Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id vAS5ER4t024418 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 06:14:31 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1eJY1U-0005iO-1b for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 05:01:32 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1eJY1L-0005iF-S3 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 05:01:23 +0000 Received: from out2306.xtra.co.nz ([210.55.143.53]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eJY1H-0005br-Js for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 05:01:22 +0000 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=xtra.co.nz Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=xtra.co.nz; s=alpha; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; i=@xtra.co.nz; t=1511845273; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc; bh=EeCNdGu4bA0imoQd9lmKJJZVgEtsCHVSSGmNwrFyec0=; b=DXw6o2YJ4jg+HSInBuyrYMks0Kcn3+iemRbRxCVb6IZrOecEQ6Hyz7g/DjYlSaGy 0iDAFO37BpRsWZzEuzK85i82tpo6JvHseC001/IUPcChQxKOUVpfHxzoLyqS0WSq 9jDUDsmmbaj45llmd+OqlMq3NelChcJ2gJz6yWryrGs=; Received: from [125.238.91.227] by send.xtra.co.nz with ESMTP (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) id 5A1CED99-147011C0@mta2303.omr; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 05:01:13 +0000 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <8bc44fae-184f-f6f0-a2de-025b4311d2b8@xtra.co.nz> <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB9AAAD76D@servigilant.vigilant.local> From: ZL2AFP Message-ID: Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 18:01:10 +1300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB9AAAD76D@servigilant.vigilant.local> Content-Language: en-US X-Spam-Score: 1.6 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Luis I hope you have fun with the new mode. If you or anyone has any ideas to improve WSQCall, please let me know. Already I understand split frequency working would be useful over there. Here in ZL the user base is very small and what works here may not necessarily work over there on 630m. [...] Content analysis details: (1.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 1.6 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject is all capitals 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (zl2afp[at]xtra.co.nz) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID BODY: Test for Invalidly Named or Formatted Colors in HTML 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 170d09a2454389e326e0caea8d7379f3 Subject: Re: LF: ZL QSO Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------20AC77E12A9990B848EA5643" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE, LINES_OF_YELLING,LINES_OF_YELLING_2 autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------20AC77E12A9990B848EA5643 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Luis I hope you have fun with the new mode. If you or anyone has any ideas to improve WSQCall, please let me know. Already I understand split frequency working would be useful over there. Here in ZL the user base is very small and what works here may not necessarily work over there on 630m. I am now listening on 474.00kHz USB dial frequency. 73 Con On 28/11/2017 12:47 a.m., VIGILANT Luis Fernández wrote: > > Hi Con > > Thank you for a very interesting QSO mode. Seems that the word > “beacon” was replaced for “Sounding message” ;-) > > Anyway this feature, and also the commands you can send to an active > station and get back your signal report automatically for example > > makes this mode to work for QSO and also to be valid as a no operator > present mode. Not just another WSPR of course > > And for QSO, something more interesting that the rigid JT variations > and probably more fun. No internet needed and no PC clock acccuracy > > I’m Rx already and will be Tx also this evening > > PS: We have a group here working with communications in caves with > magnetic antennas at 38KHz. Actually using CW with Android Apps > > to key and decodeand thinking about trying PSK. Bet that this mode > would be very convenient for them > > 73 de Luis > > EA5DOM > > *De:*owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] *En no**mbre de *ZL2AFP > *Enviado el:* lunes, 27 de noviembre de 2017 11:56 > *Para:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > *Asunto:* Re: LF: ZL QSO > > Hi Hugh > > I am also transmitting now, at 10 minute intervals, on dial frequency > 474.0kHz USB. The grey line is well and truly passed by now but you > never know! > > 73 > Con > > On 27/11/2017 11:14 p.m., dhchurch wrote: > > Hello ZL2AFP > > Noted, Hugh, M0DSZ > > ----- Receiving the following content ----- > > *From:*ZL2AFP > > *Receiver:*rsgb_lf_group,rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk > > > > *Time:*2017-11-26, 21:42:09 > > *Subject:*Re: LF: ZL QSO > > Here in ZL we have been using 472.5 kHz USB dial frequency to > keep away from an AM broadcast intermod product on 477 kHz > that affects reception of a Wellington station, but 474.0 kHZ > USB sounds like a sensible frequency. It is just below the > WSPR segment so should not affect WSPR reception unduly. > > There are only two stations in ZL who are active, and it is an > excellent daytime chat mode, with groundwave extending at > least out to 400km (for 1/2 to 1 watt radiated). > > It is early days for this mode so any feedback is more than > welcome. A G/ZL QSO on 630m would be great but probably > unlikely. But even one-way reception would be a milestone. I > will reset my receiver to 474 kHz USB and see what there is to > see! > > 73 > Con, ZL2AFP > > On 27/11/2017 4:29 a.m., mal hamilton wrote: > > NW QRV WSQCALL ON MF/474 KHZ BUT WHAT IS THE ZL FREQ FOR A > QSO THIS EVENING OR IS THERE A 160M FREQ ALSO > > 　 > > NW ACTIVE CQ ON 474 FOR TEST QSO, ANYONE ABOUT > > 　 > > DE MAL/G3KEV > > 　 > > 　 > > Sent from Mail > for > Windows 10 > > 　 > --------------20AC77E12A9990B848EA5643 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Luis

