Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id vAPIbbbP014368 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2017 19:37:40 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1eIfG1-0004aY-Rf for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 25 Nov 2017 18:32:53 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1eIfFw-0004aP-Rj for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 25 Nov 2017 18:32:48 +0000 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.141]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eIfFs-0003qA-Ox for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 25 Nov 2017 18:32:47 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A60920C81 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2017 19:32:41 +0100 (CET) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1511634761; bh=hW+0X/TJAWAf3jHoYoThl5bmg5NEwloW/fGDJRveSRQ=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=ILqFjM8t4jAKAjcyTTvwqawy4Bde2xGN6YpKCAhOWxp+wIReA14pdUU75PpNJHcB7 GGUL9LUBtpxZm9HF4qwFI/vLw8xvpLXuO15M82SnO+8CpAxhy73lMSeCuDN73e+dYR 0gdiBkgOD4nTcNVA8rYAA7XE5Xx3LZ+5rPy6FAH0RVI5597a96EZv2hTd7t2y9M+r4 SW+OVlknckhv4P9OxilK+LsHc2V5VZE6+8luU52gdvW04Omej8fctz5CRvpirr39n3 lNTKE9cW8gBmg+aqpGsUDNFRQpbOTq3t+tKxoCdS/GHlxAr63r+MprEvumfdhNA2m3 XhZvc/ISoPiyg== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3ykhWD53bjz9rxC for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2017 19:32:40 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5A19B748.6050109@posteo.de> Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2017 19:32:40 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <15ff36930cb-1d4f-d42c@webjas-vad143.srv.aolmail.net> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Joe, It looks like the NMEA level is to low. Did you select PPS+NMEA at all? Or is it still set to PPS without NMEA? You know what i mean? 73, Stefan [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: ead411ce91f9601ce3974c7575797436 Subject: Re: VLF: Unfamiliar carrier on 8270.007 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hello Joe, It looks like the NMEA level is to low. Did you select PPS+NMEA at all? Or is it still set to PPS without NMEA? You know what i mean? 73, Stefan Am 25.11.2017 18:56, schrieb jcraig@mun.ca: > Hi Markus, > > I've scrolled through Paul's spectrograms many times. Quite amazing > reception isn't it? > > Sorry I don't have much more info on the TX. It has been on with little > down time for the past month except yesterday when the elect. co. cut the > mains in the morning. SL was restarted last night. > > Today I used Paul's UBX library to reduce the neo7 pps from 100 to 10 ms > so SL can use the NMEA but sadly this no longer works and so the notepad > can't be synchronised; it will not connect to the inet. > > It seems EbNaut must be continue to be keyed by the Raspi and SL phase > stabilisated EbNaut will have to wait till the NMEA can be invoked. > > I'll put the feedback E antenna back on now and keep the carrier going > for a few days. > > Here's an SL pic if you and Stefan would like to diagnose the > NMEA ailment: http://www.ucs.mun.ca/~jcraig/vlfsl251117.jpg > > 73 > Joe > > > On Sat, 25 Nov 2017, Markus Vester wrote: > >> Hi Joe, >> >> >> browsing back through Paul's spectrograms, traces on 8270.0075 Hz >> have been visible in Todmorden more or less every morning between Nov >> 13 and 24, with most steady SNR on Nov 19, and none on Nov 21. >> >> Since Nov 11th, 21 uHz data from the DL0AO cardioid have been >> recorded without interruption. In an attempt to bring out your >> carrier, I have tried to stack several mornings in different >> combinations, both coherently and incoherently. But results have been >> inconclusive and don't seem to match Paul's receptions. So far, only >> a small peak appeared after adding 11th and 12th with opposite phase, >> which does not seem right. >> >> >> Now it might help to have a small list of all your recent >> transmissions, telling us during which nights the carrier has been on >> air, and whether E-field pickup was used to stabilize the phase, or >> else when the absolute phase might have changed due to modifications >> of the antenna tuning circuit. >> >> >> Best 73, >> Markus (DF6NM) >> >> >> -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- >> Von: jcraig >> An: rsgb_lf_group >> Verschickt: Fr, 24. Nov 2017 15:08 >> Betreff: Re: AW: VLF: Unfamiliar carrier on 8270.007 >> >> >> This is remarkable. Is this your first TA reception below 9 kHz on a >> spectrogram? The 0600ut enhancments are interesting too. >> >> I've only managed to detect the sigs at 7 km and perhaps at 20 km (on >> Signal Hill) using an E-probe and a notepad. 3500km is astounding >> and a sure sign that work is needed on my RX methods. >> >> The carrier will continue tonight with EbNaut to follow tomorrow >> evening. >> >> TNX & 73 >> Joe VO1NA >> >> On Thu, 23 Nov 2017, Paul Nicholson wrote: >> >> Yes, look at this from a few days ago, >> http://abelian.org/vlf/fbins.shtml#p=1511204400&b=100&s=sp >> http://abelian.org/vlf/fbins.shtml#p=1511118000&b=100&s=sp >> >> and more if you scroll back a day at a time. Note how quite >> frequently the signals comes up very strong at about 06:00 >> for half hour or so. >> >> If you scroll back to the 10th there's Stefan on 8270.005 >> but no more sign of your signal. For some reason it's >> started showing up in the spectrogram since about the 13th. >> >> ... >> -- >> Paul Nicholson >> --