Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id vAQLmNZh018703 for ; Sun, 26 Nov 2017 22:48:26 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1eJ4gy-00027Y-SP for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 26 Nov 2017 21:42:24 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1eJ4gx-00027P-VS for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 26 Nov 2017 21:42:23 +0000 Received: from out2305.xtra.co.nz ([210.55.143.52]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eJ4gu-0008Sm-B0 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 26 Nov 2017 21:42:22 +0000 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=xtra.co.nz Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=xtra.co.nz; s=alpha; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; i=@xtra.co.nz; t=1511732532; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc; bh=saD4ORnRXAqrHRLmDgJvL2wb0YieKxNRSoDKZLhNYC8=; b=rEG7wTqONy0I3PK6PzZohRM89m9spd+wS//T9EDtek9iVGjiiAozk/zcrZCKcIGD MjkcM8hN0e3KTyZTOMuQ46lMYq0TrTxpeuVwY7PYs3h0zsVstJqR/o1OIBNLpW2e N6RyIB9YbqhM/Xe0y3LEUdcDRFp5afsadVXgW29UgjY=; Received: from [125.238.91.227] by send.xtra.co.nz with ESMTP (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) id 5A1B3533-83D70F5E@mta2307.omr; Sun, 26 Nov 2017 21:42:12 +0000 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org, "rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk" References: From: ZL2AFP Message-ID: Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 10:42:09 +1300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-Spam-Score: 1.6 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Here in ZL we have been using 472.5 kHz USB dial frequency to keep away from an AM broadcast intermod product on 477 kHz that affects reception of a Wellington station, but 474.0 kHZ USB sounds like a sensible frequency. It is just below the WSPR segment so should not affect WSPR reception unduly. [...] Content analysis details: (1.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.6 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject is all capitals 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (zl2afp[at]xtra.co.nz) -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: b14bcaca65d4b584f77d02a84d381cb4 Subject: Re: LF: ZL QSO Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------5F2C23C2D6229AD63FA6CB24" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, LINES_OF_YELLING,LINES_OF_YELLING_2 autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------5F2C23C2D6229AD63FA6CB24 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Here in ZL we have been using 472.5 kHz USB dial frequency to keep away from an AM broadcast intermod product on 477 kHz that affects reception of a Wellington station, but 474.0 kHZ USB sounds like a sensible frequency. It is just below the WSPR segment so should not affect WSPR reception unduly. There are only two stations in ZL who are active, and it is an excellent daytime chat mode, with groundwave extending at least out to 400km (for 1/2 to 1 watt radiated). It is early days for this mode so any feedback is more than welcome. A G/ZL QSO on 630m would be great but probably unlikely. But even one-way reception would be a milestone. I will reset my receiver to 474 kHz USB and see what there is to see! 73 Con, ZL2AFP On 27/11/2017 4:29 a.m., mal hamilton wrote: > > NW QRV WSQCALL ON MF/474 KHZ BUT WHAT IS THE ZL FREQ FOR A QSO THIS > EVENING OR IS THERE A 160M FREQ ALSO > > NW ACTIVE CQ ON 474 FOR TEST QSO, ANYONE ABOUT > > DE MAL/G3KEV > > Sent from Mail for > Windows 10 > --------------5F2C23C2D6229AD63FA6CB24 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Here in ZL we have been using 472.5 kHz USB dial frequency to keep away from an AM broadcast intermod product on 477 kHz that affects reception of a Wellington station, but 474.0 kHZ USB sounds like a sensible frequency. It is just below the WSPR segment so should not affect WSPR reception unduly.

There are only two stations in ZL who are active, and it is an excellent daytime chat mode, with groundwave extending at least out to 400km (for 1/2 to 1 watt radiated).

It is early days for this mode so any feedback is more than welcome. A G/ZL QSO on 630m would be great but probably unlikely. But even one-way reception would be a milestone. I will reset my receiver to 474 kHz USB and see what there is to see!

73
Con, ZL2AFP

On 27/11/2017 4:29 a.m., mal hamilton wrote:

NW QRV WSQCALL ON MF/474 KHZ BUT WHAT IS THE ZL FREQ FOR A QSO THIS EVENING OR IS THERE A 160M FREQ ALSO

 

NW ACTIVE CQ ON 474 FOR TEST QSO, ANYONE ABOUT

 

DE MAL/G3KEV

 

 

Sent from Mail for Windows 10

 


--------------5F2C23C2D6229AD63FA6CB24--