I hope you have fun with the new mode. If you or anyone has any ideas to improve WSQCall, please let me know. Already I understand split frequency working would be useful over there. Here in ZL the user base is very small and what works here may not necessarily work over there on 630m.

I am now listening on 474.00kHz USB dial frequency.

73
Con

On 28/11/2017 12:47 a.m., VIGILANT Luis Fernández wrote:

Hi Con

 

Thank you for a very interesting QSO mode. Seems that the word “beacon” was replaced for “Sounding message” ;-)

 

Anyway this feature, and also the commands you can send to an active station and get back your signal report automatically for example

makes this mode to work for QSO and also to be valid as a no operator present mode. Not just another WSPR of course

And for QSO, something more interesting that the rigid JT variations and probably more fun. No internet needed and no PC clock acccuracy

 

I’m Rx already and will be Tx also this evening

 

PS: We have a group here working with communications in caves with magnetic antennas at 38KHz. Actually using CW with Android Apps

to key and decodeand thinking about trying PSK. Bet that this mode would be very convenient for them

 

73 de Luis

EA5DOM

 

De: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] En nombre de ZL2AFP
Enviado el: lunes, 27 de noviembre de 2017 11:56
Para: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Asunto: Re: LF: ZL QSO

 

Hi Hugh

I am also transmitting now, at 10 minute intervals, on dial frequency 474.0kHz USB. The grey line is well and truly passed by now but you never know!

73
Con

On 27/11/2017 11:14 p.m., dhchurch wrote:

Hello ZL2AFP

 

Noted, Hugh, M0DSZ

 

 

----- Receiving the following content -----

From: ZL2AFP

Time: 2017-11-26, 21:42:09

Subject: Re: LF: ZL QSO

 

Here in ZL we have been using 472.5 kHz USB dial frequency to keep away from an AM broadcast intermod product on 477 kHz that affects reception of a Wellington station, but 474.0 kHZ USB sounds like a sensible frequency. It is just below the WSPR segment so should not affect WSPR reception unduly.

There are only two stations in ZL who are active, and it is an excellent daytime chat mode, with groundwave extending at least out to 400km (for 1/2 to 1 watt radiated).

It is early days for this mode so any feedback is more than welcome. A G/ZL QSO on 630m would be great but probably unlikely. But even one-way reception would be a milestone. I will reset my receiver to 474 kHz USB and see what there is to see!

73
Con, ZL2AFP

On 27/11/2017 4:29 a.m., mal hamilton wrote:

NW QRV WSQCALL ON MF/474 KHZ BUT WHAT IS THE ZL FREQ FOR A QSO THIS EVENING OR IS THERE A 160M FREQ ALSO

　

NW ACTIVE CQ ON 474 FOR TEST QSO, ANYONE ABOUT

　

DE MAL/G3KEV

　

　

Sent from Mail for Windows 10

　

 

 


--------------20AC77E12A9990B848EA5643--