Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id vAHHKQiM018259 for ; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 18:20:29 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1eFkEP-0000jq-Ur for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 17:15:09 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1eFkEP-0000jh-MF for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 17:15:09 +0000 Received: from mout.perfora.net ([74.208.4.194]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eFkEM-0000lS-Uq for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 17:15:08 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.125] ([72.224.254.201]) by mrelay.perfora.net (mreueus002 [74.208.5.2]) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0LfzLR-1ezGSZ4Ayh-00pbFZ for ; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 18:15:05 +0100 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <1581378296.20171117142913@chriswilson.tv> <5A0EF416.2080901@posteo.de> <1510935680752.63562@kuleuven.be> From: N1BUG Message-ID: <60ff18f7-7520-c615-3179-9d1703a9083a@n1bug.com> Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 12:15:03 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1510935680752.63562@kuleuven.be> Content-Language: en-US X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:qE+7B/8JAk67bPsidvLTYtypXiqhGyJyn9Ih+1QzKQVG0nM2rRw mdp6ArZpo6lYJhXhRXXfpd0i27v4Ri6A53uEabfhuVnJ6r7yh4FHJH2r90KmmNOLgB/H0TH gisZJ4Sl5/6beD9eAm7qLBbFwICMhF2xamI8JgybiO3nJz9nLMhCRRlhoKsX1NPmmbXvg0u m0CkyaPCNLejM2LLCnEvg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:bsAL6gVemME=:EntORQgdZihwujJ60u8Dfg CyaBoCuxgyCUp+SM7lFVycfDJoW2Hjiy4JqGtmaM/JHrEWas2x0EF6+I6Z1tDd70AEBO8baeM n6XFUtnzWD3vQT/BkfJwsQXpLEA67DSFiFS6UP4Lo6csS89/ot5mnsT+oZjvMq7ufbBPo50+n oh4CynJVF+fIeAk2nrtk+ti+O7+/RrmylT+UBilqoIcRm3U9h2NzHvsB33L4ZeFi2jLpGIsiE gY8YbDAI/stOCiC5tEpbzsdhsmJHf5kIqFbmeIloG+2Fig2gJsEvUePO07JPoNqJ0tKClyAkX jKpiVJbkTuqzqCfCtz23imhJR2DgDw6NS4QDJXlTC9xriNuoimvSqISgdbCWvYHLnHF9TCTv3 QjDM6/HbHwfUEkJGZPjMNotVzrMsPUauh4KanBB1C/67r8KogyS5lS99vR9ZQRwh4V05l2MqJ DeWzqYJaNSO8lD9CCVF3/0pXpuOmIV75vx8qX8QF8YayqbWni3OMx3KV+f9gxBcsIVzwgdYUo +lFjVahCk/bLlcq6hSlpSsNyNyLNNgVgep4Dm3mRvcCJQytISdsSLwE/ujdnWjs0XU/dZI04R 3rIKpmM1oGcr34YG0LkJibO5XRrXl1RjhxuEDQwWfeL4CKuEjRjV5AQTVYc+r5dHCqx1RUDxr GbL0eeuT01ZyeXVNGj1dQDxPptM4RDhbeGiABlnEEqqbw9CqhGJV86g9cFkKIhrlubCYzB9hp yoMQAWb82Z+kR/1WR/m5NR79M2CKkYZK5fiqUkxmar1CohXa9ggM6cw7Ja0= X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Rik, I agree, what a pity that the slower flavors of JT9 have been abandoned along with WSPR-15. I suppose we are too few in number to be important, and these modes are probably off little interest above MF... [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Scan-Signature: 7aa9ad08848e488e22e0ff1d71f4ef1d Subject: Re: LF: Trans Atlantic 2200m on JT-9? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Rik, I agree, what a pity that the slower flavors of JT9 have been abandoned along with WSPR-15. I suppose we are too few in number to be important, and these modes are probably off little interest above MF... I would like very much to make a two-way QSO across the Atlantic on 2200m, but who on that side will be awake at the hours of best chance? ;-) And will anyone be able to hear me? :-) 73, Paul N1BUG On 11/17/2017 11:21 AM, Rik Strobbe wrote: > A pitty that then 'slower' JT9 versions have been abandoned. > I found in particular JT9-2 (2 minute sequences) very useful on 472 kHz. A QSO took about 10 minutes and these was a +/- 3dB advantage over JT9-1. > > 73, Rik ON7YD