Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id vARB3YGa020724 for ; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 12:03:37 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1eJH5C-0003R0-21 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 10:56:14 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1eJH5B-0003Qr-40 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 10:56:13 +0000 Received: from out2306.xtra.co.nz ([210.55.143.53]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eJH57-00028S-D4 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 10:56:11 +0000 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=xtra.co.nz Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=xtra.co.nz; s=alpha; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; i=@xtra.co.nz; t=1511780152; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc; bh=fflbMuTQctUOuzIJBclTQSXxHGitT50BzWS3G22TsuM=; b=VGs6eHdQVRPt95IJSlWfnh+ERGTBplVUWx6tf+iAmS7TDXvi9zow5H0ikgjr+N58 CvzhQnoGyuC5byCMo42wW4ZRAoeVr/GiRRr/CjUd0uves5FrJUn8is6o5xQdwC3d GArGYXajvpu/BeVvx7SKulOVALT7hZ8CBNzJlO0xCb0=; Received: from [125.238.91.227] by send.xtra.co.nz with ESMTP (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) id 5A1BEF38-7BE71E23@mta2301.omr; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 10:55:52 +0000 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: From: ZL2AFP Message-ID: <8bc44fae-184f-f6f0-a2de-025b4311d2b8@xtra.co.nz> Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 23:55:50 +1300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-Spam-Score: 1.6 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Hugh I am also transmitting now, at 10 minute intervals, on dial frequency 474.0kHz USB. The grey line is well and truly passed by now but you never know! 73 Con [...] Content analysis details: (1.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 1.6 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject is all capitals 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (zl2afp[at]xtra.co.nz) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: f82786fce13a7bdfc3036eb41b44b924 Subject: Re: LF: ZL QSO Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------4F761A94C4452C9D74C76D88" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE, LINES_OF_YELLING,LINES_OF_YELLING_2 autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------4F761A94C4452C9D74C76D88 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Hugh I am also transmitting now, at 10 minute intervals, on dial frequency 474.0kHz USB. The grey line is well and truly passed by now but you never know! 73 Con On 27/11/2017 11:14 p.m., dhchurch wrote: > Hello ZL2AFP > Noted, Hugh, M0DSZ > > ----- Receiving the following content ----- > *From:* ZL2AFP > *Receiver:* rsgb_lf_group,rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk > > *Time:* 2017-11-26, 21:42:09 > *Subject:* Re: LF: ZL QSO > > Here in ZL we have been using 472.5 kHz USB dial frequency to keep > away from an AM broadcast intermod product on 477 kHz that affects > reception of a Wellington station, but 474.0 kHZ USB sounds like a > sensible frequency. It is just below the WSPR segment so should > not affect WSPR reception unduly. > > There are only two stations in ZL who are active, and it is an > excellent daytime chat mode, with groundwave extending at least > out to 400km (for 1/2 to 1 watt radiated). > > It is early days for this mode so any feedback is more than > welcome. A G/ZL QSO on 630m would be great but probably unlikely. > But even one-way reception would be a milestone. I will reset my > receiver to 474 kHz USB and see what there is to see! > > 73 > Con, ZL2AFP > > On 27/11/2017 4:29 a.m., mal hamilton wrote: >> >> NW QRV WSQCALL ON MF/474 KHZ BUT WHAT IS THE ZL FREQ FOR A QSO >> THIS EVENING OR IS THERE A 160M FREQ ALSO >> >> 　 >> >> NW ACTIVE CQ ON 474 FOR TEST QSO, ANYONE ABOUT >> >> 　 >> >> DE MAL/G3KEV >> >> 　 >> >> 　 >> >> Sent from Mail >> for Windows 10 >> >> 　 >> > --------------4F761A94C4452C9D74C76D88 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Hugh

I am also transmitting now, at 10 minute intervals, on dial frequency 474.0kHz USB. The grey line is well and truly passed by now but you never know!

73
Con

On 27/11/2017 11:14 p.m., dhchurch wrote:
Hello ZL2AFP
 
Noted, Hugh, M0DSZ
 
 
----- Receiving the following content -----
From: ZL2AFP
Time: 2017-11-26, 21:42:09
Subject: Re: LF: ZL QSO

Here in ZL we have been using 472.5 kHz USB dial frequency to keep away from an AM broadcast intermod product on 477 kHz that affects reception of a Wellington station, but 474.0 kHZ USB sounds like a sensible frequency. It is just below the WSPR segment so should not affect WSPR reception unduly.

There are only two stations in ZL who are active, and it is an excellent daytime chat mode, with groundwave extending at least out to 400km (for 1/2 to 1 watt radiated).

It is early days for this mode so any feedback is more than welcome. A G/ZL QSO on 630m would be great but probably unlikely. But even one-way reception would be a milestone. I will reset my receiver to 474 kHz USB and see what there is to see!

73
Con, ZL2AFP

On 27/11/2017 4:29 a.m., mal hamilton wrote:

NW QRV WSQCALL ON MF/474 KHZ BUT WHAT IS THE ZL FREQ FOR A QSO THIS EVENING OR IS THERE A 160M FREQ ALSO

　

NW ACTIVE CQ ON 474 FOR TEST QSO, ANYONE ABOUT

　

DE MAL/G3KEV

　

　

Sent from Mail for Windows 10

　



--------------4F761A94C4452C9D74C76D88--