQkGlMeBjlgNhOW56Xoz8D 9QzB2S4G9fFk6swdRTmT8J15F/CiG1MTLUJyDywAXqvHLxu4DEa5pZ3J0U5uqyrJY+ mrbZaSiaFidOw6+UvTGWltOOhoBifbc03eNdBr6qCubRanL5jqAhZbkOY2MvqXFG+s ZO5D6wiRh4LYg== X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=M/g9E24s c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=02AN2SbtWL/JWAP7bjKH1A==:117 a=02AN2SbtWL/JWAP7bjKH1A==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=x7bEGLp0ZPQA:10 a=QejfARXMAAAA:8 a=eL5lqVd3AAAA:8 a=55mqqMxTCLuWvwm2cs0A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=jsmAumcsUXIA:10 a=BC3gsuZa1vz2YJYxs7Nf:22 a=r5fwSD0_7PCr-xOGcPf9:22 Message-ID: <103A2C60B87B4930A99ED33442E477AF@StevePC> From: "Steve" To: References: <4ffc7958-810a-e4d2-7745-258a58338934@n1bug.com> <5A3AE81B.9010205@posteo.de> <5A3B8FB1.1020403@posteo.de> <7ee833a8-04b4-4712-d927-7eccf37eec14@n1bug.com> <5A3D9BC1.1040609@posteo.de> <6fa587ef-d5b0-6a67-b604-ba94144444f7@n1bug.com> <5A3E77DD.4090908@posteo.de> In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2017 13:54:51 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6002.18197 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6002.19728 X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfFZIhn5WJDMOxPj0upzr4e8rqgnDtuIi9admiQVR4BEJ2lNmbwLK5h8zPnDSml899X6IyD3/GMo8bqM+Uj/Sy3gaYCJwLxk3obDSuKArRpJrqhsA2Sip XMpI5YV/7x6yz1++oQgHiEndfV9z8zaxTYWtgzg/VU2OPnM7P1FJALgp X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > It will run perfectly stable into the 50 ohm dummy load at 25 watts > output. Into the antenna it will do no better than 17 watts, usually less > before something goes wrong. This looks suspiciously like there is still some reactance in the antenna system Paul. If it's anything these amplifier types can't tolerate it is reactance in the output. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 4ead635eadbaebfaa92cfec77deb715d Subject: Re: LF: TXing 2200m WSPR Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false > It will run perfectly stable into the 50 ohm dummy load at 25 watts > output. Into the antenna it will do no better than 17 watts, usually less > before something goes wrong. This looks suspiciously like there is still some reactance in the antenna system Paul. If it's anything these amplifier types can't tolerate it is reactance in the output. Steve WEB - "The VE7SL Radio Notebook": http://qsl.net/ve7sl/ VE7SL BLOG - "Homebrewing and Operating Adventures From 2200m to Nanowaves": http://ve7sl.blogspot.ca/