Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id vAE6mw0p006036 for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 07:48:59 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1eEUpb-0002ZQ-JN for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 06:36:23 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1eEUpS-0002ZH-Cs for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 06:36:14 +0000 Received: from smtp1.virginbroadband.com.au ([123.200.191.51] helo=smtp.virginbroadband.com.au) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eEUpP-0001JT-EO for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 06:36:13 +0000 Received: from [1.178.205.162] (unknown [1.178.205.162]) by smtp.virginbroadband.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id B56CB4144041 for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 17:35:57 +1100 (EST) To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <15f68ccfd03-c09-1dcf0@webjas-vaa134.srv.aolmail.net> <40168a26-8991-6998-e541-585a8575ad32@abelian.org> <59FCF49B.9050703@posteo.de> <5A06DAE4.9030301@posteo.de> <5A072F91.1050406@posteo.de> <5A083D50.2080105@posteo.de> <34e5e647-caf1-6184-9ab5-9d293486994f@abelian.org> <5A085F65.3060409@posteo.de> <5A0889B1.3020701@posteo.de> <5A09B458.1040700@posteo.de> <4d424ea7-6164-006b-0b5e-d8f205555a65@virginbroadband.com.au> <5A0A0AE2.9040606@posteo.de> From: edgar Message-ID: Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 17:35:49 +1100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5A0A0AE2.9040606@posteo.de> Content-Language: en-AU X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Stefan, Thank you for the detail. Not sure about the VLF reception. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 739d4fb39bd02fc5a2de5437a39bb056 Subject: Re: ULF: A next step for 970 Hz Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------B35F1833AB5AC103EA1A0EA8" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------B35F1833AB5AC103EA1A0EA8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Stefan, Thank you for the detail. Not sure about the VLF reception. Regards, Edgar Moonah Tasmania. --------------B35F1833AB5AC103EA1A0EA8 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Stefan,

Thank you for the detail.

Not sure about the VLF reception.

Regards, Edgar
Moonah Tasmania.
--------------B35F1833AB5AC103EA1A0EA8--